Neil Gorsuch Pros And Cons

Improved Essays
It has been nearly a year since the death of Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia. In that time, we have witnessed a revolt by senate Republicans over Obama’s nominee Merrick Garland, a presidential election in which Republican’s promised a nominee to succeed Scalia, and now, the nomination of Neil Gorsuch. But who exactly is President Trump’s nominee? Neil Gorsuch, age 49, if confirmed, would become the youngest sitting Supreme Court Justice since Clarence Thomas was confirmed as an Associate Justice in 1981 under George H.W. Bush’s administration. Like both Thomas and Scalia, Gorsuch is considered an ardent originalist, adhering to a strict and textual interpretation to the Constitution. Those who have read his opinions seem to attribute …show more content…
He obtained his bachelors degree from Columbia University in 1988 before going on to receive his Juris Doctorate from Harvard Law School in 1991. Additionally, he has a Doctorate in Legal Philosophy form the University of Oxford which he recieved in 2004. Although his academic record is stellar, his actual legal experience may be considered even more impressive. Following his tenure at Harvard Law, Gorsuch served as a clerk for Judge David Sentelle of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. He also served as a clerk for Supreme Court Justices Byron White and Anthony Kennedy. Between 1995 and 2006 he worked as a partner for the reputable Kellog Huber, Hanson, Todd, Evans and Figel, in addition to briefly serving as a deputy associate attorney general. From 2006 onward, he has served as a Judge for the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals. For his 2006 seat on the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals, Gorsuch was also subjected to the nomination process. During this time, it should be noted that he received high praise from members of both parties. In fact, during his senator confirmation, no senator objected to the “intelligent, thoughtful, and appreciative nominee”. Ken Salazar (D-Col) would also praise Gorsuch as having “impressive …show more content…
Gorsuch’s stances on many of the more divisive issues facing the United States are practically as unclear as the vocabulary of his predecessor. On immigration, he has offered no definitive ruling. However, being an ardent constitutionalist, he has stated "A government of diffused powers, [omit] is a government less capable of invading the liberties of the people.” This seems to signal trouble for a President who has issued executive orders at an unprecedented rate and of remarkable scope. On abortion, Gorsuch has never given an opinion, but has been known to err on the side of religious freedom. What many liberals may find appealing is the fact that Gorsuch is a conservationist. During his tenure as a Judge for the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals, he sided with renewable energy in upholding the environmental regulations placed upon the Coal Industry. His stances on other issues such as gun rights, recreational marijuana, and other hot button topics remain shrouded in

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Judge Neil Gorsuch is the nominee that president Trump has nominated to serve as a supreme court justice. Judge Gorsuch was nominated to take the place of Justice Antonin Scale who unfortunately died while serving in office. This is somewhat of a rare occasion because it is not often a justice died while serving. It is even more extraordinary that it happened the same year the presidential election was scheduled to happen. When this rare occasion occurs, per article 2 of the constitution, this gives the president the power to nominate a justice the supreme court.…

    • 275 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Jeff Sessions as Attorney General Jeff Sessions is the United States Attorney General or head of the Department of Justice and was President Trump’s first pick for this position. Born Jefferson Beauregard "Jeff" Sessions III, the 69-year-old was Alabama's attorney general before he joined the Senate in 1996. Many oppose him as the Attorney General because of rumors of racism but these are just rumors and have no factual backing. This piece is made to support the President’s decision and provide several reasons why Jeff Sessions is qualified to be the United States Attorney General (Jeff Sessions). Jeff Sessions is experienced in judiciary work.…

    • 246 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    What got Clarence the job came from the retirement of the former African American Supreme Justice Thurgood Marshall, and which led Bush to nominate him as a replacement. In 1991 he was barely confirmed not including being accused of sexual harassment by a lawyer in public hearing. Now we know how he got in Supreme justice but what…

    • 271 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Although true to his conservative views is willing to overturn federal laws. Thomas has surprised many with decisions dissenting landmark cases upholding the Affordable Care Act, giving gay couples the rights to get married and rejecting that the state of Texas could reject specialty license plate featuring an image of the Confederate…

    • 1085 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Neil Gorsuch Case Study

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Once you’re a Supreme Court that is it, no going back. A Supreme Court Justice should have experience in making favorable and unfavorable rulings before he or she takes the job. Judge Gorsuch does have experience with rulings of that kind. One of Gorsuch's most high profile rulings is the Frozen Trucker case. A summary of the case: A truck driver abandoned his cargo to find help because he knew if he stayed in that truck any longer he'll start to expire from the extreme cold.…

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As for his interpretation style, he is a Developmentalist, and as a Developmentalist Justice Breyer follows the…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Neil Gorsuch Essay

    • 561 Words
    • 3 Pages

    “He thinks very, very deeply about the fundamental tenets of our democracy. Those are not quaint, fuzzy concepts to him.” Gorsuch is also known for his defense of religious freedom, as he sided with several religious organizations and businesses in significant cases such as the Hobby Lobby case and the case involving Little Sisters of the Poor, in which the plaintiffs sought an exemption from the Affordable Care Act’s contraception…

    • 561 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Justice Stephen Breyer Justice Stephen Breyer has been on the Supreme Court for almost 22 years. He was confirmed to the court by the Senate on June 29, 1994. Justice Breyer’s confirmation was not a surprise considering how highly qualified he was, as well as, how highly others thought of him. For most of Breyer’s adult life he has had an influential role in the legal field. This paper will summarize Justice Stephen Breyer’s early life through today.…

    • 1934 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He was descended from slaves on both sides of his family.[2][3] His original name was Thoroughgood, but he shortened it to Thurgood.[2] His father, William Marshall, worked as a railroad porter, and his mother Norma, as a teacher; they instilled in him an appreciation for the United States Constitution and the rule of law.[4] Marshall first learned how to debate from his father, who took Marshall and his brother to watch court cases; they would later debate what they had seen. The family also debated current events after dinner. Marshall said that although his father never told him to became a lawyer, he “turned me into one.…

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Clarence Thomas Essay

    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Clarence Thomas was appointed to the Supreme Court to replace Thurgood Marshall, however, regarding his stances, Thomas is practically the “anti-Thurgood”. Thomas approaches constitutional interpretation of the law through the “originalist” perspective, meaning this “philosophy calls for interpreting the Constitution by looking to the words in the document” (American progress). Thomas is one of the many Roman Catholics sitting on the Court and is also widely considered the most conservative. Clarence Thomas had been said to have specific policy preferences closer to that of an extreme conservative. Thomas is anti-gay marriage and he is against affirmative action.…

    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As a matter of fact, Presidents tend to exclusively fill Supreme Court vacancies with Judges that they know will lean towards their respective political beliefs. For example, 1939 President Franklin Roosevelt forced the Court into a more political leaning by appointing four strong liberal judges. This was actually the start of the trend of Presidents forcing the Supreme Court to lean in their favor politically. While it is not uncommon for Supreme Court Justices to shift their political views during their term, it more common for them to stay positioned to their political…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    That a case arising under the constitution should be decided without examining the instrument under which it arises?” ( John Dickhaus; 2013) This decision means the rights were given to the Supreme Court to decide this case even though it was stated in the constitution. The courts give many reasons for us to be ashamed of them, but does this warrant the need to limit the tenure of federal judges and turn the court into a partisan war zone? Justices are not concerned with popularity, they make hard, life altering decisions every day without the fear of making many people mad. Justice should be able to sit the bench without fear of worrying about their positions in the court and focus their time and energy on the hard judicial case decisions that come their…

    • 1421 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The president may not unilaterally appoint justices; he may only nominate them, and abide by the Senate’s verdict on them, whether confirmation or rejection. As the constitutional scholar John McGinnis writes, “the very…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The confirmation battles over recently nominated justices certainly suggest that many people view the justices’ personal politics as an important factor in judicial decision-making. But we should not so quickly conclude that Supreme Court justices, like politicians, merely try to institute their own policy preferences. A number of factors complicate the analysis. First, it is difficult to disentangle a justice’s political preferences from his or her…

    • 1170 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Senate is forced to follow rules writers quote “insane” because, they are only understood by very few people and incomprehensible. Lastly, a vote will then emerge from the Senate, up or down vote, on whether he got the number a votes required or fell short. If the judge receives an up…

    • 1313 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays