Social Interaction Essay

Explain why it is important for a helping professional to be aware of the coaction of genes and environment. Be sure to include a definition of coaction, with examples. Coaction is any connection between organisms within a community. Gottlieb gave premium to coaction; he said that epigenesis involves the emergence of functional as well as hereditary competencies and properties. To me an example of coactions is a pregnant woman, the women need to eat healthy to provide food to the baby and she has to protect the baby from any harm. It is important for a helping professional to be aware that both heredity and environment influence human development. We should not focus our attention in one of them instead we should focus on both. Self-understanding is important. Efficacy relies on working theory in guiding delivery of services to clients. Engaging in some activities that facilitates personal insight assists in making better - helping professionals (Broderick & Blewitt, 2006). In addition, helping professionals in ministry, medicine, social work, coaching, nursing, psychological counseling and psychotherapy should understand G-E coactions in nurturing growth and addressing the challenges of people’s spiritual, psychological, emotional and intellectual wellbeing. Helping professionals should understand coactions of genes and environment because it will help them in understanding gene regulation and behavioral genetics. Gene-Environment (G-E) coactions implicate interconnectedness and statistical interaction (Broderick & Blewitt, 2006). Behavioral development is dependent upon G-E coaction. Indeed, morphological and behavioral findings require a relational causality concept in comprehending development because of two coactions components from either different or similar analysis levels. The outcomes of genetic activities remain within the cell. In addition, effects upon behavioral developments factor in the coactions that accompany protein synthesis. Genes form an integral element of a developing system. Compare and contrast the theories of Piaget and Vygotsky. In what ways are they similar and in what ways are they different? Piaget’s cognitive development theory is a theory about human intelligence. To Piaget, one’s childhood is instrumental in their development (Broderick &Blewitt, 2006). Humans acquire, build and utilize knowledge in cognitive development. He (Piaget) suggested that cognitive development happens in four different stages: sensorimotor, preoperational, concrete operations, and formal operations. Social interaction is one of the factors in this theory and He (Piaget) define it as the exchange of ideas among people and this ideas is the construction of knowledge, which you can incorporation in individual’s schemata. Vygotsky’s focused on the role of culture and society in children’s intellectual growth. He (Vygotsky) said that through language we can express formal knowledge, that language facilitates learning in children. In what ways are they similar? Both Vygotsky and Piaget’s theories gave attention to child development (Broderick &Blewitt, 2006). They (Vygotsky and Piaget) both believed the development order. They also believe that assimilations and adaptation are important to learning. They also agree with the need of teacher in cognitive development. Parents, practitioners and teachers assist children in cognitive development. Both theorists believed that nature plays a significant role in influencing learning in children. Vygotsky and Piaget understand that young learners begin from simple to complex skills and information when growing up. In what ways are they different? Piaget concentrated on the thought process of the individual and believes that development is universal and the stages are the same regardless of context, that children acquire knowledge through their own exploration. For Piaget, development precedes learning. Piaget believes that humans acquire knowledge through accommodation and assimilation of schemas. He (Piaget) believes that we learn because we strive to balance between the prior knowledge in the schema and the new information we are receiving. According to Piaget, language depends upon development. He also agreed that children do not begin learning until they attain a …show more content…
Vygotsky believed that social interactions are vital in order for children to learn new information. Vygotsky went ahead and created a concept called scaffolding; this is whereby teachers assist learners by encouraging them with questions and ideas that are within the learners ' zone of proximal development. He (Vygotsky) deeply stressed on the impact of environment on a child 's cognitive development. That development precedes learning. To Vygotsky, language depends upon thought processes. But to Piaget, language depends upon development. To Vygotsky, the Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD) determines cognitive development potential. ZPD occurs when children participate in social