Comparing Two Supreme Court Views

Good Essays
Both Supreme Court justice argue in valid points. The world is changing and so does technology and the views of citizens. While making decision justice(s) must think about when was constitution written and how the world have change since then, if not it would be like watching black and white television today. So I support the Justice Breyer approach and court must be guided by the views of the citizens. Just a caution note I’m not trying to say we must ignore the constitution and do what we like but we must adopt with the changes as necessary.

I think it’s appropriate for Supreme Court to derive new fundamental right. Bill of rights doesn’t guarantee most of the right we have today. Think about 50 years ago someone saying I’m gay- he has no place to live in this society but today it is not a big deal, so does same sex marriage. Obviously, views of the people are changing and they are adopting with the changes. Just for example- who would ever thought to
…show more content…
In other words typically president appoint the qualified candidate whose views are aligned with president. Are they too powerful-it depend on individual views? Our political system have division of power between legislative, executive, and judiciary so they are not too powerful. In contrast, Supreme Court can overturn the law that is supported by legislative (congress) and executive (president) branch – in this sense they are too powerful. This power is necessary so states and congress follow the law and avoid them from being too powerful.

As noted earlier typically president appoint the qualified candidate for Supreme Court justice whose views are aligned with president. Supreme Court justice have lifetime term limit. Let’s assume that Hillary Clinton win this election and elect the liberal justice and majority of the justice as same views as justice Breyer. This makes court to be too powerful and may overturn the more conservative

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Supreme Court justices set the direction of the Court and the ideals that guide it for multiple generations. The current process of appointing new judges is problematic because it takes away from the main purpose of the Supreme Court: interpreting legal decisions, without the influence of outside political biases and matters. The task of appointing a new Supreme Court justice was a hot topic of the 2016 presidential election. After Justice Antonin Scalia’s passing, the Supreme Court was split between four conservative justices and four liberal justices. President Obama nominated a candidate to fill his seat, but the Republican Senate did not confirm his nomination because they did not want another liberal judge to replace Scalia, and decided to wait until the newly elected President to make the nomination.…

    • 1098 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Confidence In Congress

    • 1227 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Do you believe the President 's foreign policy powers should be dominant and he should have exclusive control over foreign relations or do you believe Congress should play more of a role in these affairs? This question can be approached in many ways, no matter the angle of approach it is honestly the best way to have it. I understand there may be misused in some people’s opinions, but the truth remains that certain things are unavoidable. The rationality is every so often even someone in this position may not be agreed with, but overall it is best that the public does not know all and that the President is in the power position in this instance. Some may not agree, but many Presidents have made great decisions and allies in these sorts of relations.…

    • 1227 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Ten Amendments

    • 1805 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The society within the United States is changing and so should we to not only help our society but to help our government grow as well. “The strength of the United States Constitution is its inheritability to change as society does. The constitution is applied as it is interpreted by judges, most importantly the nine justices of the united states supreme court and altered by amendments (...) (Evinger 4). By allowing the constitution to change as our government and society needs to, we are able to grow as a nation as time continues. If the constitution stops being amended,the constitution we could have a society that does not follow what the government says because they do not want to conform to society.…

    • 1805 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Two Presidencies Theory

    • 876 Words
    • 4 Pages

    While the president is able to pass executive orders to change policy, these orders may be defunded by congress, counteracted by congressional legislation, or deemed unconstitutional by the Supreme Court. In addition, although a president is able to veto legislation, if a president continually vetoes legislation, the public may not look on him/her favorably, which would impact their electability. These factors seem to limit the president’s power greatly; however, so long as the president’s executive order is not unconstitutional, the president still wields remarkable power, as Congress would need a majority opposition in order to defund the president’s executive order. Furthermore, many of the president’s constituents could be swayed if the president were to deliver a speech concerning the necessity of his executive order. The executive branch, being the largest branch in government, requires that the president divides his power among the vice president, department heads, and heads of independent agencies in order to accomplish all of the administration’s tasks.…

    • 876 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Now in the United State, the Constitution divides formal power in foreign policymaking between the President and Congress. The President has the right to maintain the initiative, it means the President has more power than the Congress. The President can implement the foreign policy , negotiates treaties, proclaim friendship, so this make the President become more powerful. However, the Congress can reject the President 's initiatives if they have enough ratified refusal . In this way, the President can not be too powerful that he can do whatever he wants.…

    • 1489 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The framers of the constitution wanted to have a president with limited power because they wanted to prevent another tyranny. As stated in Federalist #46, “The accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive, and judiciary, in the same hands…may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny.” The framers created a government with checks and balances which caused the separation of power composed of the three branches: Legislative (congress), Executive (president), and Judicial (supreme court). They didn’t want a single branch to become too powerful, so they gave each branch specific checks that they could use on the other two branches to keep them in line. Although the president was intended to be weak on paper, actually to the American…

    • 1047 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    They point to the fact that justices appointed by conservative presidents tend to vote in a conservative fashion and those appointed by liberal presidents vote the opposite way. The confirmation battles over recently nominated justices certainly suggest that many people view the justices’ personal politics as an important factor in judicial decision-making. But we should not so quickly conclude that Supreme Court justices, like politicians, merely try to institute their own policy preferences. A number of factors complicate the analysis. First, it is difficult to disentangle a justice’s political preferences from his or her…

    • 1170 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    I believe it could also prevent tyranny in which not too much power is given to just one person. If Congress did not play an important role in foreign policy I think the President would have too much power in foreign policy making because there would be no checks from legislature to agree with the President being right or wrong in his actions. If there wasn’t any checks coming from Congress, the President would be able to do almost anything of being able to appoint ambassadors without being approved by no one else but himself, he would make it to where almost the whole legislative branch of is in his favor. I also believe that the President would make many more mistakes for the country because there would only be one person in charge of the policy with no other say the President would overall have too much power. Congress is able to check the presidential powers is enough for being an important role in foreign policy making.…

    • 1223 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Congress can overrule the Presidents decision by simply getting 2/3 of Congress to agree that a bill should become a law. Ultimately, if both houses are Republican and the President is a Democrat, they will be able to pass conservative bills without the authorizations of the President. This make them extremely powerful, even more powerful than the President himself. Another reason that they are the most powerful branch is because they have the power to remove the President and Federal Judges form impeachment. People might argue that the Supreme Court has more power because they can declare laws that are created unconstitutional.…

    • 1331 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Theory Of Polarization

    • 949 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Now this polarization is starting to affect the court system. The Republicans do not what the president to elect a liberal candidate for the US Supreme Court, because that will mean the Supreme Court majority would lie on the liberal side of issues rather than the conservative side. These ideas connect more with the elite-driven polarization theory, mostly because the elites are the people involved in Congress, Congress being the ones that make these decisions affecting the court system and the president’s…

    • 949 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays