• Home Page
  • Strategic Framework Agreement (SFA)

Strategic Framework Agreement (SFA)

Improved Essays
Show More
In November of 2008, the United States signed the Strategic-Framework Agreement (SFA). The SFA provides the basis for the U.S.-Iraq bilateral relationship. It covers the range of bilateral issues including political relations and diplomacy, defense and security, trade and finance, energy, judicial and law enforcement issues, services, science, culture, education, and environment. In spite of the signing of the SFA, the relations between the United States and Iraq have failed to develop into a strong strategic partnership. Conditions on the ground turned out to not be favored for the introducing of the agreement’s transforming of the United States from occupier to strategic partner. Among the issues hindering the partnership were regional interferences …show more content…
In September, 350 additional military personnel were deployed to protect diplomatic facilities and personnel and in November, 1,500 additional U.S. military personnel in a non-combat role to train, advise and assist Iraqi Security Forces were deployed. The Obama administration officials have attempted to emphasize with each new announcement is that the latest introduction of troops or tasks is logical, necessary and will have an impact on achieving the strategic objective of the grading and destroying …show more content…
U.S. Defense Secretary Ash Carter said the United States is “on the same page with the Iraqi government” (Ash Carter, April 16, 2016) regarding its strategy against terror groups. A segment of the recent deployments are special operations with a deeper role in the fight against ISIS. The operations are aimed at escalating pressure on ISIS after the Iraqi army won its first major victory over the insurgents last December in Ramadi. The authorities have said they want to retake Mosul this year.
For the remainder of calendar year 2016, it’s safe to assume that the United States will continue to support the government of Iraq and will exceed its commitment outlined in the 2008 Strategic-Framework Agreement. However, in 2017, a new administration will be in power in the United States. The level of support for Iraq will be in the hands of a new administration. It’s likely that at a minimum the Strategic-Framework Agreement will be supported and there is the possibility that U.S. support could significantly exceed the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Analysis Of Why We Lost, By Daniel Bolger
    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Analysis Of Why We Lost, By Daniel Bolger

    In laying the blame for all that went wrong in Iraq and Afghanistan at the feet of our senior military officers, he lets our political leadership and the other departments of the government mainly off the hook. While he discusses the drawbacks of counterinsurgency, saying the American military is not built for it and questioning the American public’s ability to stomach it, he fails to take successive Secretaries of Defense to task for their part in not asking the hard questions of their senior military advisors and of a lack of clear whole of government strategy in prosecuting the conflicts. He does not question the decisions, strategic guidance, or policy making timelines of both the Bush and Obama administrations. While this book adds to the scholarship on the conflicts since the attacks of September 11, 2001, it is not a complete history nor analysis of why the conflicts ended, in Bolger’s words, as “two lost campaigns and a war gone awry”…

    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Joint Force Disadvantages
    • 1537 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Joint Force Disadvantages

    Instability and insecurity in Eastern Europe, the Middle East, Africa and Asia is accelerating at a dizzying pace due to violent extremist organizations (VEO), poor governance, humanitarian crises, sectarian violence, advanced weapons proliferation and a myriad of other reasons. This situation, along with national budgetary pressures, has caused U.S. strategic leaders to earnestly consider how the Joint Force 2025 must be rebalanced to meet these 21st century threats and to fully support our core U.S. interests of national security, a vibrant economy, universal values, and international order. Given the likely threats and the current fiscal environment, the general capabilities of Joint Force 2025 that are paramount to meeting the challenges…

    • 1537 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Liberalism In The Obama Administration
    • 504 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Liberalism In The Obama Administration

    Liberalism is the International Relations (IR) theory best reflected in the 2015 NSS. One key tenant of the Obama Administration’s foreign policy formulation is global economic prosperity and independence. American economic prosperity and interdependence with other state actors are critical drivers of global leadership, reflecting fundamental United States (U.S.) interests and values, and accentuates economic exchange with allies.1 (Walt, p.2) The stratagem recognizes a critical need for global competitiveness, sustained economic development, creating good jobs and raising incomes to influence American prosperity.2 (NSS, p. 15) In that, the plan accentuates the U.S. leadership role in oil and gas production, calls for the generation of high…

    • 504 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    National Guard State Partnership Program (SPP)
    • 1691 Words
    • 7 Pages

    National Guard State Partnership Program (SPP)

    The most important aspect of the program is the enduring and long-term relationships developed between leaders in the program, and the interagency and international cooperation it fosters. These activities directly contribute to an improved security environment for the GCC while increasing cooperation, interoperability, and mutual understanding between partners at all levels. The program also provides a stabilizing influence as citizen soldiers demonstrate commitment to civilian control of the military not often found in the traditions of the partnered country. An additional program capability was to bring civilians from US government and academia to partnered nations to facilitate governmental and educational training to enhance support to civilian…

    • 1691 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    Condoleezza Rice's Role In American Foreign Policy
    • 1924 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Condoleezza Rice's Role In American Foreign Policy

    American Foreign Policy is a broad topic; however, in this paper I will discuss Condoleezza Rice’s role as Secretary of State in President George W. Bush’s second term and address ways in which she carried out policy-decisions in Iraq as well as discuss how she viewed her role in the decision-making process; and I will examine the relationships she had with President Bush and members of the National Security Council. It is important to know that Condoleezza Rice became one of the most powerful Secretary of State’s in the modern era of the presidency because of her close personal relationship with President Bush (Bell, 2008). To demonstrate how significant Condoleezza Rice was as Secretary of State I will focus on her diplomatic negotiations of the transformational process of a liberated Iraq and discuss the strategies and decisions made to implement the rebuilding of Iraq. Before I discuss how she implemented diplomacy and strategy to rebuilding Iraq it is significant to understand Rice’s educational background. Rice’s education is one of main factors why she was afforded the opportunity to serve with the President of the United States.…

    • 1924 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    Osama Bin Laden: The Rise Of Terrorism
    • 1534 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Osama Bin Laden: The Rise Of Terrorism

    Following this tragedy and other ISIS claimed attacks recently, the United States and other coalition forces are currently targeting ISIS strongholds in Syria and Iraq. We need to eradicate this threat and stabilize the Middle East once…

    • 1534 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    ISIS And Osama Bin Laden
    • 143 Words
    • 1 Pages

    ISIS And Osama Bin Laden

    ISIS has followed in its path and devoted themselves to corrupting and destroying governments that are a threat to Islam. The U.S. is involved in all of this because of the 9/11 attack, which was organized by bin Laden. And since both groups pose a threat to the countries around…

    • 143 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    United States Contradictory Policy Analysis
    • 1488 Words
    • 6 Pages

    United States Contradictory Policy Analysis

    Over the course of the last 40 years, the United States has been tangled in the political environments of both the Islamic Republic of Iran and the Republic of Iraq. This entanglement is rooted in the contradictory involvement of the United States in the Iran-Iraq War of the 1980’s. In the war, the United States supported both sides of a conflict in which it officially wished to end, but the resources it provided may have actually allowed the war to continue. One should ask, “Why would the United States pursue contradictory policies in a war it claimed to want to end?” The contradictory policies are grounded in the fact that the United States aimed to effectively prevent a victory from either country, ensuring the security of its interests…

    • 1488 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Iran Hostage Crisis Analysis
    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Iran Hostage Crisis Analysis

    Is it ever a good idea to get involved in a violent and problematic situation? The United States has handled conflicts in the Middle East gracelessly from the overthrowing of Prime Minister Mossadegh in Iran, to the involvement in the Iraq-Iran war, and all the way up to the present in how the ISIS dilemma is being handled. Beginning all the way back in 1953, the United States has involved themselves in Middle Eastern affairs hoping to achieve results that affect the country positively. The U.S. started it all upon the overthrowing of the democratically elected Iranian Prime Minister Mohammad Mossadegh in order to install a Shah who was more friendly towards the west. After having gotten tied into their affairs and becoming reliant upon…

    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Decent Essays

    Comparison Of Desert Storm And Iraqi Freedom
    • 173 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Comparison Of Desert Storm And Iraqi Freedom

    Timing was critical for the conduct and success of both Desert Storm and Iraqi Freedom. Diplomacy made it possible for the United States and the Soviet Union to reconcile many of their differences after forty-five years of the cold-war….but it is unable to bridge the differences between President George H.W. Bush and Saddam Hussein over Kuwait. President George W. Bush’s decision to invade Iraq in 2003 was based on incorrect information−about weapons of mass destruction and a supposed nexus between Saddam Hussein and al Qaeda’s terrorism−and then occupied the country negligently. Desert Storm provides an example of an administration that attempted to use their diplomatic power, while Operation Iraqi Freedom is the exemplar of an administration…

    • 173 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Why The US Military Should Have Strong Power In The World
    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Why The US Military Should Have Strong Power In The World

    Washington’s policy of airstrikes. and targeted raids will do nothing but slow the Iraq’s collapse into crippling sectarian warfare. (Voice of America) Plus point of send the US ground troops in Syria and Iraq, it helps for Syria and Iraq will be more secure. Minus point of send the US ground troops in Syria and Iraq, is after the US troops leave Syria and Iraq extreme Islamists will grow again, because it happened before when 2011 after the US troops left Iraq extreme Islamists spread from Syria to Iraq.…

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Should United States Combat ISIS?
    • 352 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Should United States Combat ISIS?

    By supporting Iraqi troops, it is helping the victims of ISIS fight back in order to take down ISIS. If America starts working to prevent terrorism, that can lead to less people joining ISIS in the first place. By using airstrikes, it will show ISIS their goal of creating an Islamic state is not so easy because other people are fighting back. It will also decrease the size of ISIS. To combat ISIS, America should be using Obama’s four step plan.…

    • 352 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    What Went Wrong In Iraq Wrong
    • 1121 Words
    • 5 Pages

    What Went Wrong In Iraq Wrong

    After the war that occurred in Iraq and the dictatorship that came along with it by Suddam Hussein, the United States government conducted themselves as the primary source of repairing the damage and rebuilding Iraq. During that time, the United States government was held by the Bush administration. After all the damage was so called “fixed”, the Iraq government was still left in shambles; civilians, American troops, and political leaders were still being murdered. According to Larry Diamond author of “What went wrong in Iraq”, there are multiple reasons that led to Iraq’s poor reconstruction. The problems consisted of security, national insecurity, being able to close the legitimacy gap, and building a government that all different races will accept.…

    • 1121 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Brilliant Essays

    Boots And Bad Blood Research Paper
    • 1535 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Boots And Bad Blood Research Paper

    Colleen Carroll Mr. Henley English Composition 1113, Section 1 5 April 2017 Boots, Bullets, and Bad Blood Citizens cower and scream in terror as a torrent of bullets and shrapnel violently rip through human flesh and tissue, leaving gaping holes that pour blood while exposing decimated insides. The simple shacks and array of other objects lining the narrow street provide little protection for the innocent civilians. Then, to make the circumstances even worse, a rebel group of insurgents, armed outlaws in resistance to the government and other authority, begin to harass and belligerently tease the armed and highly trained soldiers fanned out on the opposing end of the street.…

    • 1535 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Brilliant Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Donald Trump: How Will The Syrian War End?
    • 1296 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Donald Trump: How Will The Syrian War End?

    Amid the unpredictable, impulsive and erratic behaviors of President Donald Trump, President Vladimir V. Putin and President Bashar al-Assad, it is difficult to foresee a diplomatic solution to the Syrian civil war. The United States’ continued involvement in battling, providing financial support and assisting specific allies engaged in the Syrian proxy war impacts the coalition between the US and Russia, the affiliation with Syria and dealings amongst middle eastern countries; continual involvement or lack thereof, will result in a worldwide battle or place the US in perilous economic and political positions dependent upon whom we remain loyal and whom we concurrently forsake. How Will the Syrian War End?…

    • 1296 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More

Related Topics

Ready To Get Started?
Discover
Company
Follow
©2024 Cram.com
Privacy Policy |  About Ads |  Site Map |  Advertise  | 
  • Cookie Settings