David Foster Wallace This Is Water Summary

Improved Essays
1. In David Foster Wallace’s 2005 Commencement Speech “This is Water,” he talks about a default setting, which is something people do automatically. It is the concept of going through life without actually considering what is going on around you. He gives an example about going to the grocery store and becoming irritated by a woman and her child she just screamed at in the checkout line, saying how you may think this is just an annoying experience, but when you actually become aware, your thought changes. Instead of thinking it is annoying and how you believe you are the only important person in the world, you can may discover how things are different, Wallace makes the point about how that same woman could being going through a difficult situation such as, her …show more content…
With the Socratic Method, Socrates or anyone who used this method, used certain types of questions to achieve critical thinking and to reach a truth behind what was said. While on the contrary, the Sophists thought techniques and tricks to win an argument at all cost no matter if “true” or “right.” Socrates pursed wisdom by accepting that fact that you have to question things and not just accept them for what it is.
6. Socrates envisions two possibilities to happen after he dies, either death will be nonexistent, or something will happen to the soul and may transform into something else. Socrates attitude towards death was not a bad one, because to him if either one of those two possibilities was to happen, he would not mind it happening to him. Socrates prefers not having dreams as well as, the idea he could meet the souls of other people.
7. Rationalism and empiricism differ in quite a few ways. Plato’s belief was that genuine knowledge could only be achieved through reasoning abilities, making him a rationalist. While Aristotle’s belief was, you can only gain true knowledge through the senses, this making him an empiricist. Although the ideas are different, they both seek universal

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The following is a response to this is water by David Foster Wallace. “The liberal arts education is not so much about filling you up with knowledge but as it quote teaching you how to think.” (D. Foster Wallace) David foster Wallace says that our default setting is thinking that we are the center of the universe. Agreeing with these point of view does not necessarily make me think that I am the center of the universe…

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Reading Foster Wallace This is Water bring some good points in what is life meaning. The message is clear. At first the author is direct and non sensitive to all audience, the stories when he connect with message he is giving. Coming from a single strong mom in Mexico, in my experience is always be direct not be pamper with emotions and just get over and moved on; sometimes you can even feel alone and mistreated, but was the way my mom knows how to give love, with a “ are you still crying” when I was devastated for not make my presentation at school perfect even if I studied long nights and in my mind was perfect.…

    • 118 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In This is Water, David Wallace explains that the Good Life is a horizon to head for, but the journey towards the good life is littered with hindrances and snares. He focuses more so on the journey towards the good life and how the quest slowly chips away at the one’s mental health. The chisel that slowly chips away at one’s happiness goes unseen because it occurs slowly, but constantly. The barrage of micro-annoyances leveled against you becomes universal, and one does not notice it because “the ubiquitous and important realities are often the ones that are the hardest to see and talk about” (1). Ultimately what does this have to do with achieving the Good Life or the idea that the good life is more intrinsic than extrinsic?…

    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the two texts that we read in class, Plato, Phaedo, and Lucretius, Nature of Things, both Socrates and Lucretius try to reassure us that we should not be afraid of death. In Plato, Phaedo, Phaedo is telling the story of Socrates’s final hours from being their first hand. In Lucretius, Nature of Things, Lucretius’s telling his view on religious issues and how he got to his view, poetic skills, and study on scientific phenomena. Both Socrates and Lucretius have different arguments on why we should not be afraid of death. Socrates and Lucretius would have their own responses to each other 's argument if they were to reply to each other.…

    • 1540 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The most effective device that Wallace uses is narratives and didactic stories throughout. Wallace uses many stories. At the beginning of the speech, Wallace tells the story about the older fish who swims by the young fish and asks “’Morning, boys. How’s the water?’” and the younger fish end up asking “’What the hell is water?’” ().…

    • 339 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Plato Vs Aristotle

    • 1802 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Plato vs. Aristotle—A conflict of “Ethic” proportions Plato and Aristotle are arguably two of the greatest philosophers to ever live. Though each philosopher has his own, separate ideas, both Plato and Aristotle make valid points about their own theory of ethics and their methods of reasoning. Both philosophers created works that have influenced some of the worlds most popular enlightenment thinkers like Hobbes and Nietzche as well as ground breaking scientists such as Copernicus and Galileo. While both Plato and Aristotle have created works that have changed the way people think for thousands of years, each philosopher has developed and refined completely different methods of reasoning and beliefs regarding virtue and ethics.…

    • 1802 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to David Foster Wallace, our default setting is the way we perceive the world and our attitude towards our everyday life. The definition of default setting by Wallace is our self-centeredness perspective that we are born with from childhood all throughout death. As he said, “There is no experience you have had that you are not the absolute center of.” Wallace speaks of our default setting as a negative way of looking at the world and how we shouldn't look at it like that even though it is deep within our conscious and humans involuntarily use that kind of philosophy to live with throughout their lives. He also speaks of altering that hardwired type of thought and separating from it so we may be able to perceive and examine events…

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He explains a situation where after standing on a long line and having the worst day ever, “...you have to drive all the way home through slow, heavy, SUV-intensive, rush-hour traffic…”(Wallace 14). He elaborates on the way we think but stating that because we choose to think about and pay attention to the “...dreary, annoying, seemingly meaningless routines…”(Wallace 16), it makes our life even more miserable. Wallace mentions that we get annoyed with these people we don’t and disregard perhaps their day is as miserable maybe even worst, than yours. Upon providing these hypothetical situations, Wallace also proposes possible solutions to these circumstances. He suggests that the way you think adds on to how you react to certain situations.…

    • 1155 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    David Foster Wallace and Herman Melville use word choice to establish their ethos as they demonstrate pictures of disorder, while law is not present. “This is Water,” by David Foster Wallace was a commencement speech given by Wallace at Kenyon College on May 21, 2005. It later became an essay that was first published in a book by “Little Brown and Company” in 2009. “Bartleby the Scrivener: A Story of Wall Street,” is a short story written by Herman Melville, that was first published in 1853.…

    • 1725 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A thrilling tangent right here is the connection that comedy has with the interactions between men and gods. Socrates’ relationship to the gods is specific. part of his conviction, corrupting the kids, stemmed from the unique accusation that he does no longer accept as true with within the Athenian gods and teaches this to youths, thereby corrupting them. Socrates’ dialogue of this results in the very interesting idea of daimonia, the “daimonic beings” which Meletus accuses Socrates of believing in and coaching about, as opposed to the Athenian gods. Socrates makes use of this reality to argue back in a circle and contradict Meletus as expected; but, this isn't the thrilling component.…

    • 1172 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Phaedo is a recalling of the last conversation Socrates had before his death, as heard by Phaedo. The dialogue begins when Phaedo meets with Echecrates and Echecrates wants to know if Phaedo knows anything about the details around Socrates death. We then find out a long time has passed since Socrates was sentenced. The reason there was a delay in his execution was that the Athenians don't carry out any executions during an annual voyage to Delos to visit Apollo's temple. It's then when asked about the manner of Socrates’s death and what was said that Phaedo explains his feelings of grief around his death.…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the “Apology” Socrates is on trial for crimes he has not committed. Socrates ultimately does not fear death because of his innocence, he believes that death is not feared because it may be one of the greatest blessings of the soul. For a person such as Socrates that has lived virtuously there no reason for them to fear death. Socrates makes the argument that one should not fear death because only the gods know what is beyond death,because death could be a blessing. According to Socrates, “I had at the risk of death, like anyone else, remained at my post where those you had elected to command had ordered me, and then, when the god ordered me, as I thought and believed, to live the life as a philosopher, to examine myself and others,…

    • 934 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Socrates was a Greek Philosopher that was put on trial and killed because of his teachings. He was also charged with the following: not recognizing the Gods recognized by the state, inventing deities, and corrupting the youth of Athens. Socrates claimed that the Men of Athens knew nothing and were ignorant. During the trial Socrates did not apologize or show remorse for his actions. In fact, he kept preaching and claiming that he was merely telling the truth.…

    • 1397 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Plato's Apology Argument

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Socrates’ philosophical attitude may have resulted in his death, but he has no change of heart when he learns his…

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Death, from a scientific perspective, is a phenomenon that everyone on this planet must go through, regardless of their gender, social class, nationality etc. No matter who you are or what you are, death is something that we will all be faced with at some point in our lives. If death is to be expected in life, then why are we humans, as a race, so deathly afraid of it occurring? Seeing as how many people and cultures view death as being a sad event, it must be said that people like Socrates should be viewed as being unique. Through Socrates, Plato attempts to explain to people why death is something not to be afraid of, and through Socrates’ teachings, he provides a very good argument for the notion that death is nothing scary.…

    • 968 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays