Supreme Court System Essay

Improved Essays
The government’s judiciary system is not lacking much in terms of ability and power. More importantly, they have a large impact on any decision the president makes and whether or not it’s constitutional or not. The role of the Supreme Court is to make sure the Government is following its constitution that we do not stray from what our forefathers put in place to make America a free country. The Supreme Court justices are all appointed for life to serve the constitution, justice and to keep the integrity of America in place. The court justices are hand selected by the president of the United States and normally are the same party as the president. Our current President (Barrack Obama) had the luxury of appointing two Supreme Court justices. He appointed Sonia Sotomayor, a previous federal district judge, and also Elena Kagan a former law clerk for Abner J. Mikva (en.wikipedia.org). Since …show more content…
The newest member of the nine Supreme Court is Elena Kagan, who was appointed by Obama and has served for four years and two months (en.wikipedia.org). Another prospect of Obama is Sonia Sotomayor who has served for five years and two months (en.wikipedia.org). Samuel Alito was appointed by George W. Bush and has served for eight years and eight months (en.wikipedia.org). Stephen Breyer was appointed by Bill Clinton, who has served for 20 years and two months (en.wikipedia.org). Ruth Bader Ginsburg was also appointed by Bill Clinton and has served for 21 years and two months (en.wkipedia.org). Appointed by George H. W. Bush is Clarence Thomas and has served for 22 years and 11 months (en.wikipedia.org). One of two appointed by Ronald Regan is Anthony Kennedy is serving for 26 years and seven months, and Antonin Scalia is serving for 28 years (en.wikipedia.org). Last is the Chief Justice John Roberts appointed by George W. Bush has served for nine years

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Judge Neil Gorsuch is the nominee that president Trump has nominated to serve as a supreme court justice. Judge Gorsuch was nominated to take the place of Justice Antonin Scale who unfortunately died while serving in office. This is somewhat of a rare occasion because it is not often a justice died while serving. It is even more extraordinary that it happened the same year the presidential election was scheduled to happen. When this rare occasion occurs, per article 2 of the constitution, this gives the president the power to nominate a justice the supreme court.…

    • 275 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It has been nearly a year since the death of Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia. In that time, we have witnessed a revolt by senate Republicans over Obama’s nominee Merrick Garland, a presidential election in which Republican’s promised a nominee to succeed Scalia, and now, the nomination of Neil Gorsuch. But who exactly is President Trump’s nominee? Neil Gorsuch, age 49, if confirmed, would become the youngest sitting Supreme Court Justice since Clarence Thomas was confirmed as an Associate Justice in 1981 under George H.W. Bush’s administration.…

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Judges elected by Republican Presidents in the 70’s and 80’s are still in the Supreme Court. 1970’s-1980’s Republican beliefs still play a part in modern politics. Political agendas play a role when presidents have to appoint a justice because they want a candidate that ten years down the line will make judicial decisions that support their views. That may be slightly off topic, but it demonstrates the power the president has in his hands when electing a justice. However, the power is also in the hands of Congress.…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Judges, in Texas are elected in partisan elections for 4 year terms, and appeals court judges are elected for 6 year terms. If a position become vacant the Governor may fill the vacancy by appointing a replacement until the next…

    • 876 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kennedy appointed Marshall to United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. Four years later, President Lyndon B. Johnson appointed Marshall as the United States Solicitor General. In 1967, Johnson successfully nominated Marshall to succeed retiring Associate Justice Tom C. Clark. Marshall retired during the administration of President George H. W. Bush, and was succeeded by Clarence Thomas. Marshall was born in Baltimore, Maryland, on July 2, 1908.…

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Most importantly; decide how to interpret the laws of the Constitution, all laws passed by Congress, orders by the Executive Branch and our nation’s rights, in addition to responsibilities in foreign policy. All of this power grants the one individual branch to oversee, moreover, be the “mother” to the children, the Legislative and Executive Branch. The Judicial Branch has the ability to control and regulate laws, foreign policy correspondingly, executive orders that are passed, causing them to “parent” or monitor what the other branches do. To make matters worse, stated in Article III, Section 1 the power of the judicial branch “shall be invested into one Supreme Court.” This means that all of the judicial power invests in the individual Supreme Court.…

    • 870 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As noted earlier typically president appoint the qualified candidate for Supreme Court justice whose views are aligned with president. Supreme Court justice have lifetime term limit. Let’s assume that Hillary Clinton win this election and elect the liberal justice and majority of the justice as same views as justice Breyer. This makes court to be too powerful and may overturn the more conservative…

    • 403 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Electoral College System

    • 737 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The President does not, however, have control over when vacancies will happen in the Justices. He also has to pass these appointed Justices to the Senate who have to confirm the appointees. The President’s vote is the only one that controls the selection of a Justice. The Senate can only accept or reject the President’s proposal, they cannot choose for the President. Unless he delegates that power to them.…

    • 737 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Texas Judicial system has been made to resolve conflicts among the society. It is one of the most complex judicial system in the United States. Being that it is made up of five levels of courts supreme court, court of appeals, district court, county level courts, municipal and justice of the peace court. In a democracy, it is important to have this system because it is the mechanism that resolves the any given conflict in the state. These court systems takes and applies that law in the state.…

    • 922 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the late 1700s, the Federalists Papers, essays written by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison and John Jay spoke volumes to the colonial citizens. Divided into factions, the Federalists and Anti-federalists had their own views on how the government should be run. Avid supporters of the Constitution, the Federalists made a name for themselves, disguising the fact they were committed to a nationalist government. On the other hand, the Anti-federalists focused more on the true principles of the Revolution. In articles seventy-eight and seventy-nine published under Publis and Brutus, the authors clarified the structure, powers, appointments and independence of the judiciary branch.…

    • 1059 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Article three in short, explains Judicial Power of the U.S. in the Supreme Court. The Judges in the Supreme Court should hold good behavior and earn a certain amount of money that is not allowed to minimize during their time in office. Furthermore, article three explains how the Judicial Power extends to all cases, in law and equity. All power and authority is given under The Constitution. The ending of article three, speaks of what should happen in the case of treason and how it should be conducted when related to the U.S. or a person.…

    • 155 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Supreme Court justices do have personal views. They are appointed through a political process. Observers naturally must ask how great a role their political views actually play. Some scholars argue that the justices’ political preferences play a large role, essentially dictating their decisions in many cases. They point to the fact that justices appointed by conservative presidents tend to vote in a conservative fashion and those appointed by liberal presidents vote the opposite way.…

    • 1170 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Supreme Court often checks Congress of the constitutionality of the laws that it passes. If a citizen feels that the law that Congress passes violates their rights, then he or she will be able to challenge the law if the Court decides to hear the case. When the Supreme Court rules a law unconstitutional, that law is now void. This would clearly irritate someone in Congress, wouldn’t it? In the past Congress has attempted to limit the effect of congress two different ways.…

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    John Adams, did this less than three weeks before the end of his presidency and the start of the Jefferson presidency. The hastily confirmed appointees to the circuit courts earned the label “Midnight Judges” as Jeffersonian Republicans accused the Federalists of packing the courts following their defeat in the elections of 1800 (History of the Federal Judiciary n.d.). The newly elected president, Thomas Jefferson, and the Republican majority in the Seventh…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout the United States government 's history, one thing remains the same, the three branches of government are as important as each other in keeping the nation thriving. Each with their unique set of strengths and weaknesses, the Judicial Branch is one that comes to mind when thinking of having the most powerful strength, proving a system of checks and balances to the other government branches. The Judicial Branch is responsible for reviewing the constitutionality of the actions of the government, according to Fine & Levin-Waldman (2016). What this means is, when something is signed into law or actions are taken, the Supreme Court of the United States decides if it follows the rights and laws outlined in the US Constitution. According to…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays