Neil Gorsuch Pros And Cons

Improved Essays
It has been nearly a year since the death of Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia. In that time, we have witnessed a revolt by senate Republicans over Obama’s nominee Merrick Garland, a presidential election in which Republican’s promised a nominee to succeed Scalia, and now, the nomination of Neil Gorsuch. But who exactly is President Trump’s nominee? Neil Gorsuch, age 49, if confirmed, would become the youngest sitting Supreme Court Justice since Clarence Thomas was confirmed as an Associate Justice in 1981 under George H.W. Bush’s administration. Like both Thomas and Scalia, Gorsuch is considered an ardent originalist, adhering to a strict and textual interpretation to the Constitution. Those who have read his opinions seem to attribute …show more content…
He obtained his bachelors degree from Columbia University in 1988 before going on to receive his Juris Doctorate from Harvard Law School in 1991. Additionally, he has a Doctorate in Legal Philosophy form the University of Oxford which he recieved in 2004. Although his academic record is stellar, his actual legal experience may be considered even more impressive. Following his tenure at Harvard Law, Gorsuch served as a clerk for Judge David Sentelle of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. He also served as a clerk for Supreme Court Justices Byron White and Anthony Kennedy. Between 1995 and 2006 he worked as a partner for the reputable Kellog Huber, Hanson, Todd, Evans and Figel, in addition to briefly serving as a deputy associate attorney general. From 2006 onward, he has served as a Judge for the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals. For his 2006 seat on the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals, Gorsuch was also subjected to the nomination process. During this time, it should be noted that he received high praise from members of both parties. In fact, during his senator confirmation, no senator objected to the “intelligent, thoughtful, and appreciative nominee”. Ken Salazar (D-Col) would also praise Gorsuch as having “impressive …show more content…
Gorsuch’s stances on many of the more divisive issues facing the United States are practically as unclear as the vocabulary of his predecessor. On immigration, he has offered no definitive ruling. However, being an ardent constitutionalist, he has stated "A government of diffused powers, [omit] is a government less capable of invading the liberties of the people.” This seems to signal trouble for a President who has issued executive orders at an unprecedented rate and of remarkable scope. On abortion, Gorsuch has never given an opinion, but has been known to err on the side of religious freedom. What many liberals may find appealing is the fact that Gorsuch is a conservationist. During his tenure as a Judge for the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals, he sided with renewable energy in upholding the environmental regulations placed upon the Coal Industry. His stances on other issues such as gun rights, recreational marijuana, and other hot button topics remain shrouded in

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Judge Neil Gorsuch is the nominee that president Trump has nominated to serve as a supreme court justice. Judge Gorsuch was nominated to take the place of Justice Antonin Scale who unfortunately died while serving in office. This is somewhat of a rare occasion because it is not often a justice died while serving. It is even more extraordinary that it happened the same year the presidential election was scheduled to happen. When this rare occasion occurs, per article 2 of the constitution, this gives the president the power to nominate a justice the supreme court.…

    • 275 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    William Wayne Justice, he was a formidable judge that sat on the federal bench in the state of Texas. He brought forth change throughout his years as a judge and some of those changes would be major reform decisions that will change the systems in Texas. He was a judge that made decisions that influenced changes and it was noticed not only in Texas, but throughout the United States. Judge Justice was involved in many controversial cases and reforms that gained attention all over. Not only the cases were controversial, but his decisions were ones that got people talking about him.…

    • 1720 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Neil Gorsuch Case Study

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Who is Judge Neil Gorsuch? He is currently forty-nine years old and a nominee for the Supreme Court of the United States. He has the typical high educational degree background any Supreme Court justice has. He attended and graduated from Columbia, Harvard, and Oxford. His religious background is a bit unusual, he grew up Roman Catholic and attended weekly mass with his siblings but now he attended an Episcopal Church.…

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Jeff Sessions as Attorney General Jeff Sessions is the United States Attorney General or head of the Department of Justice and was President Trump’s first pick for this position. Born Jefferson Beauregard "Jeff" Sessions III, the 69-year-old was Alabama's attorney general before he joined the Senate in 1996. Many oppose him as the Attorney General because of rumors of racism but these are just rumors and have no factual backing. This piece is made to support the President’s decision and provide several reasons why Jeff Sessions is qualified to be the United States Attorney General (Jeff Sessions). Jeff Sessions is experienced in judiciary work.…

    • 246 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    What got Clarence the job came from the retirement of the former African American Supreme Justice Thurgood Marshall, and which led Bush to nominate him as a replacement. In 1991 he was barely confirmed not including being accused of sexual harassment by a lawyer in public hearing. Now we know how he got in Supreme justice but what…

    • 271 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Raised Roman Catholic, he greatly contemplated going into priesthood as a youth. The first in his family to attend college, he graduated from Holy Cross in 1971 and from Yale Law School in 1974. Looking up to his grandfather, Thomas considered him the greatest man he ever knew. Anderson distilled into Thomas the importance of hard…

    • 1085 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hence, Roosevelt secretly planned to pack the Supreme Court (only his attorney General, Homer Cummings, knew about this idea) with more liberal justices who would approve the New Deal. His proposal was that “for every justice over the age of 70 who refused to retire, the president would have the right to appoint another justice, and so there would be a cap on the number of justices at 15”. If no one retired, then he would appoint six additional liberal justices to the Supreme Court. Unquestionably, he tried to put a mask to his real intentions (passing the New Deal), and aimed to sell the idea that this change would promote judicial efficiency. For instance, he claimed that the justices’ age was central as they were unaware of the necessities of the new times; and in addition, their age was affecting their work productivity, thus needed some help to fulfill their jobs on time.…

    • 1020 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As for his interpretation style, he is a Developmentalist, and as a Developmentalist Justice Breyer follows the…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He was descended from slaves on both sides of his family.[2][3] His original name was Thoroughgood, but he shortened it to Thurgood.[2] His father, William Marshall, worked as a railroad porter, and his mother Norma, as a teacher; they instilled in him an appreciation for the United States Constitution and the rule of law.[4] Marshall first learned how to debate from his father, who took Marshall and his brother to watch court cases; they would later debate what they had seen. The family also debated current events after dinner. Marshall said that although his father never told him to became a lawyer, he “turned me into one.…

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Clarence Thomas Essay

    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Clarence Thomas was appointed to the Supreme Court to replace Thurgood Marshall, however, regarding his stances, Thomas is practically the “anti-Thurgood”. Thomas approaches constitutional interpretation of the law through the “originalist” perspective, meaning this “philosophy calls for interpreting the Constitution by looking to the words in the document” (American progress). Thomas is one of the many Roman Catholics sitting on the Court and is also widely considered the most conservative. Clarence Thomas had been said to have specific policy preferences closer to that of an extreme conservative. Thomas is anti-gay marriage and he is against affirmative action.…

    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This guy will be one of the most powerful man in the world, next year. The Chief Justices are appointed by the president, and serves for life, just like Anthony Kennedy that was appointed by President Ronald Reagan in 1988. The year I was born, so his been…

    • 1223 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    That a case arising under the constitution should be decided without examining the instrument under which it arises?” ( John Dickhaus; 2013) This decision means the rights were given to the Supreme Court to decide this case even though it was stated in the constitution. The courts give many reasons for us to be ashamed of them, but does this warrant the need to limit the tenure of federal judges and turn the court into a partisan war zone? Justices are not concerned with popularity, they make hard, life altering decisions every day without the fear of making many people mad. Justice should be able to sit the bench without fear of worrying about their positions in the court and focus their time and energy on the hard judicial case decisions that come their…

    • 1421 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The president may not unilaterally appoint justices; he may only nominate them, and abide by the Senate’s verdict on them, whether confirmation or rejection. As the constitutional scholar John McGinnis writes, “the very…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The confirmation battles over recently nominated justices certainly suggest that many people view the justices’ personal politics as an important factor in judicial decision-making. But we should not so quickly conclude that Supreme Court justices, like politicians, merely try to institute their own policy preferences. A number of factors complicate the analysis. First, it is difficult to disentangle a justice’s political preferences from his or her…

    • 1170 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Senate is forced to follow rules writers quote “insane” because, they are only understood by very few people and incomprehensible. Lastly, a vote will then emerge from the Senate, up or down vote, on whether he got the number a votes required or fell short. If the judge receives an up…

    • 1313 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays