This leads to the questions; what is the role of language and bias in shaping the neutrality of questions and thereby our acquisition of knowledge and to what extent is it possible to formulate a neutral question and thus acquire objective knowledge and truth?
First of all, mathematics is often considered a neutral area of knowledge, as it is universal across cultures, and relies on preexisting frameworks built upon deductive reasoning, as opposed to frameworks built upon knowledge by experience. Most fundamental mathematical principles have been in place for hundreds of years and have not changed, despite an ever-changing human environment. Thus, since the methodology of mathematics can be considered neutral and unaffected by situational biases, the questions posed in this area of knowledge could also be considered neutral. However, one could also argue against such neutrality, as does Munir Fashesh in his paper, Is Math in the Classroom Neutral-Or Dead? A View From Palestine.