I still
I still
Some would say that that the framers of the Constitution limited the power of the President enough by giving some powers to congress, but the more valid perspective is that the framers of the Constitution did not limit the President’s powers enough because some powers of Congress have changed to be the President’s powers. In the constitution, the President has many powers such as being Commander in chief of the army, appointing ambassadors and supreme court justices, and making sure laws are faithfully executed. The President has all of these powers, but more recently, the President has taken over some powers that Congress is supposed to have. The framers of the Constitution gave the President too many powers.…
It can be argued that the president is not in charge of creating legislation, and that the president is to play a role in foreign relations, and that by giving him, the president, the power of the military, that in itself is an argument made by those that support ratification. However, the power to declare war rests in congress and not the president, in which the president is only in charge of the military when war has been declared. The imbalance of power between the three branches of government is a problem that the constitution creates, but that is not the only problem. The other problem that the constitution creates is that the federal government does not provide specific liberties within itself in which the federal government will protect. Those…
The framers of the Constitution designed the office of president to be a rather weak one. Given the original government presented in the Articles of Confederation, an example was followed while writing the Constitution. Congress was given more power and influence over the nation, and dominated the executive branch until the 1930s. The president, while being granted some powers,…
After winning the Revolutionary War, the Americans began writing constitutions for each of the states. Since they left Britain because of their tyrannical and unfair leader, they were very fearful of that happening again. To prevent this, the states made their constitutions limit the power of leaders and put systems in place to prevent tyranny. In 1776, New Hampshire was the first state to make its own constitution.…
If the Supreme Court didn't have the power to overturn unconstitutional federal laws, then who would? Without the supreme court, the other two branches will be overpowering. The United States can’t have a workable system of the government without the judicial branch. The Judicial branch act as a tiebreaker for the legislative branch and executive branch. And those three are the reason to prevent the government from overpower.…
This is largely the case because the president sees his position as one that does not need Congressional approval under the faithfully executed clause in the oath of office which is largely interpreted on a subjective basis. Which means that under the constitution, as commander and chief, a present sees is position as one that does not need Congresses’ approval and that such legislation violates the constitution as a whole. Essentially, the president understands the wording in the constitution to mean that the positon of president, and that position alone, has sole authority over the armed…
Congress itself has given the president powers that it does not constitutionally have, and the constitution is vague in some areas so the president takes advantage of the opportunity. For example, when he deploys troops to war without congressional approval because the constitution says he is the commander in chief. The role of the president has changed from weak to a strong one because he has more powers than the founding fathers intended. Institutional, cultural, and policy changes have altered the role of the Presidency because they caused the president’s power to strengthen and ultimately giving the impression that the president is the most…
Though the ability for congress to govern itself could allow to some corruption, it is not a huge concern. Ultimately, if the congress got too corrupt it would simply get elected out of office at the end of a term. It is unclear just how far the necessary and proper extends, which is a much more dangerous proposition. Though the president does have veto power, and the judicial branch has the option of constitutional review, having the ability to do what is necessary and proper is far too dangerous and vague a power to grant.…
Even the President’s check on Congress, a Presidential veto, can then be reversed by a two thirds majority vote in congress. So while the President does have power, in almost every case, that power is limited in one way or…
POLS 301_3/31/17_Penelope Kahn pg1 Foreign Policymaking The creation and implementation of the separations of power, which supports a system of branches of government that incorporate checks and balances are important elements, to which the United States Constitution is founded and are what makes the United State’s structure of governing unique to all other nations. By dividing the government into three branches of government encourages checks and balances to be employed as internal controls that place limitations of power within the US government, therefore preventing a single system of government or political party from wielding too much power. The development…
The power of the Executive Branch is limited through judicial review, which is a process where legislative action must be reviewed by the judicial branch to make sure it conforms with the constitution. Therefore, the president isn’t able to freely make decisions that could hurt the…
One important way they did it is by in the Constitution they listed the powers of the president. In the Constitution, they list specifically what the powers of the president are and are not. In the Constitution they made the president “commander in chief”. As the commander in chief, the president can veto a law, but, Congress can override a veto. Also, even though Congress declares war, the president is the commander in chief of all armed forces.…
The Power of the federal government relative to the power of the states has increased since the ratification of the Constitution. The two following provisions of the Constitution, the necessary and proper clause and the power to tax and spend, have been used over time to expand the federal power. The necessary and proper clause as stated in the constitution is used by Congress to make laws that allow the government to carry out their powers. This has expanded federal power because it provides the potential to develop the national government's expressed powers so that when they become appropriate or needed, the passing of laws, that relate to the power, allows for it to become used in a broader sense.…
The importance of restricting presidential power in Korea was undeniably proven during the often-brutal regimes that ruled the South before 1987. This was especially prominent during the terms of Park Chung-hee and Chun Doo-Hwan, the latter of which was responsible for the infamous Gwangju Massacre in 1980. The origins of these regimes, however, began in the establishment of the 1948 constitution, which in the words of Yeh “…adopted a presidential system that failed to provide sufficient checks and balances in relation to the presidency” (Yeh 912). These initial failures to create a balanced and limited presidency, which eventually led to the removal of term limits by Syngman Rhee. These actions provided the means for future Korean dictators,…
Understanding the relationship between the president and congress is key in understanding American politics. Congress and the president cannot avoid engaging with one another, with a constitutional set up that demands they work together constructively. Congress has its roles to play in policy making as does the president. The president and congress are given certain powers in the constitution, that power is divvied up, so that neither one of these branches has too much power at one time (Fisher 2007). The founders of the constitution were very distrustful of the presidency and feared if the president was given too much power it would lead to demagogy (Dickinson 2008).…