Furman V. Georgia

Great Essays
“An eye for an eye will make the whole world blind” were the words of the wise Mahatma Gandhi. In no where else is this more so proven than in the American criminal justice system. Our definition of justice is often measured by how long a sentence or how large a fine is and how it relates to the corresponding crime. Some people can get prison time, fines, and even sentenced to death as a punishment for the crimes they have committed. This state sponsored death as punishment is a tactic used to frighten and intimidate people into not committing crimes, but this type of punishment goes directly against the 8th amendment right, directly prohibiting the cruel and unusual punishment, despite the generations separating their respective implementations. …show more content…
The owner of the home, William Joseph Micke, discovered Furman in his home and saw he had a gun with him. When Furman knew he had been caught, he started to take off, he tripped causing his gun to accidentally go off. The home owner died right then and there. Furman, after a one day long trial, was found guilty of murder and was sentenced the death penalty. The underlying issue of the Furman vs. Georgia is whether or not the death penalty in murder cases is unconstitutional, and the Supreme Court came to the verdict that the use of the death penalty in the Furman v. Georgia case was indeed unconstitutional. The Supreme Court also felt that the death penalty fell under the category of “cruel and unusual punishment.” The court ruled that there was a violation of the 8th amendment, as well as the 14 amendment, if Georgia were to carry out the death penalty. There were five votes that support Furman and four votes against him. Two of the justices believed that the death penalty is unconstitutional, except in this case, while the others believed that since Furman was an African American, the case was biased further adding to the point that the case was indeed unconstitutional. Furman’s trial was extremely unfair not only because it lasted one day, but because he was was an African American who just so happened to be poor, uneducated, and mentally disabled, he was disregarded and did not receive the equal protection he and every other citizen have the right to according to the 14th amendment. The Furman v. Georgia Supreme Court case is a fine example of the flaws within our justice system that must be fixed and even more of a reason to abolish the death penalty in every state in the United States. Capital punishment cases are very common

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Sheppard then decided to sue the trial judge for his lack of containing the media and in turn not protecting Sheppard’s right to a fair trial by an impartial jury. This case all the way to the Supreme Court of the United States decided on the question of when is time for the trial judge to step in and protect the rights guaranteed by the Fifth Amendment ensuring a fair trial. In an eight to one decision the Supreme Court decided that Sheppard did not in fact receive a fair trial and the trial judge could have done more protect his rights guaranteed by the 5th Amendment of the United States Constitution…

    • 1131 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The petitioner believed the eighth amendment and the fourteenth amendment were violated as they stated Furman, the person who was found guilty, was given the death penalty. The reason this was an issue was that the petitioner found the use of the death penalty was inconsistent with other trials that were similar to the trial Furman was in. The petitioner argued that there was discrimination amongst the use of the death penalty in Georgia stating that more blacks had received the death penalty than whites or any other racial group in similar…

    • 1213 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Furman v. Georgia examined three capital cases and evaluated against the 8th Amendment amd the14th Amendment which ensures due process under the law. This case was made to protect those individuals from the death penalty tho it seems as if each year this case becomes more and more out of line with our evolving standards of decency. Policy, Procedure and Data-The death penalty now has two requirements to undergo to make it constitutional. They have to host two separate trials, one for the defendant and one to decide on whether or not to use the death…

    • 726 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Foster v. Chatman Late 1980s a young man named Timothy Tyrone Foster, age 18 black African-Americans was charged with the murder of a white elderly woman named Queen White. During the court-martial, the persecuting attorney decided to use his Peremptory Strikes to remove all four black jurors. The prosecutor violates the race-neutral acts, the members of the jury pool used extreme strategy against the race matching of the defendant. Under the Supreme Court’s decision in Batson v. Kentucky, it does not let to use an unconditional attack that defines as a racial discrimination, but they remove any burden they may affect the case so they can give him a fair trial by using legal racially biased jury selection method. At the end, Tyrone Foster was sentenced to the death penalty for the murder he convicted by all the white jury.…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Robinson Vs California

    • 465 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Robinson then proceeds to appeal the case to the Los Angeles Superior Court which upheld the sentence given. After a lot of controversy it was decided that the rulings be reversed because Robinsons 4th and 18th amendments rights were violated. It was argued that his punishment was cruel and unusual. This was an ongoing case for over a year, with a lot of controversy regarding protection rights of the 8th and 14th amendment. Finally on June 25th 1962 the Supreme Court came to a final decision, at this point Robinson had already been dead for ten months.…

    • 465 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Teresa Lewis Case

    • 1204 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Gregg v. Georgia court case is essential to the controversy surrounding capital punishment because it acknowledges the other side of the debate and completely conflicts its preceding case, Furman v. Georgia. Both cases provide the notion that the constitutionality behind capital punishment is still a subject that is up for…

    • 1204 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Court stated that unless a uniform policy of determining who is eligible for capital punishment exists. The death penalty will be regarded as “cruel and unusual punishment.” Due to the Furman v. Georgia case, the death penalty was ruled illegal within the United States in…

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The case of Gregg v. Georgia was appealed to the Supreme Court. “With a 7 to 2 vote, the Supreme Court ruled that the death penalty did not violate the 8th and 14th amendment under all circumstances” (Gregg v. Georgia ,2015).…

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Furman V. Georgia

    • 305 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The death penalty has taken several jabs that have led to its temporary halt and many restrictions. The Furman v. Georgia, 408 U.S. 238 (1972), was a case that combined two other defendants. All three defendants were African Americans, convicted and sentence to death. Two of the defendants were sentence by the state of Georgia, one for murder and the other for rape, while the third defendant was sentence by the state of Texas for rape. Fighting for equal protection under the law, this case were argued on January 17, 1972 and decided in the same year on June 29, with a five-four majority ruling victory.…

    • 305 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He took the case to the Supreme Court to demand his personal rights to hear his privileges as a criminal/suspect. The Supreme Court ruled in favor…

    • 897 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Troy Gregg Case

    • 757 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In 1976, a man named Troy Leon Gregg was charged and convicted of armed robbery and murder of Fred Simmons and Bob Moore. In accordance with the Georgia procedure in capital cases, the trial must be in two stages, a guilt stage and a sentencing stage and after both stages, Troy Gregg was ultimately sentenced to death for the murder of Fred Simmons and Bob Moore. Unfortunately, due to the 1972 case, Furman v. Georgia, the Supreme Court established that the death penalty system was unconstitutional and violated the eighth amendment of no cruel or unusual punishment. Which in turn, raised the question for the courts; does Georgia’s new sentencing procedures have the required prerequisite to sentence someone to death?…

    • 757 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In Furman V. Georgia, the court issued its most significant ruling regarding the death penalty. Rather than focus on the physical and emotional pain of the prisoner as the grounds for capital punishment to be considered cruel and unusable, Furman 's defense argued that the death penalty was arbitrary and capricious. This argument presented evidence that a person convicted of a capital punishment may or may not be executed because the law and the state courts did not systematically apply the death penalty. But in 1976, the U.S. Supreme Court issued another landmark decision in Gregg V. Georgia, which required bifurcated trail structure. This required that trails for capital offenses had to be conducted in two separate parts.…

    • 2582 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    8th Amendment Cruel

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The U.S. Constitution’s clause regarding “cruel and unusual punishment” is the most essential and contentious part of the Eighth Amendment. What does it mean for a punishment of a crime to be “cruel and unusual”? How does one evaluate a punishment’s cruelty? The Eighth Amendment, ratified in 1791, includes only sixteen words: "Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted” (Eighth Amendment).…

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Whilst some think that the death penalty is a fair sanction, it is an inequitable penance because many convicts on death row suffered from prejudiced trials, were mentally-ill, or were wrongfully accused. There have been hundreds of unjustified deaths from the death penalty. In conclusion, the death sentence is an unnecessary form of punishment that advocates the obliteration of human life. There is no proof whatsoever that the death penalty serves as a deterrent to…

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Most of the time in my life, I often hear “An eye for an eye.” Most of the people strongly believe that if a criminal took someone’s life, then their lives should be also taken away as well, but I don’t think that will deter anyone from committing crimes because I strongly believe that we should kill the crime not the criminal. The death penalty has been the highest form of criminal punishment since the ancient times for a variety of offenses. The system gives the death penalty in the form of Hanging, Lethal Injection, Gas Chamber, Firing Squad, and Electrocution. I don’t think…

    • 1307 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays