Political Parties: Anti-Federalists, Whigs, And Tories

Improved Essays
Political Parties are composed for different reasons, for example, to help a specific political figure, to propel or boost a specific approach or a general ideological stance, to help certain groups in the society politically. From the earliest starting point of the United States, party or group such as, the Federalist, Anti-Federalist, Whigs, and Tories, has been dynamic, supporting different thoughts or plans. Tories were notoriously renowned as Pro-British before the American Revolution, and the Whigs are individuals who were Pro-American before the American Revolution; which were the most well regulated and structured out to help a specific reason(s) or idea(s).

The Federalists along with the Anti-Federalists emerged, exchanging support on obstructing and supposed Ratification of the Constitution.
…show more content…
The issue between them has skyrocketed as the newly establish government transitioning or becoming a Federal government which would determine how powerful the supposed government. Secretary of Treasury, Alexander Hamilton led the Federalist, which desires to a central government. On the other hand, led by Secretary of State, Thomas Jefferson, the Anti-Federalist, wanted states’ rights rather than centralized power. Nevertheless, George Washington was bothered by the partisan feud which later in his farewell speech warned them of the “…baneful effects of the spirit of party generally (Washington’s Farewell Address, 2).” Washington expressed his feeling towards the party system which he thinks that will just divide the will, determination, and the greater goal for the people. Forging party system(s) will actually divide the perception of the people – instead of having independent opinions and well structured government system for the country to prosper. It seems like the party system are for the candidates’ own good and benefits, not solely for the country to prosper

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    While trying to ratify the constitution two parties were formed, the Federalist and Anti-Federalist. Now the Federalist wanted a strong government with a strong executive branch. Now the Federalist felt that the Constitution was fine just the way it was, that there was no need for a Bill of Rights. The Federalist also believed that only the elite and educated should be eligible to lead the colonies. Alexander Hamilton was a great influence with the Federalist since he believed that they should have a strong National Bank to manage money across state borders.…

    • 364 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Washington stated in his farewell address of the dangers of the party system that was rising in the United States and believed the party system would lead to instability and division among the citizens of the United States. Washington’s warning was not heeded and the political parties rose in power for the next election growing the destabilization caused by the political parties. George Washington’s Presidential policies and actions created mostly a stable government with some slightly unstable policies and…

    • 1421 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Shortly after the ratification of the Constitution, George Washington unanimously won the presidential election of 1789. Striving towards a nation of unity, Washington set up a cabinet of four strong individuals in order to inaugurate a system of both balance and credibility. Although Washington was strongly against political parties, it wasn’t long until they began to emerge. Filling the cabinet with tension, Alexander Hamilton, Secretary of Treasury, and Thomas Jefferson, Secretary of State, brought upon new challenges for American politics in the eighteenth century, when they brought two very incompatible visions of what they hoped America’s future would look like to the plate. Additionally, their political and economic differences greatly…

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gage Lozano Perception Recently gaining independence from Great Britain was a notable achievement for the new country of America, but a great divide in the thoughts and actions that would determine the fate of the government became increasingly uneasy. Two opposing ways of thinking evolved and battled for how we would establish our country: the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists. While both seemingly concerned for the well being of the country, the predominant factor that separates Anti-Federalist Mery Otis Warren from Federalist James Madison is the perception they had over the citizens in their relation to the government. James Madison was concerned with the stability a republic could provide, while Mery Otis Warren wanted to ensure that the government was small, secure, and did not become to powerful or aristocratic. Raised by a wealthy family and very well educated, James Madison easily became a dominant figure in politics.…

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    George Washington’s last wish as president of the United States was for the political system to not be tainted by political parties; however, the Federalists and democratic republicans quickly destroyed any hope of this. Both sides had contrasting political views and steadfastly held their position. The leader of the democratic Republican Party, Thomas Jefferson, was a major advocate of states’ rights and fought venomously against Federalist policies such as the national bank. Yet, when he became president of the United States, his views started to change. Before his presidency, Jefferson was an ardent supporter of states’ rights and restricted government; however, once he became president, he began to use the government’s power for his benefit.…

    • 884 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    All though he was more favorable of the Federalist that had Alexander Hamilton which made Democrats like Thomas Jefferson very mad. Washington knew that political parties were beginning to spread, and in his inaugural address he explained how they would do nothing but bring hate to one another in our country. This worried Washington so greatly the majority and his farewell was explaining to his people that parties and sectionalism was not the way to go about things, in the long run it will only cease to gain power; "However [political parties] may now and then answer popular ends, they are likely in the course of time and things, to become potent engines, by which cunning, ambitious, and unprincipled men will be enabled to subvert the power of the people and to usurp for themselves the reins of government, destroying afterwards the very engines which have lifted them to unjust dominion. " All Washington wanted was for America to be a nation devoted to believing in one thing:…

    • 648 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    George Washington, being a wise and an experienced president, warned the individuals of the United States of America to not use factions, as this concept would not be beneficial for the newly made independent nation. Historical figures such as Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson decided not to listen to Washington’s plead. Both men created two political parties that reflected one another’s beliefs. Hamilton stood behind the Federalist party as Jefferson did the same for the Democratic-Republican party, which is also known as the Republicans. Each party had opposing views of one another.…

    • 1029 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Apush Dbq Analysis

    • 1179 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Newly attained independence upon the denouement of the Revolution, provoked fierce debate concerning the proper governmental path. America was divided into two factions: Federalists and Republicans. James Madison in unison with his fellow federalists pursued a centralized government and ratification of the Constitution. The Constitutional Convention of 1787 assembled to address the increasingly overt weaknesses in the Articles of Confederation.…

    • 1179 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During the period of Washington’s campaign the United States was fairly new and states for the most part governed themselves. States were governing themselves to exercise their new freedom from the centralized government that they all were use to with Great Britain. There were so many thoughts on how the new world should be constructed that this caused problems such as each state wanting their own to the laws of individual’s rights. The lack of a central set of laws l and the ability to control chaos when rebellions or other disturbances occurred was almost impossible. Individuals came together to try and uphold the new world that they had fought so hard to start, so this party moved forward with their vision for the United States.…

    • 554 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hamiltonians In The 1790s

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The people of the Early Republic of the 1790s had very distinct, opposing views of one another on how the government should operate under a new constitution. These disputes stemmed from the adoption of beliefs from Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson, who originally were highly opposed to factions. Their ideas were vastly accepted by two different groups: the Hamiltonians and the Jeffersonians. The many issues they disagreed on were nearly opposite one another, and ultimately lead to the creation of the first party system consisting of the Federalists and Republicans. Initially, these two men were very much against factions.…

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Political parties are such a key aspect to the society than the average United States citizen may think. They play an active role in our society and have been since the early days of America in the 1800’s. Looking back into history, it reveals the true functions of the political parties that play a factor into how the people of early America were impacted by them. The American government system would be nowhere if it were not due to the building of the political party groups. Many people know the political parties as two or more groups trying to fight each other for election, which is true, but they also check on the other party, influence the public, as well as inform the public about the other and any wrong doings that they commit.…

    • 1871 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dividing the parties almost completely in half were two groups with called the Federalists and Anti-Federalists. Anti-Federalists were more for a weak central government and more power to individual states, also their biggest argument was for a Bill of Rights. Now on the other hand the Federalists wanted a stronger central government and were against a Bill of Rights because they believed the government would give them rights. The Anti-Federalists main argument for a Bill of Rights was that there were certain rights that were guaranteed to people that the government should not infringe upon.…

    • 898 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    From 1787-1790 the American Constitution was debated by two opposing political philosophies named the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists. The Federalist were in favor of the newly formed Constitution while the Anti-Federalists objected the new constitution believing that the central government seized too much power by creating a single national government forcing the first Congress to establish a bill of rights to ensure the liberties that the Antifederalists felt the Constitution violated. The most significant topic of the debate the participation of the people in voting for ratification of the constitution. Pauline Maier in her article Take This or Nothing, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, illustrates reason the constitution was ratified…

    • 836 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Whig Party, which was formed in the early 1830’s, banded together a group of individuals who all opposed what was being called the domination of “King Andrew” Jackson. The name Whig was derived from the British party which was opposed to royal prerogatives. Jackson, who was victorious in 1828 and 1832, completely shattered the National Republican Party. Jackson’s actions with the Bank of America, the Native Americans, the Supreme Court, and his distasteful use of power as president regarding war, infuriated his political opponents. According to The Gale Group, “The Whig Party included former National Republicans, conservative factions of the democratic-republican party, and some former members of the Anti-Masonic Party.”…

    • 1534 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Both these parties often have different views on how the country should be run and different outlooks on political issues. With these two parties there is still one that is rarely spoken of one of which is the Federalist. The Federalist are supporters of the United States government a U.S. political party founded in 1787 to advocate the establishment of a strong federal government and the adoption by the states of the Constitution. By the 1820’s most of the federal principles had been adopted by the Democratic Party and the Federalist Party was no…

    • 722 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays