Northwest Area V. Dfg Case Summary

Improved Essays
The case being addressed in this essay is: Winnipeg Child and Family Services (Northwest Area) v. D.F.G. The topics being addressed in this essay will be provided through a summary and an analysis, explaining the case through legal liberalism and feminist legal theory in relation to the majority decision and the dissenting decision. I personally, agree with the reasoning of the majority decision and will prove why.
Summary
The nature of the proceeding in the case of Winnipeg Child and Family Services (Northwest Area) v. D.F.G is an appeal. The name of the court hearing the proceedings was called the Manitoba Court of Appeal. The judges writing the majority decision are: Lamer C.J. and La Forest, L’Heureux-Dube, Gonthier, Cory, McLachlin,
…show more content…
The first legal issue is in relation to tort law. As tort law currently stands if a permit is ordered from the Court to detain a woman that is pregnant against her wishes but in order to protect the unborn child she is currently caring. Her actions will harm the child overall. The second legal issue comes from the other perspective. If the Court does have the power to make orders based on the protection of children (or unborn children), and can this be extended to protect the child against the mothers …show more content…
However, there are main elements of the legal liberalism theory. The first one is “judges don’t just ‘find the law’, they ‘formulate it’”. This means that judges adjust the law to fit modern day society but the legislature formally fixes it. The next element is judges do not form their idea of what justice is based on rules or precedents, they start from what they believe justice is. The next one is every choice they make they do not just look it up in law they have to make many choices before they come to a conclusion. They draw on previous cases, the persons record, the laws and many other things. It is not just a simple minded decision; the answer is not there in law. The final element of legal liberalism is, that you must look at all the factors that have an effect on the legal actors when the judges are making choices. The majority decision relates to legal liberalism in many ways. The majority decision in this case reflects legal liberalism in many ways. Firstly, legal liberalism protects peoples’ liberty in this case, the only person’s liberty to be protected here was that of the mothers. Her unborn child under Canadian law is not a legal person. In the law’s eyes there was no person to liberty to protect here besides the respondent. “ If it was not a legal person and possessed no legal rights at the time of the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Case Reflection: State Paternalism and Pregnant Women The case of “State Paternalism and Pregnant Women” is overwhelmingly fascinating as well as very controversial. In fact, this case was so controversial it went all the way to the Supreme Court before a decision was finally reached. Personally, I was unsure of where I stood on this specific issue the first time I read it but ultimately I came to agree with the supreme court’s decision that protected the right of pregnant women from being arrested due to positive drug tests that were given to the police, without the patient’s knowledge or consent. Although I find this case very intriguing, I chose this case to do a reflection on based upon the overwhelming amount of ethical questions…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hodgson Case Doctor Jane Hodgson performed an illegal abortion on a woman who was in danger of infection if her child was born since the child was infected. She turned herself into the police in order to change the law of abortion in Minnesota. She was convicted in the trial court. Hodgson appealed to the Minnesota Supreme Court they also ruled that Hodgson was guilty and so Hodgson took the case to the US Supreme Court…

    • 202 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Mavis Baker Case Summary

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Canada case in a way in which the facts are stated accurately. However, there is the possibility that a legal positivist would also explain this case in a more biased manner by considering Ms. Baker’s arguments as extraneous. By understanding how this perspective would approach this case, the connection between morality and the law can be found in the ratio, and the significance of procedural fairness can be seen as articulated through the basic rule or principle in the case. A legal positivist would agree with a majority of the courts’ assessments, except the Supreme Court of Canada’s assessment; however, the assessment of a legal positivist could also be considered as incorrect. Yet, if the legal positivist were to look at this case through a slightly different view, they would agree with the Supreme Court’s assessment and be considered correct.…

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    R V Labaye Case Study

    • 1458 Words
    • 6 Pages

    This essay will discuss the case of R v. Labaye. A summary of the nature of the proceeding and the judges writing decision, facts, legal issues, the decision, judicial reasoning and a thorough analysis will be addressed in this essay. I prefer the reasoning of the majority decision as it is reasonable and ethical. The nature of the proceeding is an appeal heard from the Supreme Court of Canada.…

    • 1458 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Supreme Court of Canada is the highest court in Canada, the final court of appeal, and the last legal resort for all litigants; therefore, the Supreme Court of Canada decisions are the ultimate expression and application of Canadian law (Supreme Court of Canada tour). The landmark decision by the Supreme Court of Canada in the R v. Keegstra case regarding the freedom of expression portrays the theoretical concepts behind the court’s ruling as it is the job of the court to deliver a fair decision to the parties involved, as well as a decision that maintains law and order in society. The R v. Keegstra ruling contains insights from the consensus theory and the labelling theory, as the decision of the court was in the interest of the public. To better understand a criminal law case and come up with a conclusion, the theory used must have a valid structure and must follow the rules of critical thinking and logic (Boyd, Cartwright and Heidt, 2015: 120). Also, the purpose of the criminal law must be understood as criminal law serves a purpose, which takes into account some theoretical aspects of the consensus theory and…

    • 1338 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    b. Social Reform in Women’s Rights & Abortion Roe v. Wade, a case regarding a pregnant single woman, Roe, challenges the constitutionality of Texas criminal abortion laws, which would not perform abortions unless the pregnancy would put the mother’s life in risk or if medical advice is given to the mother to not carry out her pregnancy. The rulings of this case was 7-2 in favor of Roe, the court states that it was unconstitutional because it violated the 14th Amendment for Texas’ state abortion laws to only allow forth abortions only when the mother’s life is at stake(Roe v. Wade). The court ruled that women have the right of privacy when it came to deciding whether they should bear children. The court also decided that the woman’s health is in the interest of the state, that the woman can decide up to the second trimester whether or not to undergo an abortion, but when the third trimester start, the state has the right to preserve the fetus’ life unless…

    • 1832 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    In the majority opinion, it is written, “Men and women of good conscience can disagree…about the profound moral and spiritual implications of terminating a pregnancy, even in its earliest stage. Some of us as individuals find abortion offensive to our most basic principles of morality, but that cannot control our decision. Our obligation is to define the liberty of all, not to mandate our own moral…

    • 1496 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Reagan presents an excellent and thorough study of the medical, social, and legal aspects of abortion. Her study portrays the widespread practice and acceptance of abortion in a time where it was criminalized in the United States. She addresses an era of abortion that few historians do, the time between the criminalization of abortion in the nineteenth century to its legalization in 1973. Arguably the greatest strength of her work is how she integrated her national analysis of abortion law with local regulation and stories of individual practitioners. It links the life of everyday people and local practices to national public policy.…

    • 1714 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Raynne Alston Eng111 Writing Project 3 Abortions The purpose of this essay is to describe the controversy of abortions, also to describe how it relates to a poem written by Sojourner Truth “Ain’t I a Woman?”. Initially I chose this topic because it was relatable but I came to the realization that it is not a new issue and it links directly into the women’s suffrage movement in the 1800s.…

    • 903 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The topic of abortion has always been a controversial issue. There are, and will always be, many different views concerning the ethical acceptability, social stigma, and morality of abortion. While there had already been attempts to properly emphasize women’s civil rights in society, it wasn’t until the emergence of a case like Roe v. Wade that brought to the public eye the legal issue of a woman’s right to receive an abortion, as well as her rights as a person and citizen. Even though this case was based more on the legality and right to privacy and personal freedoms, the legal issues surrounding a woman’s right to abortion was the true start of the women’s liberation movement. The Supreme Court’s decision of Roe v. Wade to legalize abortion…

    • 1353 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Roe Vs Wade Research Paper

    • 1275 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Roe v. Wade was the Supreme Court case that led to the legalization of abortion in the United States. By the time Roe v. Wade was introduced, abortion had seemed to be a settled social issue in America. However, by the 1960’s, political factions and campaigns were rising up and stirring the waters of reproductive rights. Abortion had changed during the courses of the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries, becoming a private practice of the people to a great political divide. Abortion was actually easily accessible during the Twentieth Century, but the ride of religious fundamentalism compelled citizens to become involved in either the protection of the fetus or the defense of reproductive rights.…

    • 1275 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Roe Vs. Wade Trial

    • 654 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The decision made in the Roe vs Wade trial directly relates to much of what we deem familiar in the United States of America, most of which relates to the exploration, exchanges and encounters we face today. Abortion has been a controversial topic for over a decade and majority ethical or political debates begin and ultimately cease with the ruling that ended the Roe vs Wade trial. The problems being faced surrounded by abortion did not develop overnight, the difficulties being faced with abortion had started long ago. The Roe vs Wade trial was the final stepping stone into the exploration of the world and substantially the United States with the views of the citizen's. This first and deciding trial has profoundly impacted the topic of abortion,…

    • 654 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Federal Government Should Outlaw Late-Term Abortion In 2013, reporter Sarah Terzo from Live Action News in Virginia indicated that late-term abortion clinic shoots babies through the heart with poison in order to kill them. This example is a good reason to why the federal government should be outlawing late-term abortion. No matter what situation the mother and fetus are in, every fetus should have the right to live a meaningful life. However, the federal government should outlaw abortion after the first trimester because many of the practices are inhumane, all fetuses should have the right to live, and the ways abortion can cause risks for the women. Late-Term Abortion Being Inhumane…

    • 1331 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    bortion has been debated before the Roe v. Wade ruling; it has been a debate throughout history. Abortion is “...a procedure performed to end a pregnancy before birth occurs.” The procedure is dependant on the women’s “...choice, health, and how long she has been pregnant… [and] the legality of the procedure.” There are two methods of abortion performed: medical abortion and surgical abortion. A medical abortion is a procedure where drugs such as mifepristone and misoprostol are used in order to end a pregnancy.…

    • 772 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Abortion Is Wrong

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages

    A fetuses right to live surpasses a women's right to privacy. The woman made the mistake of not using protection and shouldn't take it out on the innocent human being that doesn't have anything to do with that. Abortion takes away the child's life, freedom and chance at happiness. The mother will think of the child as an object, not as a human child, to justify their choices. Even though they are in control of this child's life or death, it doesn't give them the right to kill it.…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics