They argued that the privacy of the citizens is in danger. The number of the warrantless capture of video images and photos that are recorded are not assured whether their privacy is maintained or not. According to Michael D. White is a professor in Criminology and Criminal Justice. Some states require two parties consent before legal private videos or pictures are recorded. Moreover, audio is not lawful without the consent of all parties concerned ("police officer body-worn cameras"). Body-worn cameras record real time events of citizens who are sufferers of crime, in emergency situations, involved accidents, and those who are detained. The emotional suffering could be deteriorated when they learn that those experiences have been visually recorded. These may lead to lawsuits against the law enforcement. Unfortunately, there are allot of unanswered questions about the public
They argued that the privacy of the citizens is in danger. The number of the warrantless capture of video images and photos that are recorded are not assured whether their privacy is maintained or not. According to Michael D. White is a professor in Criminology and Criminal Justice. Some states require two parties consent before legal private videos or pictures are recorded. Moreover, audio is not lawful without the consent of all parties concerned ("police officer body-worn cameras"). Body-worn cameras record real time events of citizens who are sufferers of crime, in emergency situations, involved accidents, and those who are detained. The emotional suffering could be deteriorated when they learn that those experiences have been visually recorded. These may lead to lawsuits against the law enforcement. Unfortunately, there are allot of unanswered questions about the public