Gun Control By Adam Gopnik Analysis

Improved Essays
Virginia Tech in Blacksburg, Virginia on April 16, 2007, Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut on December 14, 2012, and lastly the movie theater in Auro, Colorado on July 20, 2012. If you have not figured it out already, you may be wondering what those places have in common. The three places listed above are all famous locations where mass shootings have occurred in the United States within the past eight years. Since all of these major shootings, everyone is asking the same question: Should more gun laws be added to the Constitution? I believe that the answer is no. In fact, my opinion is the more gun laws we added would not stop people who are determined for whatever reason to go on a killing spree. I think more gun laws or …show more content…
Many people believe that with more effective gun laws they would be safer. In the article "The Simple Truth About Gun Control" by Adam Gopnik, he explains that a majority of children would have been saved with effective gun laws. Gopnik also interprets that making guns harder to get would make the crime harder to commit, and it would become much rarer. Lastly he expresses that, "more guns=more homicides" (Gopnik). All the points Gopnik explores are important, but he is misunderstanding how many people need guns in the United States for self-defense, and to survive for food like hunting. For example many people have guns in case they needed to use self defense because it gives them a sense of security; however, others use guns to hunt for food because for some people that would be their only means of survival. He is neglecting to consider that more gun laws would not bring back lost loved ones nor would it stop criminals from killing innocent people. Lastly, he is ignoring the fact that the right to bear arms is a constitutional …show more content…
In the article "The Reasonable Right To Bear Arms" by Adam Winkler, he explains the founding era of citizens took up guns to defend the nation and did not want government to take reasonable regulations of guns from gun owners. He says this to show the citizens who came up with the right to bear arms, never saw guns as a threat; guns were strictly used to defend our country, which is why we have one of the best armed forces we have today. He states, "The Second Amendment was about ensuring public safety"(Winkler). By saying this, Winkler proves that the Second Amendment was established so more families would feel safe and secure in their homes, not terrified of who may walk into their home. Guns should not be outlawed because the right to own guns was founded as the Second Amendment for a way of protection and

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The 2nd Amendment states, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed”. Many Americans believe in and benefit from this right, however, the freedom to bear arms at times may come with significant and sometimes deadly consequences. The right to bear arms is a relatively easy process. Americans are victims to innocent deaths such as murders and accidental shootings due to the ease at which one can own a gun.…

    • 555 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Why Do Guns Save Lives

    • 148 Words
    • 1 Pages

    People know that guns can cost lives because the media repeat this message endlessly, as if we could not figure it out for ourselves. But even someone who reads newspapers regularly and watches numerous television newscasts may never learn that guns also save lives. The honest measure of the protective benefits of guns are the lives saved, the injuries prevented, the medical costs saved, and the property protected. Only 0.1% (1 in a thousand) of the defensive uses of guns results in the death of the…

    • 148 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    I feel that people should be allowed to have guns, but I also believe in order to maintain one, they shall do a background and medical check on the person before allowing purchase. Sanders argues over gun control during his debate against Clinton and O’Malley because Sanders voting against legislation congress of allowing background checks in order to purchase a gun. Clinton disagrees because of how many people have died due to guns, she argues how many shootings have an occur killing many innocent…

    • 1103 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Second Amendment of the Bill of Rights states clearly that the people’s right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed on. This has led to one of the most complicated and volatile issues in America today. People on both sides of this issue have strong beliefs. Some argue that when our founding fathers wrote the bill of rights, the guns were not as deadly as the ones available today. Supporters of the Second Amendment today argue that people’s right should not be infringed on no matter what.…

    • 1041 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Second Amendment Out the ten Bill of Rights, the second amendment is the most important for many reasons. The second amendment is the most important because it gives us the right to own guns and even use them if necessary. Some examples of the second amendment being the most important will be explained.…

    • 546 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When the founding fathers of the United States wrote the Constitution, they added the Bill of Rights which is a set of the first the ten amendments of to the Constitution. The second of these amendments, states that "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." (U.S Const. Amend II). Particularly, this amendment is interpreted in many ways; some pro gun-control groups say only militias are allowed to bear arms, and pro gun groups say that every citizen is allowed to bear arms.…

    • 1790 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Due to our limited amount of resources, the military can’t keep all of its citizens safe. Therefore, the second amendment was passed and ratified onto the constitution. The amendment stated, “A well-regulated militia being necessary to the security of a…

    • 856 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Mass Shootings The anti-gun crowd would like us to believe that with more guns, comes more gun violence, but since more and more states have allowed people to carry a side arm, crime has declined. Can these things be a mere coincidence? Perhaps, but even if that’s true, it still proves that allowing law abiding citizens to be armed does not increase crime, and suggest that it contributes to lowering it instead (Federal Bureau of Investigation, n.d.). Something else to ponder is where do mass shootings occur?…

    • 2181 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One reason that the guns should not be banned is "the Second Amendment of the United States Constitution protects individual gun ownership" ( "Should More"). This means that the people of the United States have the right to own a gun…

    • 1266 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Second Amendment

    • 1577 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The Founding Fathers of the United States wrote the Second Amendment to the Constitution for a reason; to protect the rights of the people. This means that citizens have the privilege and ability to possess a gun and use than gun for lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home. The government has no right to restrict them in owning guns for this reason. Further amending the right to own a gun would only do more harm than good in the United States. By creating stricter gun control laws, the government would not solve the problem of criminals obtaining weapons and would only take away the protection of the people.…

    • 1577 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gun Control Research Paper

    • 1364 Words
    • 6 Pages

    An incendiary debate has been sparked regarding current gun control legislation in the United States, because approximately 30,000 United States citizens lose their lives to gun-related crime and injury every year (Terror). The question is whether gun control laws should be strengthened to make it harder for potential criminals to possess weapons or kept the same to preserve the rights of the United States citizens. Gun control opponents believe that the answer to this problem is to loosen gun control laws to dissuade potential shooters. Gun control proponents believe that the answer is to tighten gun control laws so that a gun is never put into a potential shooter’s hands. To examine this issue, one must carefully ponder different points of…

    • 1364 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The right to bear arms has been topic of discussion among people since ancient times. Political theorist John Locke viewed possession of arms as a personal freedom one should abstain. The Second Amendments purpose and meaning has been a key controversy. The Amendment adopted in 1791, was constructed so each state maintained a militia, composed of everyday citizens who served as part time soldiers which were well regulated. People feared the federal government would use its standing army to go against its will on the states, the authors of the second amendment intended to protect the states militias’ right to bear arms.…

    • 1478 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gun Control and the Second Amendment According to Schulman (1991), the text of the Second Amendment of the US Constitutions reads as follows: “a correctly structured militia, for purposes of state security; the right of the citizens to have and to carry arms shall not be challenged.” This is a paraphrased version of what is contained in the original constitutional document. Nonetheless, it captures the spirit of the constitution regarding the issue of guns and their possession thereof.…

    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to Jill Lepore, a Harvard professor of United States History, a 1991 poll in the US found that people were more likely to know of the Second Amendment: the “right to bear arms” than they were to know the First: the freedom of speech, religion, and assembly (Lepore). This startling fact clearly shows that US citizens prioritize guns very highly, perhaps over our own freedom. However, the interpretation of the Second Amendment as the right of citizens to carry any and all types of guns wherever they want, is misconceived. The actual Amendment states “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed”. At the time the Amendment was written,…

    • 1854 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Guns are designed to kill people. They should be made illegal because the only reason a person would need a gun is to either kill an animal or a human. Some may argue that the 2nd amendment protects their rights as citizens to own a firearm but it was also created 224…

    • 918 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays