Ssd2 Module 1 Reflection

Improved Essays
The course Science in Today’s World opened my eyes to many exciting and scary topics that I had never given much thought to. It allowed me to develop my own informed opinion about climate change, showed me truth about the scarcity of our fresh water, the complexity of the Microbiome inside of us, the truth of Stem Cell therapies, and the role that Nanotechnology could play in our future. However, what I feel is the most important thing that the course has taught me was how to identify the truth behind all of the different reporting on scientific research by news agencies, advertisements, and numerous other organizations.
Scientific research is conducted utilizing the scientific method. The simple version of the scientific method is that scientists ask a question, create a hypothesis, experiment, collect data, and then draw conclusions from that data (How Science Works, 2018). Furthermore, this data is then communicated to other scientist in books, conferences, and most importantly their results are published for their peers to review (Module 1: Module Notes, 2018). The peer review process ensures that data is sound, not prejudiced, and or fictitious (Module 1: Module Notes, 2018). Understanding this process has helped me to identify the truth behind the scientific research utilized by the news
…show more content…
The Science Tool Kit is a tool that has you question where the information came from, is the information portrayed accurately, is the scientific community confident in the data portrayed, is it misrepresented or over sensationalized, where is additional information, and lastly how strong is the evidence (Module 1: Module Notes, 2018). Questioning each report or advertisement in this method ensures that I have all of the knowledge available to draw an educated conclusion from the information

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    “The Mistrust of Science” by Atul Gawande is a commencement address at the California Institute of Technology. Atul Gawande calls upon the institutes graduates to take a stance and defend the common misconceptions and myths about scientific issues concerning today’s society. The commencement’s main goal was to use a logical thought process to defend the scientific evidence against common misconception. For example, Atul Gawande says “They deploy false analogies and other logical fallacies… when scientists produce one level of certainty; the pseudoscientists insist they achieve another.” Atul claims that pseudoscientists deploy a poor sense of logical reasoning to mislead the public, which cannot be backed up by hard scientific evidence.…

    • 366 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    One might overlook that Science and Technology go hand in hand. They function as a pair to create the world we live in today. Oscar Handlin shows us this in his writing, Science and Technology of Popular culture. He explores the depth of these and what misconceptions come along with them. The traditions of Science and Technology have been practiced for many years.…

    • 329 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    In the Living on Earth radio segment the host interviews Chris Mooney, the author of the book Unscientific America: How Scientific Illiteracy Threatens our Future. The host and Mooney discuses a 2009 Pew Research center poll that found that most Americans don’t believe humans have induced climate change. Mooney argues in the interview — and in his book— that there is a growing gap between scientists and the public. He argues that sciences has been politicalized in recent year, and he mentions another Pew Poll that found that Republicans— even well educated Republicans are less likely to admit Climate Change is human induced. Additionally, Democrats in the past have also been critical of certain medical vaccinations, thus he finds that both…

    • 1111 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The logos, ethos and pathos of these genres is self-evident, granted the reader has the required conceptual knowledge necessary for understanding the lexis and text of said genres (Wadsworth guide to research p.183). Research articles: The research article fulfills its logos appeal because of its well-structured and logical organization allows meaningful communication. Research articles, typically, tend to prove or disprove a hypothesis and finalize their results in the form of a conclusion; this aids the reader in discerning the end outcome with ease. It fulfils the ethos appeal by referencing literature review; also, the mere fact that the article is being published is indicative of its credibility.…

    • 1127 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Exploring the Unknown Science is one that is often thought of as a methodical process. Students are taught to follow a set group of rules to achieve a predictable result. But, once these students are actually engaged in the reality of the scientific world, they find out that scientific research is far more complex and adventurous expanding beyond this simple ruleset they are presented with They learn that science embraces the risk of being wrong and pushes its pursuer to explore knowledge that had previously never been explored. Scientists are expected to grasp knowledge that no one had ever before been presented with, making the field of scientific research one filled with risk and unpredictability. In the excerpt from The Great Influenza,…

    • 1185 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    With the emergence of a new space race in recent years, the topic of space exploration has come under fierce scrutiny. Combustible claims are being thrown into the forges of debate from both the opposing side and those that fervently follow the exploits of the various space agencies. While both sides of this debate have various logical points, they both tend to follow the same well-traveled track. The opposing side of this argument tends to charge forth asking, why should we spend money on such an expensive endeavor when we have problems to solve right here on earth? Whereas the side in defiant favor of space exploration routinely counters with an argument that space exploration is an undertaking of rich discovery that benefits all of humanity in the long-run.…

    • 1585 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In recent years, the outcry of people against genetically modified food, or GM food, has become increasingly prominent in both commercial and governmental practices. GM foods have a negative connotation; people think that eating something that has been modified is going to poison their body. Not only that, but most of the American public believes that in doing this, humans are playing god, and have gone too far. However, none of this is true. So far, none of the GM food currently on the market has any ill-effects on humans.…

    • 2000 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Public discussion is frequently a positive platform for opening discussion topics and easy worldwide access. However, in Merchants of Doubt authors Naomi Oreskes and Erik M. Conway presents the dangers of relying on the public or popular platform. One of the major issues is the public platform is the number of people in the discussion only fuels to the argument, thus it takes longer to achieve their objectives. The other issue is the stakes and implications the debates have on policy. In general, Merchants of Doubt teaches readers it is important to understand the source of the issue versus what is being debated and to further examine the purpose behind each side.…

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout this week, we read two articles. They are “What is this thing called Science?---Science as knowledge derived from the facts of experience” by Alan Chalmers and “Philosophy of Educational Research-- Quantitative and Qualitative Research: False Dualism” by Richard Pring respectively. From the first reading, the message that the author wanted to argue is that science is not exactly fact, and this is a common way that people identify science. They tend to think that facts are obtained through observation and experiments.…

    • 795 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Rhetorical Analysis: The Danger of Science Denial It is important to appreciate the current nature and status of the world because there are individuals who laid the appropriate foundation for it. As Michael Specter’s TED Talk on The Danger of Science Denial, he outlined the challenges that might emanate from science denial. There are reasons that ought to be checked critically since they affect the current and future generation and they include health, wealth, mobility, opportunity and declining rates of diseases. It is critically clear that Specter did an excellent job that the audience can relate to, he did this by discussing emphatically on important issues that affect the current world.…

    • 1671 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    While in the vice-president position of this association, Rowland developed a speech intended for the scientists willing to promote a more effective way of researching. This group consisted of scientists dedicated to improving the way scientific research was conducted in America. Rowland’s purpose for delivering this speech was to provide the indistinguishable evidence of wrongly-researched science that was concealed during the 19th century as a result of the working world. Ultimately, he wanted to encourage positive development towards the motives and ambitions of American science. In his speech A Plea for Pure Science, Rowland addresses the scarcity of “pure science” in the American community.…

    • 1347 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A theory is an organized, systematic explanation for why things happen or, in the case of the social sciences, why people do the things they do. Scientific research is the process of gathering data and acquiring knowledge using the scientific method, and the goal of research is to build scientific knowledge. Analyzing the results of scientific research will help prove, disprove, and/or suggest new scientific theories that which help explain social phenomena. According to Hunt and Collander (2011), there are nine steps to the scientific method. Observation is the first step for social scientists, followed by defining the problem, reviewing the literature, observing again, developing a hypothesis, and choosing a research design.…

    • 806 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    These can lead to the media indirectly portraying a loss in credibility to the information presented by scientist. Also explained on page 124, “If you look at how the media treats scientific discoveries….[They’ll say] ‘here’s this thing that’s been discovered,’ not the process of how we figured it out... If you don’t help people understand what those processes are...now they can go onto the web and dial up an alternate answer” (Segal). This kind of portrayal by the media ruins the credibility of science and lead the public no…

    • 949 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    It may only take seconds to move through the steps but each step is, indeed, used. From roadblocks to cooking, appliance repair to problem solving at home or work the Scientific Method will help make decisions on the course of action to take. Science is used in life for answer to everyday living and it is an awesome thing to utilize and…

    • 1153 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    A Neutral Question Essay

    • 1313 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Clearly, the scientific method is predicated on neutral questions and follows a strict, non-biased procedure, but the history of science is littered with instances where the experimental results reveal confirmation bias, perception differences and emotional manipulation of experimental data which threatens the hypothesis. A famous example of this would be in the area of climate science. One of the first scientist to notice the rising levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, Dr Roger Revelle of Harvard University, asked in 1957 whether this might be a cause for concern. Three decades of studying the question led Revelle to conclude that the catastrophic anthropogenic global warming hypothesis remained unproven and advised that it should not form the basis for drastic action, in the paper “What to do about greenhouse warming: Look before you leap,” which was published in the summer of 1992. This demonstrates the correct attitude towards scientific questioning and scientific hypothesis as the scientist posed a neutral question and remained disinterested in the outcome therefore he wasn’t manipulated by his…

    • 1313 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays