Stratford Magistrate Court Observation Examples

Improved Essays
Magistrate courts are lower courts in the hierarchy of courts in England and Wales where all criminal proceedings starts. Some civil matters such as family proceedings are also dealt with by the Magistrates court. While the Magistrate court has limited sentencing powers, more serious crimes such as rape and murder cases are passed on to the Crown court which has more sentencing powers and wide range of punishments. Appeals on cases decided by the crown courts usually go to a high court, court of appeal or the Supreme Court. Cases in the magistrate courts are usually heard by a district Judge or by a bench of magistrates known has lay judges. No jury is present at a magistrate court.
This essay focuses on a subjective court observation that took place at Stratford Magistrate court on the 17th of December 2014. I arrived at Stratford Magistrate court around 1:30 pm – introduced myself to the security and informed him of my objective to observe a hearing for my assessment. He was very helpful as I checked in through the metal detector and he informed me that the court was on break and the proceedings will
…show more content…
It then became apparent that it was a case of common assault– the defendant’s lawyer cross examines the witness shortly after, her first question was to establish the witness’ relationship with the defendant and how they got along as neighbours. It emerged that they did not really come in contact with each other as witness lived 9 floors from the ground. Defendant’s lawyer further asked how she was able to see the whole altercation with such clarity from 9 floors above the ground. Victim claimed to have a balcony with a bird’s eye view of the surrounding area around her flat – defendant’s lawyer then asked the victim if she called the police to report what she had witnessed but the witness responded to the question by claiming to have called another neighbour

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    VICTORIAN CIVIL AND ADMINISTRATION TRIBUNAL (VCAT) The Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal (VCAT)is organized under the Victoria Civil And Administrative Tribunal Act 1998 and it started functioning on the date of 1st July 1998.VCAT has 15 boards and tribunals to offer and conducts hearings in some areas in Victoria specifically in suburban and regional. Its location was in 55 King street,Melbourne. VCAT vision is to render service to Victorians people in a fair,low cost and efficient way to help resolved disputes. Providing a low cost,accessible,efficient and independent tribunal who deliver a high quality resolution is the purpose of VCAT.Through the years,It has progress to take in new jurisdictions and functions under various acts,rules…

    • 1102 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Democratic societies like Canada and the United States follow the unwritten and underlying principle of “rule of law”. The rule of law ensure that a certain level of procedural justice are achieved in trials, as they provide the court with a basic grid of evaluation. However, such procedural processes were not respected in the Bryant-Milam trial, as the the two social categories of race and social class tarnished the processes of the trial, fostering impartial judicial proceedings and ultimately disallowing justice. The trials ability in achieving justice was deterred as occupational status and race contaminated and fostered impartiality amongst the jury, the witnesses and the provided evidence; three of the fundamental components of a judicial proceedings.…

    • 777 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Magistrate court has one hundred and fifty nine courts with one hundred and fifty nine Chief Magistrates and three hundred and thirty three Magistrates. The Magistrate Court handles civil claims…

    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They work with minor civil cases and criminal offences where the maximum sum of compensation is less than $10,000. Courts can issue same types of warrants as Municipal Courts and serve as the coroner, if there is no other medical examiner. Small Claims Courts give only monetary compensations – they can not make person to start or stop doing something. Cases from both types of institutions are appealed by State Intermediate Appellate Courts that have intermediate appellate jurisdiction. Defendants have rights to appeal their convictions, if they have records of the trial and the motion for a new trial was made before the 10th day after judgment.…

    • 305 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    R V Campbell (2010) NSWSC 995 Desmond Campbell was found guilty of pushing his wife, Janet Campbell, of six months off a cliff top in the Royal National Park. Desmond pushed Janet from the top of a sheer 50m cliff south of Burning Palms, resulting in her death as she had hit her head on a rick platform below, in March 2005. Elements Of The Offence Before a criminal act can be brought to trial, the police and prosecutors need to prove the elements of a particular offence are present. The elements are; actus reus, mens rea and causation.…

    • 1475 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Bobby Phoenix, an expert on batter woman syndrome, Sidney Miller, M.D, Physician at New Columbia Hospital Center, as well as the defendant, Dominique Stephens herself. On the side of the prosecution we have Detective Dana Hughes, from the Metropolitan Police Department, and Jordan Bright, Dominque Stephen’s sibling. The evidence presented at trial are the Metropolitan Police Department Statement, New Columbia Hospital Records, and a picture of the pistol used to kill Donovan Stephens. I decided to accept witness, Dr. Bobby Phoenix, as a professional on battered women syndrome. I’m basing his expertise on the fact that he is the Executive Director of the National Center for Women’s studies, he has a Ph.D. in Psychology from Georgetown University where he also teaches about domestic violence, and he is very knowledgeable on the subject.…

    • 2831 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout history, there has been countless ways in which a judge has conducted themselves within a courtroom. Throughout this interval of recreation, there has been only a handful that have ultimately transformed the world we live in today. One of those is known as the Warren Court Era of 1953-1969. Within the courtroom, the Warren Court era has represented a time of trial, struggle, and change, crossing the lines that were once put in front of us to follow. This was a time when judicial philosophy re-defined the way in which we viewed the judicial system as well as a copious outbreak of judicial activism.…

    • 145 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jury Court Cases

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages

    On November 22, 2016, I sat in courtroom 507 of the Fresno County Superior Court, under the Honorable Judge Timothy Kams. Judge Kams was conducting a jury selection for a jury trial dealing with a felony DUI case. During the jury selection, I witnessed a Venire. A venire or jury pool, is a master list or jury list, from which a petit panel is selected, typically is based on names drawn from voter registration lists or lists of licensed drivers over eighteen years of age (Lippmann, 2014, p.518). I also witnessed a Voir Dire.…

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Balancing the tension between community interest and individual rights and freedoms are a significant component of the criminal trial process and is relatively successful in that retrospect. In order to be effective and efficient the criminal trial process should reflect the moral and ethical standards of society, ensure the community is sufficiently protected and respects the rights of the individual. However, despite efforts to achieve justice for all members of society, the criminal trial process does fail to provide adequate success in some areas of the law such as the jury system, Legal Aid and the provocation defence. All these areas to an extent highlight the lack of success the criminal trial process serves in balancing community interests…

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I went to Kings County Supreme Court. Its located at 360 Adams Street, Brooklyn NY at September 21 at 2:30 pm to 4:40 pm under Honor Francois A. Rivera from Part 52. The case type was civil and type of the proceedings is a trial. There were 8 jurors in the stand. Mostly male and about 2 females juror.…

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    On the 8th of November I visited Oxford crown court; whilst I had previously attended various levels of courts to witness trials, I had never watched a sentencing. Therefore, intrigued to see the process, I decided to watch the sentencing of Tom Mobey. Immediately upon entering the courtroom I noticed a very different atmosphere to trial, one that was much more private and personal. There was a limited number of people in court: just the two opposing counsel, a clerk, the defendant and his accompanying custody officer. In addition, the defendant was not retained in the dock behind glass, but rather sat in front of it.…

    • 1079 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Superior Court Case Study

    • 917 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Observations: The whole trial process of this case was about 10 minutes. During this process, I could see that the defendant, Lee Mason Eigl was nervous. Most of the time, Lee Mason Eigl faced down. When the judge was not asking him questions, he would not look at the judge.…

    • 917 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dworkin on Judicial Discretion in “Hard Cases” Lu Zhao Boyu (Bozy) | A0127866R In the standard courtroom, one could reasonably expect the judge to be the one responsible for the holding of a case. However, does and should the judge exercise his own discretion when deciding cases? Prominent legal theorist H. L. A. Hart claims that judges do exercise discretion, especially in “hard cases”, where there is no pre-existing or unambiguous rule. To this matter, Hart’s brilliant student Ronald Dworkin offers an alternative theory, which argues that judges do not have discretion and should follow principles instead of rules, even in “hard cases”.…

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Hanging Judge Analysis

    • 1388 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Philosopher, Jiddu Krishnamurti once said, “The ability to observe without evaluating is the highest form of intelligence.” (Vajda, 2009). However, every person on this planet is guilty of passing judgement on other individuals. Whether the evaluation be made in a local grocery store or in as contentious an environment as a United States courtroom, humans are all guilty of judging individuals by their perceived covers. In an ideal world, legal punishments would reflect officials’ objectivity toward permissible evidence, however, empirical research has revealed additional arbitrary factors.…

    • 1388 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Trial Summery Over the summer and fall of 2015 I Interned at the public defender’s office in Wake County. Throughout my time interning I have been working on two cases, neither of which have gone to trial neither of which have gone to trial at this stage. However, I was able to attend part of a trial for a rape case, in which our client was the defendant. By attending part of this case, I was able to experience first-hand courtroom procedures.…

    • 1087 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays