R Vs Misaac Case Study

Improved Essays
R. v. MacIsaac, 2015 ONCA 587
Her Majesty the Queen (R.) and Gordon MacIsaac (Apl.)
FACTS
The appellant (Apl.) and the complainant (Compl.) were both members of senior men’s “no-contact” hockey league, but belonged to different teams. On the day in question, these teams were facing off against each other with the Compl.’s team was up 2 points with less than a minute left in the game. The two players collided which resulted in the Compl. Being knocked to the ground and suffering several injuries. (para. 4)
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
The Apl. was charged with aggravated assault. (para. 5) It was the Crown’s positions that the Apl. deliberately blindsided the Compl. (para. 6) The Apl. held that the collision was accidental and unavoidable. (para. 12) The trial judge convicted the Apl.
…show more content…
of aggravated assault, after having rejected much of the evidence given on grounds that it was contradictory, contrary to trial judge’s understanding of hockey tactics, or inconsistent with the trial judge’s assessment of the injuries received by the Compl.
On appeal the Apl. submitted that the trial judge had failed to consider that the defence might have honestly believed that consent had been given even if that was a mistake (para. 30). The R. submitted that the trial judge did not make a mistake in the assessment of the evidence and that the defense’s argument, that there was a mistaken belief in consent, was inconsistent with the Apl. admittance that such hits fall outside what is expected in a non-contact hockey league. (para. 31)
ISSUES
a) Did the trial judge speculate beyond what was reasonable?
b) Did the trial judge reverse the onus of proof?
c) Did the trial judge make a mistake in not considering that the defence might have honestly believed that consent had been given even if that was a mistake? (para. 32)
HOLDING
a) The trial judge engaged in speculative reasoning while rejecting evidence which led to a conviction and denied the Apl. a fair trial, which justifies a retrial.
b) Not answered.
c) Not answered.(para. 33) RATIONALE Trial judges are allowed to draw conclusions that follow the facts so long as these are reasonable and logical, but in this case the judge went beyond that. (para. 46) The Morrissey case sets out that where a trial judge goes beyond conclusions based on the evidence and facts, unless the Crown can show that the error did not substantially impact justice, the conviction much be re-examined. (para. 47) The examples of the trial judge’s speculative reasoning (para. 34-44) were all related to areas of substantial impact to the case, and were numerous enough to show establish that this speculative reasoning had a substantially impact justice. (para. 48) The judge used her own experience with hockey, and her own interpretation of the injuries, to interpret evidence. Judicial notice is a legal rule of evidence that allows a fact to be introduced into evidence if it is… “(1) so notorious or generally accepted that no reasonable person would disagree; or (2) capable of immediate demonstration by reference to sources of indisputable accuracy…” (para. 50) as set out in Find, Potts, and Spence. Hockey strategy does not qualify fo judicial notice since it would be impossible to get an indisputable source, and since people are widely different opinions about what the best strategy for

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Title of the Case: Averill Jr. v. Luttrell; 311 S.W.2d 812 (Tenn. App. 1958) Court: This case is on appeal in the Tennessee Appellate Court, from the trial court of Chattanooga, Tennessee, which is the original jurisdiction. Facts: On August 20, 1955, during a baseball game between the Nashville Vols and Chattanooga Lookouts in Chattanooga, Tennessee, Vols pitcher Gerry Lane was pitching to the plaintiff, Lyle Luttrell, when the fourth pitch hit Luttrell on his backside. Luttrell proceeded to throw his bat in the direction of the pitcher’s mound when the defendant, Lookout’s Earl Averill Jr., stepped up behind Luttrell and struck him in the back or side of his head, rendering Luttrell unconscious. Luttrell also sustained a fractured jaw when…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The actual result of that incident was that another person was injured than intended and that is relevant. FACTS 

 This Incident occurred on September 1, 2016 in the Sunnyville’s High School cafeteria…

    • 772 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The nature of the proceeding in the case of Winnipeg Child and Family Services (Northwest Area) v. D.F.G is an appeal. The name of the court hearing the proceedings was called the Manitoba Court of Appeal. The judges writing the majority decision are: Lamer C.J. and La Forest, L’Heureux-Dube, Gonthier, Cory, McLachlin,…

    • 1735 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    R V Askov Case Study

    • 332 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Supreme Court disagreed with the Court of Appeal of Ontario, saying that they found the delays were unreasonable and directed a stay of proceedings against the appellants. This resulted in thousands of criminal charges being stayed, and served as a wake up call to the Crown that due to the serious ramifications of a criminal charge on the life of an accused, charges must be dealt with and decided quickly and expediently. (http://www.chartercases.com/r-v-askov-1990-2-s-c-r-1199/)…

    • 332 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In conclusion, the case did not frustrate parliament and could easily comply with both the s. 6 of the provincial act and s. 30 of the federal act. This decision was because the provincial act met the purpose of the federal act. The purpose of the federal act was to define with greater precision the prohibition on the promotion of…

    • 2032 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    R V Labaye Case Study

    • 1458 Words
    • 6 Pages

    This essay will discuss the case of R v. Labaye. A summary of the nature of the proceeding and the judges writing decision, facts, legal issues, the decision, judicial reasoning and a thorough analysis will be addressed in this essay. I prefer the reasoning of the majority decision as it is reasonable and ethical. The nature of the proceeding is an appeal heard from the Supreme Court of Canada.…

    • 1458 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The courts biggest issues were trying to decide whether a trial court’s erroneous deprivation of a criminal defendant’s choice of counsel entitles him to a reversal of his conviction and should proving the sixth Amendment right to proceed with the counsel of choice depend on whether the deprivation of that right also resulted in compromising a defendants’ right to a fair trial. The majority opinion did not apply the Strickland test because they felt that the defendant could not show or give any reason as to why he felt the counsel was ineffective and that the counsels performance was poorly presented and deficient and the defendant was prejudiced by it. What the Strickland test is actually intended for is that the government must contend that the defendant must at least demonstrate that his counsel of choice would have pursued a different strategy and would have created a :reasonable probability”. In court cases the course can be split into two structures; trial errors and structural errors. Most constitutional errors are trial errors that occur “during the presentation to the jury,” and courts have discretion in deciding whether these trial errors are harmless and warrant a new trial.…

    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    III. THE COURT IMPROPERLY PRECLUDED MR. TULIN’S COUNSEL FROM COMMENTING ON THE COURTROOM DEMEANOR OF MS. MARCELIN, IN VIOLATION OF MR. TULIN’S RIGHTS UNDER THE CONFRONTATION CLAUSE Ms. Marcelin, while exiting the witness stand, but still in the courtroom and within plain sight of the jury, purposefully waved and smiled at Mr. Tulin.…

    • 1849 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Assault on a Minor; Wrongful Damaging Private Property: The MP report stated that the SM was involved in a verbal altercation that turned physical when The DA 4833 states that the SM received a GOMOR, which was placed in her local file. (Further review of his OMPF shows no GOMOR in her file). Assault Consummated by a Battery: The MP report states that the SM was involved in a verbal altercation that turned physical when another Soldier grabbed her by the neck. The Soldier provided a sworn statement denying the offense, and that he was assaulted several times by the SM. The DA 4833 states that the SM was referred to individual counseling and anger management.…

    • 356 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Judicial review of the hearing officer’s decision is only permissible when there is no supporting evidence and/or the hearing officer used improper legal standards, or as the defense phrases it the decision is erroneous. The defense makes various arguments as to why the decision is erroneous. First off, the defense presents two standards to be considered when determining whether a refusal occurred: 1) whether the individual’s statements and behavior objectively indicted a willingness or unwillingness to take the test; and 2) whether cooperation was timely. Gallion 222-223. Second, the argument is made that since when asked if she was refusing the test she expressly stated, four times, that she was not refusing and when being handcuffed made…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The courts had a vital role in this case as the final outcome would not have been reached if it were not for the court hierarchy. The charge against Eades of “inciting a person under 16 to commit an act of indecency towards him” is a table two indictable offence, meaning that it is to be dealt with summarily (in the Local Court), unless the prosecution nominates that it should be heard in the District Court. The case was first heard in the local court where Eades was acquitted.…

    • 132 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The defendant, Mr. John Smith, is in no way guilty of the alleged assault charges brought to the court by his wife, Mrs. Jane Smith. This case, as so many in the United States court system are, ought to be viewed while keeping past rulings with coinciding facts in mind for the purpose of preserving precedent. Precedent is a core principle of the judicial decision making process that uses past relevant cases as the standard for ruling in future cases with similarities and should be implemented as it produces consistency among rulings. Furthermore, precedent can be appropriately applied in this instance since the men charged with assault in the cases Joyner v. Joyner, State v. Black, and State v. Rhodes all were proven innocent for reasons indistinguishable…

    • 1299 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Heffernan makes the decision that he is morally obligated as an attorney to allow the appeal and make sure that the defendant is at least allowed to attempt a fair trial. But as Heffernan predicted, the appellant court ruled in favor of the judge’s previous conviction and the defendant was denied a fair trial and also denied the right to appeal to the highest court of state. Heffernan seems to express remorse over this decision and the morality issues we are currently faced with in our justice…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In the Canadian court system the person who is accused is innocent until proven otherwise. It is the officers job to be a detective and gather evidence to put forth for court and it is up to the judge to make the decision. In this particular case the lack of evidence was apparent therefore leading the accused to be dismissed of the alleged charge.…

    • 64 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    58, (B) I deny the adverse allegations made against me. It was Kate that would swear and call me names. 58, (C) I deny the adverse allegations made against me. It was Kate that pulled chucks of hair out of my scalp as I had dread-locks and longer hair during my university years.…

    • 1672 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays