Power And Empowerment Case Study

Improved Essays
1. Discuss the differences between power, influence, and empowerment.
Even though, there are differences among one another. Truly, they are essential ingredients of effective leadership. To put it differently, power involves controlling the behavior of others in a matter against their will. In contrast, influence involves leadership through competencies and trustworthiness without violating the followers’ free will. Although, empowerment is a process of motivation that encourages followers to do their best while creating a trusting and collaborative environment.

2. Using the following table, list advantages and disadvantages inherent in each method.
Method Advantages Disadvantages
Power - Ability to control behaviors of others.
- Opportunities
…show more content…
Why do you think empowerment is not as widely used as power or influence?
Generally speaking, empowerment is not widely used due to organizations are not willing to take the chance (risk) to fail. Moreover, organizations prefer to delegate instead of empower because leaders get to keep the control, decision-making authority, and monitor closely the work environment. For the most part, organizations are not willing to give their followers the total control of their task because it could constitute to an irresponsible behavior. In fact, empowerment has been only used a strategy and not as a means to achieve success within the workplace.

Case Study
Jim Braun is the president of the Student Oversight Group at Hanford College. The purpose of the Student Oversight Group is to handle problems that arise when students violate Hanford’s academic or personal conduct codes. The SOG includes the following members: Jim Braun 22/Senior Bus. Admin/Acct/ President Steve Baxter 21/Junior Computer Science Secretary Sarah Homer 25/Junior Social Work Treasurer Billi Schmidt 30/Senior Physical Education Member Robert Smith 20/Sophomore Graphic Design Member Brenda Miller 22/Senior Accounting Member Dr. Sandra Hardin History Faculty
…show more content…
The intruders took a few valuable items, including a clock radio, some books purchased for the spring semester, and his computer disks. One of the disks contained all the records (investigative information, minutes and decisions) of the SOG. One of the pending cases was due for final hearing and the disk contained all of the investigation information. The case involved a violation of the alcohol code and involved Robert Smith’s roommate Will Scott. Jim began investigating and found that there were only ten residents who had access to the dorm over the winter break. About a month passed, and no information surfaced about any of the missing items, except the SOG computer disk. Though other group members (Billi and Brenda), Jim heard that the disk was in Robert’s possession. Billi and Brenda did not know if Robert was involved in the theft, but they were quite sure he now had the disk. There is a SOG meeting scheduled next Friday and Robert will be attending, as will Billi and Brenda. At that meeting, a ruling will be made regarding Will Scott’s alcohol violation. Jim has spoken to the faculty advisor and has been informed that she will not be able to attend the meeting due to prior commitments out of town. In her absence, Jim has the full authority of the faculty advisor to discuss and make decisions regarding Will’s

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    As mentioned, since relationship developing does not fit well in the transactional model, leaders do not care whether their followers are satisfied as long as the task or performance is being done efficiently. Therefore, leaders should ensure followers at the time of achieving theirs’ objective, do not forced to violate the moral values, and at the same time adhere to the ethical standard of the organization. This is because leaders should have the initiative to guide theirs’ follower not to affect others interest while accomplishing their tasks and objective (Teck,…

    • 1449 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To successfully fill a leadership role, one must not want to simply control people, nor should one yearn for power, rather they should feel a necessity to guide people and coach them thoroughly. To be a leader is not the equivalence to a boss, the qualities and characteristics differ immensely. Exhibiting leadership must involve the ability to effectively communicate, display perseverance, and, among many other things, show a genuine enthusiasm. Communication is vital to any situation, but to effectively communicate is even more so in a position of leadership. There are ways to present words to whomever it may concern and ways not to do so; as this can affect people’s perception of not only you, but what you stand for.…

    • 792 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Without objectivity, the leader can be blinded of how to effectively employ motivational and inspirational techniques to support the program in leading change.2. Credibility and trustworthiness. Simply stated, that credibility is necessary to gain the confidence of the employees and peers to effectively implement change. This is specifically important in positive reinforcement. Without the confidence gained with credibility, this tool has no benefit or value for either the employee or the organization.3.…

    • 2382 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Character relates to one’s personal qualities, along with one’s moral commitments and values; therefore, one’s philosophy or principles reflect what one values while character is an active demonstration of what one values (Gini & Roland, 2014). The principle is rigid in that adapting to a specific project or person is difficult and change only occurs when there has been a shift in philosophy by the organization. Furthermore, the theory also hypothesizes that differences exist between leaders and managers. Managers govern for stability, have subordinates under their control, adopt well-defined short-term objectives, focus on details, and are task oriented. Leaders direct the overall process, have followers, concentrate on long-term vision, set the direction of the organization, and are inclined to inspire people in the organization to attain results (Carr, Johnson & Corkwell,…

    • 1113 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Principal-agent (PA) scholars usually focus on the difficulty with getting agents to expend more effort, known as the moral hazard problem. Even though agents and principals may share a common goal, agents have personal incentives to increase their own self-interests. These incentives can lead to tension between the goals of the principal and the execution of the task by the agents (Miller 2005). Agents may prefer to shirk and consequently the principal will suffer. PA scholars may argue that implementation varies because of the amount of effort agents expend.…

    • 1946 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They like to work independently so that they can get all the credit. However, it is hard to finish a task alone, people need to corporate with each other in a comapny. When narcissists are in a team, there is no way they can take all the credit so they rather not try hard. In this way, their teammates would not like to work with narcissists and the boss would also think less of them. Therefore, the lack of effort in a team will make narcissists less likely to get promoted in a…

    • 627 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A manager must know that a team avoiding conflict is not a positive thing. As seen in The 5 Dysfunctions of a Team story, when team members are not willing to discuss conflicting views, decisions often are not made. An example from the story being that the team had not made a decision about outsourcing IT, because they did not want to upset other people in the group. The end result of this kind of behaviour not only causes an organization to suffer, but often leaves everyone…

    • 1096 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The main reason why coercive influence is a non-factor for leaders, is it uses threats and punishments to entice followers to work towards a goal, but does not include the leaders working with the followers to achieve the goals as a team. Another reason why followers might respond to leadership initiative in a reward base, that includes them working together to achieve this goal, and in due of achieving it a team reward is given. Such as a team outing…

    • 1310 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is also important to take into consideration that leaders are human, and hence cannot think of everything. That is why there is a team of people; they create and bounce ideas off of each other. A leader’s job is not to dominate and force his or her ideas on followers. Leaders simply take the ideas and direct them…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    However, as Lunenburg. (2012) Comments power is often confused as leadership. This is caused by the central authority that leaders have. Leadership is not coercion. The difference between coercion and leadership is coercion strives to influence others through force to do something against their will.…

    • 1118 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays