Provisional Government's Decision To Defeat

Improved Essays
'The Provisional Governments decision to continue the war doomed it to defeat'. Explain why you agree or disagree with this view.
It has been suggested that the 'Provisional Governments decision to continue the war doomed it to defeat'. There is evidence to support this view as due to the government’s preoccupation with winning the War, many economic and social problems were overlooked or ignored and many individuals were becoming discontented. Which in turn turn lost the provisional government masses of support. There is also evidence to challenge this view as army officers were generally in support of the provisional government and continuing the war. Additionally, there were many other factors which contributed to the failure of the provisional government and not this decision alone. Overall however it is clear from the evidence that this view is accurate and that the decision to
…show more content…
However the provisional Government did not consider what the public wanted and ordered an attack. This could be considered a key factor as the Provisional Government effectively acted in the same way as the Tsar and failed to listen to what many people wanted. 1.7 million Russian soldiers were killed in world war one and the blame was being placed both on the Tsar and the government, whereas the Bolsheviks were offering an end to the war that took so many lifes. Further evidence to support this view is that supplies and food were sent to the front line, this resulted in food shortages in the cities which is why Lenins slogans of "peace, bread, land" were becoming more appealling to the population as it appeared that he was a leader willing to deal with the problems Russia was facing. Russia's transport system was inadequate to meet the demands for war; because of this it soon broke down under the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    That it would be so much better and easier if the generals that declare the war do the fighting themselves. Even though this is…

    • 1052 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It was difficult to find out right or wrong during the time of war. Everyone was sacrificing something they liked. Although it seemed like that the rebels were the crudest men in the world, Is it the truth? I understood that everyone looked at the war with their own perspective which contained biasses. After reading some chapters about the wars and its effect brutalizing children and people, I searched some information about this war, tried to teach myself looking at the war in an objective way, and learned more background before I judged this war in my…

    • 448 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Australian response to the outbreak of the First World War in 1914 has been widely regarded by historians, as deeply supportive and in favour of the commitment to enter the conflict. The newspapers and the actions of many men and women as war broke out, displayed that a patriotic front was present among Australians. Carl Bridge is of the opinion that Australia was highly motivated and unanimously supportive towards the war. Other historians, such as Eric Andrews, however, are not convinced that there was unanimous support among the Australian people in response to the war, despite the positive front displayed through the media. Therefore, the Australian attitude to the war should not be regarded as entirely unanimous in support of the war,…

    • 1390 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    What was the impact of WWI on the Australian home front? The Impact: Political: 2 sides fighting for war and peace - The conscription - Conspiration War caused government to side. Economic: Women working Red Cross Trade…

    • 365 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As the decedents of the victorious, it is common practice to see the details of the war passed over for blanket decrees of victory due morality and numbers. However, in chapter 1 of Richard Overy’s book Why the Allies Won, the outcome of World War Two is broken down into issues of production, military reforms, moral, and unity examined in close detail. A forgone conclusion was not inevitable, and a deeper look must be taken in order to fully understand the Allies triumph. Around the beginning of World War 2 showed Allied forces that were severely down on their luck.…

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Question: How does Clausewitz's paradoxical trinity explain the changes to the character of warfare from the methods used by Frederick the Great to those that followed in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries? I. Thesis: Clausewitz’s paradoxical trinity explains the changes to the character of warfare from the ‘political-ideological French Revolution ’ to the ‘military revolution of the Great War ’ by acknowledging the variable but compelling relationships between: instruments of subordination such as government and policy; the implementation of ‘courage and talent ’ in the ‘realm of probability and chance’ by the military commander and his forces; and the resolve of the people, on all sides of the conflict. I. Major Point…

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Russian Revolution Dbq

    • 1641 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The Russian population gave up on the ideals of a tzar or an absolute monarchy. They felt that the people in Russia got no say in the government and the government is only by the tzar for the tzar. Many of the Russian people were looking for different governments and many thought that communism was the best choice of government for Russia. To understand why the rise of communism was helped lead the Russian’s chant of “Peace, Bread, and Land” we have to look at Russia before revolution. From the source written by the Russian Conservative, who were a bunch of members from the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th dumas, stated in their journal “The Months Before the Russian Revolution” “The war failures, the tension which is getting too much of us, the general exhaustion, which is plainly developing into a refusal to go with the war.”…

    • 1641 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Overy, R. J. Why the Allies Won. New York: W.W. Norton, 1995. In Why the Allies Won, Richard Overy gives the reader a chance to challenge the “inevitable” outcome of World War II. Allied victory may be viewed as certainty now, but during the war, it was not.…

    • 1113 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Fallacy In Ww1

    • 1043 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Because of the lack of American action, Germany decided to take the matter into their own hands utilizing a new weapon of war: the Unterseeboot, or submarine. In March 1915, the a German U-boat sunk the HMS Falaba, which had on board an American, the first killed by either side in the conflict. German U-boats sunk other ships, the Arabic, Lusitania, and the Sussex throughout the war. Each time Germans inflicted major American civilian casualties, the United States government warned Germany of the illegality of such actions and their possible repercussions. After the sinking of the Lusitania, in which over one hundred Americans died, Lansing contended that America should adopt a firmer stance towards Germany, claiming that since the American…

    • 1043 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Groupthink is a phenomenon that occurs when the desire for harmony and compliance within a group leads people to operate in a way that can reach a faulty decision. (Janis,1972) Historically, there are many examples of groupthink decisions made by corporations, governments, or other types of organization or group. In this paper, we will examine an important aspect of Modern Greek history that changed not only its borders, but also the population characteristics of certain areas.…

    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    in his message in 1942 president Roosevelt stated part way threw A man will sacrifice not only his pleasures not only his goods not only his associations with those he l “loves but his life itself. In time of crisis when the future is in the balance we come to understand with full recognition and devotion what is and what we owe to it.” Was he really dedicated to his people and his century or was it all a lie we will prove his innocents. we believe that President Roosevelt is innocent and we will prove it to you in these ways Arguments and brief— argument one the evacuations were military necessity Argument two government provided compensation and our third argument is that sacrifices are made in war and this was another sacrifice.…

    • 568 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    World War II: A Different Look Imagine a world in which America had actually lost World War II. Consider the impact the Nazi’s would have had on the world if they were to win. It can be hard to determine as there can be multiple scenarios to how this would play out. Along with this, there is no true way to determine what would have happened. The book, “The Man in The High Castle” takes a look at what the world would be like if the Axis powers had won World War II.…

    • 1140 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The tsarist regime essentially broke its own economy in order to supply its military so it could fight in the in the First World War. Though there were certain sectors of the Tsarist Russian economy that were relatively well developed, or beginning to develop (particularly industry), just prior to the outbreak of the First World War, 'the system into which they fitted was still archaic.' The pre-war economy was underdeveloped and the transportation network was in no way prepared to deal with the strain of supplying the army on the front lines. In fact, 'the scarcity of means of transportation paralyzed all attempts to modernize the economy' as the train lines were miniscule, especially in comparison to the other nations Russia would either be allied with or fighting in the coming…

    • 1161 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the opinion of George Buchanan, British ambassador to St Petersburg from 1910, “The emperor Nicholas was one of the most pathetic figures in history, he was so unfitted for the role and never really governed Russia.” The industrial revolution throughout russia had just been started at the time of the First World War, this is partly to blame for the fall of the Romanov Dynasty. Due to late industrialisation, the economy of russia was very weak, leading to there being no way for russia to provide for its people, soldiers and even war supplies. The russian army was even left with ridiculous supplies, many soldiers fighting barefoot and without weapons.…

    • 1200 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Adrian Gregory 's "The Last Great War" is a convincing attempt to challenge popular and historical memory of World War 1. Gregory opens by explaining the popular perception of World War 1 as being "stupid, tragic and futile". Increasingly, the British have renounced World War 1, describing it as being "... An apocalyptic fall from grace... The definitive bad war".…

    • 789 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays