The first psychological cue that can be manipulated by cults is social proof. The cult existing in-and-of itself provides this proof. Surely no one would join a cult, so clearly all of these people together are here of their own logical accord, right? Wrong. Humans are social by nature and are, therefore, more likely to implicitly trust or believe in other established cohorts. Additionally, “[westerners] have a desire to both feel and be perceived to act consistently. Once we have made an initial commitment, it is more likely that we will agree to subsequent commitments that follow from the first (Levine, 2018).” When presented with groups that outwardly demonstrate the values we declare belief in, we may even be eager to align ourselves with them to bring our feelings and actions into congruence. The final, and possibly most manipulative, strategy employed by cults is the circumvention of natural reactance. As Levine explains, “[the] most effective way to circumvent psychological reactance is to first get a foot in the door and then escalate the demands so gradually that there is seemingly nothing to react against.” In this way an individual enters into the cult unawares, as so many psychological processes were skirted, thus allowing further psychological processes to be implemented to strengthen their …show more content…
When cohesiveness intensifies, members become more likely to accept the goals, decisions, and norms of the group without reservation. Conformity pressures also rise as members become reluctant to say or do anything that goes against the grain of the group, and the number of internal disagreements—necessary for good decision making—decreases (2018).” Cult members are often isolated from what is considered the outside world so that they do not question or rebuke the cult’s authority and do not attempt to realign their thinking with the larger populations. Once in this position, the group is likely to engage in discussion that praises whatever their agenda and further decreases an individual’s likelihood of questioning practices or