What Is Lifetime Tenure

Decent Essays
The Constitution expressly states under Article III that “that judges both of the supreme and inferior courts shall hold offices during good behavior”. This could be interpreted as an appointment whose term of office is for life so long as they are in good behavior. I personally do not agree with the lifetime tenure. I would prefer to have the Justices or Judges to serve at certain number of years like maybe 15 to 25 years. Lifetime tenure creates problems such as it allows bad Justices to remain at the bench for a long time except instances were impeachments against them prosper. Secondly, even the Justices are no longer productive and effective in doing their work they still enjoy the privilege on not getting fired from the job. Although,

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    The Supreme Court has always been held in high regard due to the proficiency of its small and elite staff. In A More…

    • 1870 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The world does not stop spinning when the Senate of the United States is in recess. However, vacancies in governmental positions do appear and need appointment. Since the Senate cannot carry out the task while in recess, Article II of the Constitution gives the president the “power to fill up all vacancies that may happen during the recess of the Senate, by granting commissions which shall expire at the end of their next session.” The president has the “sole authority” to temporarily fill such positions without Senate approval so as to maintain the flow of governmental action. However, the Senate can be in a pro forma session that prevents the president from making appointments due to the fact that the Senate is technically in session.…

    • 1127 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Judges, in Texas are elected in partisan elections for 4 year terms, and appeals court judges are elected for 6 year terms. If a position become vacant the Governor may fill the vacancy by appointing a replacement until the next…

    • 876 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ramona Salvarez Interview

    • 531 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Today I will be interviewing The Honorable Ramona Salvarez about her being an honorable judge. Me: How is your role in government different from an elected official? Salvarez: The role I play in the government differs from those who are elected officials.…

    • 531 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Have you ever heard of the phrase “supreme court”? Well, in the judicial branch of the United States government, the phrase is an everyday thing for them. This is because they work in law and, more specifically, the supreme justices of court. Basically, it’s their job to serve up justice. This type of thing, was what Thurgood Marshall ended up doing for a living.…

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Tenure Contract Definition

    • 1602 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Being able to live in the United States is a privilege. The amendments protect the freedoms granted to American citizens. The first amendment is the most profound privilege that some countries do not grant their citizens. Although professors are protected under the first amendment, they have to be careful of what they say in a public setting. If the misrepresent their university, then their job can be at risk.…

    • 1602 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Texas judicial system right now is defined by elected judges that make decisions based on what will get them elected again, and personal ideological views. If the state had judges that were appointed, they would be less worried about reelections and raising money, so the state government to run more smoothly and verdicts would be less biased. Both sides of the argument have benefits and downsides, but the benefits of having appointed judges out rules those of the elected one. The decision to have elected or appointed judges is important because it affects the way that the laws of a given state, namely Texas, are interpreted and carried out. For example, if a judge accepts a large sum of money from a company or person to fund their election campaigns, it is close to impossible that that particular judge will not have a…

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Tenth Amendment states, “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people”. * It seems, sometimes, that the Supreme Court is involved in issues where they have no business being, and similarly with the federal government. While their intervention is supposed to be in the name of the freedom of the American people, it acts as an infringement upon that freedom. As it is seen in US Term Limits v Thornton and Arizona State Legislature v Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission, when the people consciously consent to laws that have been passed and the way in which they are carried out, it is unnecessary for the Court or the federal…

    • 1198 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    If life tenure is such a good idea, as it would eliminate the above mentioned problems, then why are so many in opposition of term limits and shuns the proposals? They value judicial independence, and they all have forms of accountability and term limits, so what are the reasons for their views and objections about cutting life tenure? Making term limits would not make the stakes any less important or productive.…

    • 1421 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Constitution of the United States is best understood as the product of a balancing act between the Founders’ desire to avoid a tyranny and their recognition of the need to form a strong government that would ensure national stability and prosperity. The Appointments Clause of the Constitution fits within this framework nicely. Article II, Section 2, Clause II of the Constitution states that “the President…shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint… Judges of the supreme Court.” The clause establishes a clear division of power between the executive and legislative branches in nominating and confirming Supreme Court Justices.…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The confirmation battles over recently nominated justices certainly suggest that many people view the justices’ personal politics as an important factor in judicial decision-making. But we should not so quickly conclude that Supreme Court justices, like politicians, merely try to institute their own policy preferences. A number of factors complicate the analysis. First, it is difficult to disentangle a justice’s political preferences from his or her…

    • 1170 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The 20th and 22nd Amendment: H. Res. 614 In the original Constitution, there was not an amendment stating how long the President could serve in office. The date of inauguration was different than it is today. The Father of our Country, George Washington would become our first President and the first to serve two terms in office.…

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Tenure has become a very controversial debate throughout the United States with two separate opinions concerning the expansion of tenure into high schools. Before the establishment of tenure, teachers could be fired for non-work related and illegitimate reasons. In order to confront this problem, the National Education Association advocated for teachers to receive tenure. Tenure provides teachers with years of unmonitored service along with a minimal chance to lose their jobs. In colleges tenure was able to significantly improve the teachers’ working conditions by providing them with job security from illegitimate reasons to be fired.…

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If you go out and about within our country and you ask people if they knew very much about the United States court system, they will most likely tell you that they do not know very much about the court system unless they have been involved with the court system whether it be federal or state level. Most people do not realize that the court systems have three levels within them or that there is certain situation that will allow you to get to one level or the other. There is a whole lot of information that some people may not know. They may not know about judicial review and how it came about. Some people may not even know how justices decide the ruling of their cases.…

    • 1620 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    On one side of this equation, there are those who argue that appointing officials is unconstitutional, while on the other side they may claim that appointing government officials is the righteous way. Relying on the only method of selection can result in a problematic and a broken judicial system and, I believe that Supreme Court judges should be both appointed and then elected…

    • 2056 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays