One of the primary issues with any knowledge management system is encouraging employees to contribute. Similarly, “less than 5 percent of employees had made any form of contribution, and even fewer has used the information the system contained” (C. Kimble) by the end of 2000. Another concern with its KMS was that when people did contribute to the KShop, many of the items were repetitive, out of date or of little use. Moreover, when the company tried to incentivize the process, those in charge or reviewing the knowledge assets complained of being overwhelmed and many employees decided to contribute “for the joy of sharing” (Garud and Kumaraswamy) and were primarily motivated for the rewards. A third challenge for the company was that as the KShop grew, the number of categories grew. There was no clear organization that allowed different employees at Infosys to locate what exactly they were looking for, this would lead to inefficiency in knowledge transfers and time
One of the primary issues with any knowledge management system is encouraging employees to contribute. Similarly, “less than 5 percent of employees had made any form of contribution, and even fewer has used the information the system contained” (C. Kimble) by the end of 2000. Another concern with its KMS was that when people did contribute to the KShop, many of the items were repetitive, out of date or of little use. Moreover, when the company tried to incentivize the process, those in charge or reviewing the knowledge assets complained of being overwhelmed and many employees decided to contribute “for the joy of sharing” (Garud and Kumaraswamy) and were primarily motivated for the rewards. A third challenge for the company was that as the KShop grew, the number of categories grew. There was no clear organization that allowed different employees at Infosys to locate what exactly they were looking for, this would lead to inefficiency in knowledge transfers and time