Essay On Prayer In Public Schools

Improved Essays
Roger Williams said it best when he stated, “No one should be bound to worship, or to maintain a worship [taxes to an established church] against his own consent" (Karsten). This is why required prayer in public schools is such an argumentative topic in today’s society. In 1962, required prayer was taken out of schools across the United States (Pros and Cons of Prayer). However, individual prayer is still allowed and acceptable, somewhat. Teachers and faculty members may not participate in prayer while in the presence of students. Students may practice prayer on their own, but it cannot be forceful or vocal. They can also share with other students about prayer, but cannot force them to listen or share the same belief (Religion in Public Schools). Is this right? Fifty-five percent of America’s general population believe there are too little religious influences (Pros and Cons of Prayer). Nevertheless, what about the other forty-five percent? It would be an uproar to try to compensate the needs of a country when its people are split so evenly. The country’s various cultures can be compromised if we demand prayer rather than leaving it to be a voluntary act. However, a moment of silence after the Pledge of Allegiance can be a …show more content…
They claimed their daughter’s eighth grade graduation ceremony was unfair because a rabbi prayed during the program. They felt offended because they were not Jewish. Consequently, this situation was taken to court. This particular trial travelled all the way to the Supreme Court and became know as Lee versus Weisman. In the end, however, Nathan Bishop Middle School won when they claimed that prayer at these type ceremonies are important to most people, and that the Weisman’s did not have to participate in prayer if they chose not to do so (Lee v Weisman,

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Recently, it has come to agreement that students do not have to say the pledge because of the phrase, “under God”. This phrase can be considered praying and praying was made illegal in all public schools. Public schools got rid of starting the day with prayer because it offended some people and their religions. The praying aspect of publics schools was removed because it went against people’s religions or just made people uncomfortable. As more ethnic groups and religions started to come to America and go to school, the more people were becoming offended by the pledge. This is seen when FindLaw states, “As immigration multiplied the ethnic and religious identities of Americans, modernization efforts led by education reformer like Horace Mann gradually minimize religions influences in schools.” (FindLaw 2013) This shows that people did not like being told what to believe and say especially when it came to religion. They exchanged it with the moment of silence instead. So when prayer was removed, people starting to think about more things that could offend others and the Pledge of Allegiance was the next on the list. Many students refused to say the Pledge or their parents were placing lawsuits against the schools for forcing their children to say the Pledge. Since we have freedom of speech and freedom of religion, we do not have to be forced into…

    • 1576 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I feel as though the court didn’t correctly uphold the first amendment’s right to religious freedom. Citizens should be able to conduct prayers to their gods freely. According to the Constitution, the right of religious freedom is protected by the government. However, the court’s verdict of Engel v. Vitale placed an unjust limitation on religious freedom. As stated in the case, the prayer was not mandatory. All students had an option as to whether they wanted to participate in it or not. Therefore, the prayer was not being forced upon the students. In my opinion, the school board’s prayer was within the guidelines of the Constitution. There was no reason to prohibit the practice of reciting the prayer. Those of that religion simply wanted to start their day with a prayer that incorporated the morals they believed were just. Nevertheless, the Supreme Court took away their freedom to pray publicly…

    • 901 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Engel Vs Vitale Analysis

    • 979 Words
    • 4 Pages

    At the beginning of a school day lesson the following prayer, consisting of 22 words, ‘Almighty God, we acknowledge our dependence upon Thee, and we beg Thy blessings upon us, our parents, our teachers and our country. Amen.’, was recited due to the approval of the New York state board of regents (state board of education) in 1951. It was meant to teach good character and citizenship in the students. The ruling did prohibit schools from writing or reciting a specific prayer and requiring all students to say it. The majority stated that allowing students to absent themselves from this activity did not make the law constitutional because the purpose of the First Amendment was to prevent government interference with religion.…

    • 979 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are many in the world who oppose prayer rights in schools. Many believe it would be a terrible burden on many schools. Teaching is not the purpose of any public school, and they are not trained or equipped to do it. The purpose of school is to learn everything outside of religion. Many would argue that there are places to go to pray like churches or at home. Prayer in schools can lead into violence among many of the students. Students are at risk of getting bullied or even forced into hating religion by other children. Among the many valid reasons, the separation of church and state stand the tallest. "Separation of church and state" is a phrase used by Thomas Jefferson and others expressing an understanding of the intent and function of the Establishment Clause and Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. “Increasing levels of religious pluralism in the modern world raise tensions among religious groups and challenge the inherited state-church models of our nation” (Monsma, Soper). Despite all the negative remarks directed towards prayer in schools, prayer shows morality. Prayer can help guide students to make the right decisions, and better choices throughout the school year. Prayer can help many students relieve stress before a test or a big basketball game. Every student needs to be allowed to express who they…

    • 1062 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Lee v. Weisman case is about a middle school principal invited a rabbi to speak at the graduation. Weisman tried to get a temporary restraining order to stop the rabbi from speaking at the graduation. The question is does the inclusion of clergy who offers prayers at public schools ceremonies violate the establishment clause of the first amendment. The decision was it does.…

    • 244 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Prayer in school is constitutional and enforces the concept freedom of religion stated in the First Amendment that the United States was established upon. By prohibiting school prayer the Supreme Court has mistaken the first clause of the Constitution, which states: “Congress shall make no law respecting the establishment or religion, nor prohibiting the free exercise thereof” (10 reasons…).…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The first thing I noticed about this case was that this Supreme Court case all started because a PARENT had a problem with the school having their students recite a nondenominational prayer during class. From what I can understand after researching this Supreme Court case is that the student didn’t have a problem with reciting this prayer. He participated in the recitation of the prayer. It wasn’t until his father came to visit his son at school and saw that he was reciting this prayer, that he had a problem with it.…

    • 1944 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Missouri Public Prayer Amendment was put on the ballet on August 7, 2012. This amendment is supposed to “guarantee state residents of Missouri the right to express religious beliefs and also would allow students in public schools to pray and acknowledge their religion voluntarily”. Supporters say that this amendment will protect their rights to practice their own beliefs, while Opposers say that this amendment was not necessary because constitution already states that anyone can practice their religion in the state already. The Opposers went even further to say that this amendment will be only a temporary measure but soon enough cause problems in the future. The Opposers reasoning supports Madison’s argument about how the majority will…

    • 199 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    An Alabama law in 1978 authorized that teachers in public schools could take a minute of “silent mediation “ in the beginning of every school day. In 1981 it became a minute of “silent meditation or voluntary prayer”. Jeffree was a parent of three kids attending public school in Mobile County. His youngest kid was in kindergarten and got bullied by his peers because he refused to say the prayers. That’s when Jeffree decided to sue the school for violating the establishment clause of the first amendment because it exposed the kids to religious indoctrination.…

    • 810 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Vitale was correct. Although this case was the springboard for many of the more radical ideas of the likes of Madlyn Murray O’Hare, this case did uphold the ideas and beliefs of America’s Founding Fathers. Many have made the dispute over school prayer out to be a point of division in our nation. Yet the majority believes religion should be a part of our school systems. According to an article by John C. Green and James L. Guth, a “1983 Gallup poll found 81% of the “aware” public favoring a constitutional amendment allowing voluntary school prayer” (Green and Guth 41-42). In the years following the decision in the Engel v. Vitale case religion has been erased from our school systems. Although the majority feels there should be a time for personal prayer or meditation, no such allowance has come to fruition. I feel as though each person should be able to express their own beliefs in the manner they choose wherever they choose. I believe that if we were to allow the children of America to sit quietly for a moment and prayer in their own distinct way it would bring about a more open and tolerant viewpoint on one another’s…

    • 976 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Last month at Bremerton High school former marine, Joe Kennedy who is now an assistant Football Coach was asked to stop his “50-yard line” post game praying ritual. This ritual has never before been an issue, as he does it without bothering anyone or forcing anyone into joining prayer with him. It was not until a single parent complained that the school district noticed this and decided that even though his actions were “entirely well-intentioned” they had to take action against it. The grounds used for the complaint against Kennedy was that Bremerton is a public high school, therefore separation of church and state must be applied. With only one parent and the school district against his actions, Joe decided he was not going to back off of his “50-yard line” post game ritual, after all, he had plenty of people backing him up, including an atheist athlete and the athletes mother.…

    • 524 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    You begin your morning at school, standing to say the Pledge of Allegiance, then are forced to say a prayer praising Jesus and God for your independence. What if you don’t believe in Christianity? In the 1960’s, there was a law passed by New York, stating that public schools would open the day with the Pledge of Allegiance, then a non-denominational prayer in which students were to recognize their independence upon God. Then, in 1962, a parent sued on behalf of his child, arguing that the law violated the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment, as made applicable to the states through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The case was moved all the way to the Supreme Court, which resulted in a six to one vote in favor of the plaintiff. The judges stated that the school could not force children to pray, and if a student felt that the prayer was inappropriate, he or she could exclude oneself. The Supreme Court's ruling in Engel v Vitale was rightfully justified because school is an unbiased place for learning, there is the separation of church and state in the constitution, and the freedom of speech is one of the most vital rights of American citizens.…

    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Every morning in American public schools, the Pledge of Allegiance is announced to the students and staff to listen. Some may stand up, salute towards the American flag, and recite or listen along to the pledge. Others may choose to sit respectfully and pay attention. A simple morning routine for many schools roused a large debate over the requirement to salute the flag and recite the pledge. Should children be required to say the Pledge of Allegiance in all public schools? If they refuse, will they be punished and, if so, is that punishment “rightfully enacted”?…

    • 197 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The only person forced to state the prayer is the teacher. Students may stand in silence if they wish. The question for the Court is whether New York crosses a line by enacting this prayer. New York uses the same practice the Court does to open session. The Crier states, “God save the United States and this Honorable Court,” and Justices are free to pray if they wish (O’Brien 779). The New York prayer is only twenty two words, but not matter how short performing public prayer in a public school job is unconstitutional. Stating a prayer does not violate the Establishment Clause in a strict sense, but if government bankrolls religious practice in school it becomes influential. The First Amendment means the Government must be neutral towards religion. This prayer is not neutral (O’Brien…

    • 967 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Over the years, there has been a major conversational issue in the United States today about whether prayer should or should not be allowed in public schools. Prayer has already been banned in various numbers of public schools across the country. Many people have different religious views on this issue, but someone else’s religious view should not determine what someone else can do. The First Amendment states “freedom of religion”, so why can children not have this right in public school? There are plenty of different religions. They should all be able to pray if that is what they believe in and if that is what helps them get through their hard times. If prayer is not allowed in public school then why is there still “a moment of silence?” Public…

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays