Case Study Of Margie Congden And Maple Meadows Turmoil

Great Essays
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA ) IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS )
COUNTY OF GREENVILLE ) FOR THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT )
Carl Ameche, ) ) C.A. NO.: 2016-CP-23-999999 Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) COMPLAINT
Margie Congden, Leroy Congden, ) (JURY TRIAL DEMANDED) and Maple Meadows Campground, ) ) Defendants. ) ) The Plaintiff, Carl Ameche (hereinafter “Ameche”), complaining of the Defendants, Margie Congdon (hereinafter “Congden”) and Maple Meadows Campground
(hereinafter “Maple”) would show unto this Honorable Court as follows:
JURISDICTION ALLEGATIONS
1. Ameche is a citizen and
…show more content…
Causing or allowing to exist a dangerous condition on the grounds;
c. Failing to warn of a dangerous condition for which Congden and Maple knew or should have known existed on the grounds;
d. Failing to use the care and caution that a reasonably prudent person would in the circumstances then and there existing.
As a direct and proximate result of the Defendants’ acts and/or omissions, the Plaintiff has suffered injuries and damages as set forth above, all of which are in direct violation of the common law and Statutes of the State of South Carolina.
15. Ameche is therefore informed and believes that he is entitled to judgment against Congden and Maple for actual and general damages as well as punitive damages.
WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff, Carl Ameche, prays for judgment against the Defendants, Margie Congden, Leroy Congden, and Maple Meadows Campground, for actual, consequential, special, and punitive damages in an amount to be determined by a jury, and for such other relief as the Court may deem just and proper.
Respectfully submitted, _________________________________________ John R. Bell, Jr. (SC Bar No. 72599) John Bell Law

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Retrieved from http://ir.law.fsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1736&context=lr Jenkins, C. (1974). The Right to counsel and due process in probation revocation proceedings: Gagnon v. Scarpelli (1974). Retrieved from http://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2643&context=clevstlrev Justia US Supreme Court. (2017). Gagnon v. Scarpelli 411 U.S. 778 (1973).…

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Retrieved November 28, 2016, from https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/jay-sterling-silver-fixing-the-conflict-of- interest-at-the-core-of-police-brutality-cases/2014/12/04/0233e6e2-7b1d-11e4-b821- 503cc7efed9e_story.html?utm_term=.878cb2d3ae96 Sizer, R. M., & Saltzman, D. (2009, January). Plan to Address Racial Profiling. Retrieved November 28, 2016, from…

    • 2358 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Negligence Case Study

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Plaintiff shall claim that the actions of defendants’ were intentional which caused harm by personal injury, that resulted in loss of financial stability and career sustainability, which was not insignificant and fell under the scope of defendants’ liability. The ‘but for’ test also establishes that had the defendants acted with care, the plaintiff would have been able to continue normally. Furthermore, the ‘egg- shell skull’ is applicable, which states that the defendant must take the plaintiff as they found them. Defense: A defense of voluntary assumption of risk can be brought by defendants, which is an inherent risk , especially in recreational activates, consenting to injuries. However the League deemed the defendant’s actions unreasonable and they pleaded guilty to the charges, which weakens their…

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They state that media companies were guilty of, “…often imposing ridiculously high fines for minor offenses, such as downloading a few files” (Morrow & Weston 442). The words used to describe the fines and the offenses contradict the overall argument the authors is trying to make. The argument is attempting to show that media downloading is a serious issue and that media companies have a legitimate reason to fight against such an act. Thus, the authors should not lead into this topic with subtle antagonism towards the media companies. To improve this, adjectives that coincide with the overarching conclusion should be used instead.…

    • 772 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rule 404 Case Study

    • 1094 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Masters' rebuttal testimony reporting Storm's statement about the Reds game: Rule 403 – Excluding Relevant, Evidence for Prejudice, Confusing, Waste of Time or Other Reasons. Confusing Issues, misleading the jury, needlessly presenting cumulative evidence. Rule 602 – Need for Personal Knowledge – The first basic element that is required of a witness is personal knowledge is what Masters is testifying about that Storm has conflicting information on where he was on the night of the fire. Use of Prior Statements Rule 608(b)(1) This rule can be applied here because it strongly suggests that Storm's untruthful character because he says he couldn't be in Akron, because in one instance he was in Cleveland and the other he was in Cincinnati. His statement is inconsistent where his truthfulness is largely in question.…

    • 1094 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He has no desire to injure, but knows that this will more than likely hurt Jason. The firework did cause injuries to Jason. Sam is now subject to liability for an intentional tort to Jason. Everyone has a right to file a negligent lawsuit if the claims are valid. One thing to keep in mind though if you are filling a personal injury lawsuit is whether the plaintiff’s chance of winning is worth the cost.…

    • 1473 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Unless, the defendant wishes to waive their rights. In order for a defendant to waive their sixth amendment right they first must go before the judge who presides over the case and be warned of what exactly representing your self means. The judge will advise the defendant of their rights, and explain to the defendant the dangers of representing yourself in the court of law. The judge will also make sure the defendant is literate and mentally competent to stand trial. In most situations, if you waive your right to counsel you essentially help the police and the prosecution engage in tactics that could easily result in a stronger case against…

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Therefore, substantial evidence must be provided to hold the defendant for trial. If in any case there is insufficient evidence, the judge is supposed to dismiss the charges. Preliminary hearings may be in the form of initial appearance where the defendant is informed of the charges against them. The defendant is also advised on the right to be silent since any statement that he may make might be utilized against him in the court. It may also be essential for the defendant to seek for a bail (Montemayor, 2014).…

    • 287 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Furthermore in paragraphs twenty two by using extreme examples of Hitler’s persecution and the freedom fighters, Dr. King uses history in order to depict the fact that sometimes what is legal is unjust and what is illegal is actually just. In that way he reasons with the reader and points out the fallacies in the clergymen’s argument once again. His logos appeal allows him to take a slow approach by gently providing example to convince them of his ideas. Through his logos appeal, he also does build ethos as he shows he is knowledgeable in this cause and justified to speak of the manner, furthermore the cause has directly affected him as he has been included in the segregation, and put in jail due to civil disobedience showing how he can speak on this matter. By using icons from the bible as examples, he also builds pathos as many people are Christians who can relate to icons, and as a result Dr. King is able to appeal to the reader through pathos, ethos, and most prominently logos so show how civil disobedience is…

    • 1079 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    United States. v. Dunn Bench Memorandum The purpose of this bench memorandum is to inform the District Court Judge on the significance of Dunn v. United States in refining 18 U.S.C. § 1623, “False declarations before a court or grand jury”, and 18 U.S.C. § 1621, “Perjury generally”, as well as explaining the fundamental purpose of due process. Specifically, this bench memorandum should serve as a reference for District Court judges on how to draft jury instructions about these laws.…

    • 2153 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays