Ocampo was confused why a default was requested when the court date was not until January 29, 2016. The first actual notice Ms. Ocampo had of a 30 day requirement to submit a written documents in response was came when she again reviewed the Summons. Ms. Ocampo then called an attorney and scheduled the first appointment available to learn what the meaning of the documents were and what she must do to oppose the request for default and to state her side of the case. Ms. Ocampo believes she has a substantial legal and factual defense to the action, as shown by my proposed answer to the complaint served along with this motion and attached as Exhibit A to the Declaration of John Q. Goodrich,
Ocampo was confused why a default was requested when the court date was not until January 29, 2016. The first actual notice Ms. Ocampo had of a 30 day requirement to submit a written documents in response was came when she again reviewed the Summons. Ms. Ocampo then called an attorney and scheduled the first appointment available to learn what the meaning of the documents were and what she must do to oppose the request for default and to state her side of the case. Ms. Ocampo believes she has a substantial legal and factual defense to the action, as shown by my proposed answer to the complaint served along with this motion and attached as Exhibit A to the Declaration of John Q. Goodrich,