Selection Process Case Study

Improved Essays
I chose the following 3 states to review: California, Pennsylvania and New Jersey
California:
Selection Process: The governor appoints nominees to the Supreme Court and courts of appeals to 12-year terms. These judges are subject to retention elections for additional 12-year terms. Superior Court Judges are elected in nonpartisan elections for 6-year terms and may be reflected to additional 6-year terms.
Qualifications: One Chief Justice and 6 associate justices are appointed by the Governor, confirmed by the Commission on Judicial Appointments, and confirmed by the public at the next general election. An equity likewise precedes the voters toward the finish of his or her 12-year term. A person must also be a member of the State Bar
…show more content…
Judges are subject to retention elections for additional 10-year terms.
Qualifications:
-have a state residence for at least one year
-be a district resident for at least one year
-be a member of the State Bar
-Be under the age of 70
New Jersey:
Selection Process: All judges are appointed by the governor to 7-year terms. Judges are reappointed by the governor with the advice and consent of the Senate. New Jersey is of of the only 8 states in which no judges are elected. They try to keep the process free of politics.
Qualifications: The state constitution requires only that Superior Court Judges and Supreme Court Judges more likely than not been admitted to the state bar for no less than 10 years on their designation. Judges have normally been politically dynamic in somehow; some have political commitments, others have made companions with State Senators. The bar has verifiably inspected legal assignments and let the representative or Senate Judiciary Committee know how it rates the competitor.

Discuss the selection process for a federal judge
…show more content…
A background investigation by the FBI called a BI which contains information such as the candidate’s criminal history, employment verification, and tax compliance, but also reputation professional interviews. Results of a medical examination; an independent, nonpartisan peer review by the American Bar Association’s Standing Committee on the Federal Judiciary, which rates the candidate as well qualified, qualified: not eligible. Once the candidate goes through white house conducts nomination (United States,

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    1. In your opinion, please discuss the “pros and cons” of the Missouri Non-Partisan Court Plan. (Please include the advantages and/or disadvantages of partisan judicial elections and whether, in your opinion, is a better system for choosing state judges. When talking about a state judge selection, the best way to elect a judge is by the Missouri Non-Partisan Court Plan. But there are many pros and cons to each side of this choice!…

    • 962 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    All appellate court justices must be licensed attorneys in Alabama. All justices and judges must be elected for a term of 6 years. If there is a vacancy, the governor can appoint a judge, but that judge must be elected at the end of his/her…

    • 1211 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “I do believe to be a judge you must be a lawyer first to know what you are doing as judge,” she said. “For example lets say someone has to rule on questions about evidence, the decision has to be made a quick and I having tried of a lot cases I’m familiar with how cases should be ruled.” With those experience in mind Theall suggested a change in requirement to the 10 years of practicing law that is required to run for the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeal. “There is a minimum of 10 years to run for this positions,” she said. “You do not know you are as a lawyer in 10 years…

    • 884 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Explain the Missouri Plan. Judges are appointed to benches by the governor with the senates approval for a probationary period. At the end of the period each judge’s performances are reviewed by a group of judicial experts. If the judge passes their evaluation they can run for the bench in a popular election. 3.…

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In the United States, the court system judicial authority is shared between the levels of government. Today, the Texas Constitution lacks power in people, campaign contributions, lack of minority representation on the bench, perceptions of fairness, and lack of knowledge on the part of the voters. Due to lack of these powers, people distrust the changes that could give the government even more power. Thought the states in United States, the Texas judiciary is among the most complicated and confusing systems. Courts are expected by the country to act in nonpolitical ways, focus on the wishes of the electorate, focus on justice, and give the fair and right judgment for the citizens.…

    • 178 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Electoral College System

    • 737 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The President does not, however, have control over when vacancies will happen in the Justices. He also has to pass these appointed Justices to the Senate who have to confirm the appointees. The President’s vote is the only one that controls the selection of a Justice. The Senate can only accept or reject the President’s proposal, they cannot choose for the President. Unless he delegates that power to them.…

    • 737 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    What Is Lifetime Tenure

    • 254 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Constitution expressly states under Article III that “that judges both of the supreme and inferior courts shall hold offices during good behavior”. This could be interpreted as an appointment whose term of office is for life so long as they are in good behavior. I personally do not agree with the lifetime tenure. I would prefer to have the Justices or Judges to serve at certain number of years like maybe 15 to 25 years. Lifetime tenure creates problems such as it allows bad Justices to remain at the bench for a long time except instances were impeachments against them prosper.…

    • 254 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Texas County Government

    • 327 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The state constitution provides for the election of several county officials from the county judge to the justice of the peace. County government is highly decentralized and no one official is responsible for supervising the activies of all county officials. Each County has four precinct. Each precinct a commissioner is elected into what is called the commissioners court.…

    • 327 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Supreme Court is commonly thought to be “above politics,” since they are there to just interpret the law and not argue politic, inevitably though, politics still manages to seep in. In fact the appointment of justices is, in reality, extremely political due to all the factors needed to be appointed. In order to be a justice three main characteristics are needed: ideology, ethnicity, and political experience. Each one has a profound impact in the appointment process. Interests groups are extremely concerned with the whole process because it could help or hurt the interests groups and it constitutions for generations if a justice is appointed that has contradictory views.…

    • 862 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Supreme Court is supposed to be immune from democracy’s demands; term limits would not help the function of the court if so then politicians who have faced Washington for decades should also be constricted. Limiting the terms of public office is unresponsive to any significant dimension of our politics. (David Harsanvi; 2014)…

    • 1421 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Merit Selection System

    • 226 Words
    • 1 Pages

    In 1974, Arizona voters passed along a new election system called,” merit selection”. This applies for counties that have 250,000 or more population. However, counties will lesser population can still apply this system if the voters of the county agree with it. Merit Selection has broader definition that has been break done in the following. Special nonpartisan judicial nominating commissions process applications of those who filed and submitted nomination to the governor within sixty days.…

    • 226 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    First, a judge has to be nominated by the President (stated in Article II Section 2 in the U.S. Constitution) Obama can replace whomever he wants to (filling in for Justice Scalia) Once the President has nominated a judge, the Senate Judiciary Committee needs to confirm and the President needs to appoint the new judge. Secondly, the Judiciary Committee has a three step process as to confirming a supreme court judge. Firstly, the Committee does an investigation into the judge’s background. Next, the Committee will hold a public hearing in which the judge is questioned and gives testimonies about everything from his or her judicial philosophy to his or her stand on abortion.…

    • 1313 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Brothel Boy Case Study

    • 1251 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The federal judges are nominated by the President of the United States, and approved but the United States Senate. With having the definitive authority in the courts, the judge is the only one who can set bail, instruct jurors about the meaning of the law, and impose sentences. With a plea of guilty, it is the quickest way to resolve a heavy caseload for not only the judge, but also the prosecutors and defense…

    • 1251 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    EXPLAIN THE MAIN DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE LEGAL SYSTEM OF ENGLAND AND WALES AND THOSE OF CIVIL LAW COUNTRIES AND EXPLAIN THE MERITS AND PROBLEMS OF THESE LEGAL SYSTEMS A HISTORY OF TWO TYPES OF LAW The two main systems of law in the world today are common law and civil law. The system used in England and Wales is common law which has an evolving history dating from the Norman conquest of England in 1066 and the local customs of the Anglo-Saxons. English common law spread throughout the world during the growth of the British empire between the 16th and 18th centuries.…

    • 1466 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Throughout our history, there has been a concurring question, in which the burden has weighed heavy the shoulders of many citizens. Should Supreme Court judges be elected or appointed? In the process of this debate, a main concern of the overall argument shadows the question that if today’s method of selection is constitutional and publicly acceptable. In order to keep the public content and still have a reliable court system, there are many factors that are taken into place, which is also one of the reasons why the answer to this question has yet to be justified. In addition, there is an equal amount of supporters on either side who each claim their position is the most ethical and reasonable choice.…

    • 2056 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays