Supreme Court Case: Furman V. Georgia

Improved Essays
Furman v. Georgia
Any case that can make its way to the level of the supreme court shouldn’t be taken lightly. It’s probably a case that can cause controversy or is because of controversy. Back in 1972, there was a case known as Furman v. Georgia. This particular case circled around the issue of placing the death penalty as the final verdict of a person convicted as guilty. Though the person convicted was guilty of murder, the case was brought to the supreme court to dispute the punishment of the case. There was a disagreement on whether or not the death penalty was a violation to the convicted person’s rights. The person under the death penalty was caught breaking into a private home when they were caught in the act. As the person tried to leave the scene, they tripped and fell causing the gun in their hand to fire a shot that unfortunately killed a resident in the home (Furman). From there, the lower leveled court found the person guilty and he was sentenced to death. Though the person was found guilty of murder, their lawyers didn’t believe they should have been convicted with the death penalty and had challenged to overturn the punishment to something less severe as the death penalty.
…show more content…
The petitioner believed the eighth amendment and the fourteenth amendment were violated as they stated Furman, the person who was found guilty, was given the death penalty. The reason this was an issue was that the petitioner found the use of the death penalty was inconsistent with other trials that were similar to the trial Furman was in. The petitioner argued that there was discrimination amongst the use of the death penalty in Georgia stating that more blacks had received the death penalty than whites or any other racial group in similar

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Oregon vs. Smith, is a United States Supreme Court case that determined wither or not the state could reject unemployment benefits to a person fired for violating a state’s narcotic prohibition, even if the use of the drug was part of a religious ritual. Legally states have the right to accommodate some illegal acts done in pursuit of religious beliefs, but they are not required to make accommodations. This made The Supreme Court decision a major event in Native American religious beliefs, the case attracted widespread support form not only Native religious beliefs but also voodoo religious beliefs. Oregon v. Smith had a diverse range of religious groups eager to protect their own religious freedom and their use of spiritual medicine.…

    • 1940 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The actuality of the case of State v. Stewart consist of a variety of mental, physical and emotional abuse in which Peggy Stewart had been “pushed” in her own mind to kill her husband to escape from his toxic and cruel behavior. As a result, the facts of the case are a wide variety that contributed to Peggy’s “imminent danger” state of mind when deciding whether her actions were truly self-defense. These include the abuse at hand, physiological trauma that Peggy experienced, and professional opinions about Peggy’s actions.…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Re Gault Case Essay

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This case changed my outlook far as execution of juveniles. This case involved Simmons a young man that had a murder charge. I feel at age 17 you should be aware of our actions and with the fact that he bragged about the killing was an eye-opener to think of the possibility that this individual could have had mental issues or suffered some type of abuse as a youngster, that may have caused him to carry out this act of violence. I don’t feel he should have been executed due to these possibilities; however, a tough sentence should have been enacted. This case changed the development of sentencing anyone under the age of 18 to death it was ruled cruel and usual punishment. The Supreme Court ruled, “Capital punishment must be limited to offenders who commit a narrow category of the most serious crimes and extreme culpability makes them deserving of execution.” www.casebriefs.com This is due to the fact that juveniles lack maturity and understanding of responsibility. They are also more vulnerable or susceptible to negative influences and outside pressures. The courts also noted that the character of a juvenile is not as well formed as an adult. This case changed the juvenile system forever for some people.…

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The case of Gregg v. Georgia starts with a man named Troy Gregg. Troy was imprisoned by the state of Georgia after he was found guilty of armed robbery and murdering two people in 1973. Following Gregg’s trial, the jury found Tory Gregg guilty and sentenced him to death. Troy challenged his remaining death sentence for murder, asked for an appeal, and claimed that his capital sentence was cruel and unusual punishment, in violation of the 8th amendment. The Georgia state court ruled that the death penalty was for murder. The case of Gregg v. Georgia was appealed to the Supreme Court. “With a 7 to 2 vote, the Supreme Court ruled that the death penalty did not violate the 8th and 14th amendment under all circumstances” (Gregg v. Georgia ,2015).…

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Powell V. Alabama Case

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, and Eighth Amendments were established to protect the rights of the suspected, the accused, criminal defendants and that of convicted criminals. There have been several instances of the course time where these protections of rights haven’t been upheld. An example of when these protections of rights have been neglected is the Powell v. Alabama in 1932. There are several things that made this particular case so different from that of other cases. The time period, the series of events in the case, and the doctrines that were established during this time period are just a few to mention.…

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Late 1980s a young man named Timothy Tyrone Foster, age 18 black African-Americans was charged with the murder of a white elderly woman named Queen White. During the court-martial, the persecuting attorney decided to use his Peremptory Strikes to remove all four black jurors. The prosecutor violates the race-neutral acts, the members of the jury pool used extreme strategy against the race matching of the defendant. Under the Supreme Court’s decision in Batson v. Kentucky, it does not let to use an unconditional attack that defines as a racial discrimination, but they remove any burden they may affect the case so they can give him a fair trial by using legal racially biased jury selection method. At the end, Tyrone Foster was sentenced to the death penalty for the murder he convicted by all the white jury. Yet, the Supreme Court did not and fails to offer criteria for race-neutral. Tyrone Foster did not get the…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Case: Alabama V. Alabama

    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A Christian woman who was told to remove her headscarf for a driver’s license photo has sued officials of Alabama county, saying her faith convicts her to cover her hair.…

    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Facts: Incident took place in a freight train traveling through Alabama with nine African American men, two white females, and seven white males. Throughout the ride, a fight broke out between the men. The two women on the train accused the African American men of sexually assaulting them. It was in Scottsboro that the men pleaded not guilty. On the day of the arraignment they were not appointed counsel. The judge announced he appointed all members of the bar for uses of the prosecutions. On the day of the trial, counsel still had not been appointed, so they secured counsel that same day. They were convicted of the crimes and sentenced to death, and all of their appeals were denied (Powell v. Alabama).…

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    In Furman V. Georgia, the court issued its most significant ruling regarding the death penalty. Rather than focus on the physical and emotional pain of the prisoner as the grounds for capital punishment to be considered cruel and unusable, Furman 's defense argued that the death penalty was arbitrary and capricious. This argument presented evidence that a person convicted of a capital punishment may or may not be executed because the law and the state courts did not systematically apply the death penalty. But in 1976, the U.S. Supreme Court issued another landmark decision in Gregg V. Georgia, which required bifurcated trail structure. This required that trails for capital offenses had to be conducted in two separate parts. The first part of the trail, the jury determines the guilt of the defendant. And in the second part, after the defendant has been convicted, additional evidence can be an be introduced relevant to the punishment appropriate for the…

    • 2582 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pedro Espinoz Case Study

    • 993 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The case I chose was Pedro Espinoza trial in the Murder of Jamiel Shaw because it has been such a hot topic in the media and I wanted to know more about it. Espinoza was an Illegal alien from Mexico with a long and violent criminal history and part of the 18 St gang and had just been released from serving 4 months of an 8-month sentence. Within 28 hours he murdered 17-year-old high school football star being recruited by Stanford Jamiel Shaw with one shot to the stomach and then execution style shot to the head. The Shaw family and prosecuting attorney where seeking the death penalty over life in prison. To get the death penalty the prosecuting attorney had to prove special circumstances by way of gang ties. The guilt of Espinoza was never in question…

    • 993 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the case of Miller v. Alabama, 132 S. Ct. 2455 - Supreme Court 2012, the issue presented before the court was under the Eighth Amendment and Fourteenth Amendment is it cruel and usual punishment to sentence a fourteen-year-old to life in prison without the possibility of parole. Kuntrell Jackson, Derrick Shields, and Travis Booker discussed a plan to rob the Movie Magic video store in the evening on November 18, 1999. It is alleged that once the time had come to rob the movie store the defendants were made aware that Derrick Shields was, in fact, carrying a .410 gauge sawed-off shotgun in his coat sleeve. Upon arriving at the video store, Booker and Shields went inside and Jackson stayed outside the door, as a look out. Once inside, the duo began demanding the video clerk Laurie Troup give them money; when Troup failed to comply after being instructed five-six times Shields shot Troup in her face after she said she was going to call the police. At this time, Jackson had made his way into the store prior to Troup being shot, but while the robbery was still in progress. It was after Troup was shot that the trio fled the scene empty handed.…

    • 898 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    he was injured as a result of Dr. Furlow’s failure to extract an infected tooth on August 3. John Brown ignored Dr. Furlow’s recommendation to return because his tooth was…

    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Miller Vs Alabama

    • 774 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The case Miller v.s Alabama is a very controversial case that was heard by the Supreme Court in 2012. The case is about Miller 8th Amendment right of not being cruelly or unusually punish. Fourteen year old Evan Miller alongside his partner/co-defendant Colby Smith were allegedly accused of beating…

    • 774 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I think Leonel Torres Herrera’ case is one the case shows the judge's fellowship to the law. Chief Justice Rehnquist concluded that evidence of Herrera’s actual innocence was not relevant to his petition for a writ of habeas corpus absent some constitutional violation by the state of Texas.As this showed that, to some judges, the law is not necessary related to justice beyond the rules. Regardless the evidence is 10 years later. The law is unable to prevent or even delay the execution of a potentially innocent person. As a judge, it seems that their job is not to perform justice, but judge based on…

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this case the petitioner was 187 and the all of them were black. They organized a march to the South Carolina state house grounds small groups in which walk in an open public area protesting the policies of the segregation in their state. The march was peaceful and did not block pedestrian or vehicular traffic and conducted was an orderly fashion on public property. A group of thirty people approximately confronted the group and ordered its members or submit and arrest. At that time the march was not disperse and they began singing religious and patriotic songs like the Star Spangled Banner. They all of them were arrested and later convicted on a charge of breach of peace.…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays