Victorian Civil And Administrative Tribunal Analysis

Great Essays
VICTORIAN CIVIL AND ADMINISTRATION TRIBUNAL (VCAT)
The Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal (VCAT)is organized under the Victoria Civil And Administrative Tribunal Act 1998 and it started functioning on the date of 1st July 1998.VCAT has 15 boards and tribunals to offer and conducts hearings in some areas in Victoria specifically in suburban and regional.Its location was in 55 King street,Melbourne.VCAT vision is to render service to Victorians people in a fair,low cost and efficient way to help resolved disputes.Providing a low cost,accessible,efficient and independent tribunal who deliver a high quality resolution is the purpose of VCAT.Through the years,It has progress to take in new jurisdictions and functions under various acts,rules
…show more content…
When I entered the hearing room,I observed the large room was maintained and organised.The chairs arranged properly with the personnel to seat.The level of chairs or the position of the personnel chairs was higher with the level where we seat as the audience or observer.When the tribunal member arrives we all stand up to give respect while waiting his signal to sit down.There are four personnels in the hearing room composed of one judge,one court reporter,one tenant and one representative.The Judge who seated in front center of the room while the one representative seated at the left side and one tenant the applicant who brought this case at the tribunal is seated at the right side.Before the hearing starts,both applicants and respondents will take an oath by putting their hand on the bible while saying the oath.(HYPERLINK http://www.vcat.vic.gov.au/about- vcat

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    There were not a lot of people in attendance, so the projector screen did not cause a huge seating problem, but it did block the view that I had of the jury. The jury’s attire that I could see surprised me. If I was called in for jury duty, I feel like I would dress in semi-formal attire. The jury that I saw was dressed in sweats and sweatshirts. In addition, I wish that I had been able to see the documents that court was referring to.…

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    . The court ruled that the warrantless search of the dormitory room by the campus police violated the defendant's constitutional rights and that all evidence obtained as a result of the search should be suppressed in the case Commonwealth v. Eric W. Neilson, 423 Mass 75 (1996). College officials searched the room because they had reason to believe that there was an animal inside the room, which is against school policies. When they got in the room they proceeded to look in the closet; there they found a marijuana plant. The college officials immediately called the police and when they arrived they took pictures of the plant for evidence, and then with the help of the college officials, removed it from the room.…

    • 199 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Question 2: In Commonwealth v. Aves and Sim’s case 7 Cushy, chief justice Shaw came to two entirely different verdicts, which lead to massive controversy and questioning about his inconsistency on slavery issues. In Commonwealth v. Aves, Chief Justice Shaw made the decision to grant a 6-year-old girl named Med freedom after her “owner” voluntarily brought her into a free state (where slavery was abolished). A key term within this statement is that she was voluntarily brought into the free state; she did not escape from her masters. At this time, slaves were considered property of their owners, which technically means that comity, should be exercised.…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Select a crime and then find a suitable case that interests you. Newspapers are a great place to start researching for a case - Mohammed Haddara faced Melbourne Magistrates’ Court in the committal hearing (a hearing in the local court before the charge is heard in the district court or Supreme Court) over drug possession and vehicle thefts . Identify the court the case would be heard in. Outline the jurisdiction of this court – criminal, civil, original and appellate – This court has been heard in the Melbourne Magistrates court as a committal hearing. The Magistrates court of Victoria is the lowest court in the Victorian system and is a court of summary jurisdiction .…

    • 1154 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    ‘Mabo V Queensland’ is an Australian prominent landmark case which began in 1982 in the High Court of Australia and ended in 1992. This case is commonly referred to as just ‘Mabo’. This case was taken to the High Court as a test case to establish Aboriginal’s land rights including their ownership of land. A test case is a case that establishes new legal rights or principles. In this case, the concept of terra nullius was also challenged.…

    • 1197 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Adjudications Case Study

    • 873 Words
    • 4 Pages

    M1: Justify the use of adjudications and incentive schemes in relation to addressing offending behavior and the maintenance of control. M2: Analyze how developing positive relationships and addressing offending behavior benefits the individual and society. A prison’s sole purpose is for retribution, incapacitation, deterrence and rehabilitation. When an individual commits of crime/offence against the laws put in place by society and is charged for their crime; the prison system is used to protect society and punish those through taking away privileges and freedom.…

    • 873 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Reign Of Terror DBQ

    • 811 Words
    • 4 Pages

    (Document F) But the question is how did they know to suspect an individual without proof and evidence? The tribunal was established to try all crimes against the state and no one was safe from suspicion. A careless word of criticism spoken against the government could put one in prison or worse. (Document E)…

    • 811 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Drug Smuggling Case Study

    • 1247 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Drug smuggling is an offence when an individual transports drugs from one country to another. A man named Olaf Dietrich smuggled at least 70 grams of Heroin packed in condoms which he had swallowed. On the 17th of December 1986, Dietrich flew into Melbourne airport from Thailand and got arrested by the Australian federal police the next morning, when the police found one of the condoms in the kitchen, and some heroin in a plastic bag under a rug in another room. Dietrich went to the high court arguing that his rights have been infringed when being trialled for the drug related offences. The right to have a fair trial was infringed by the county court due to Dietrich not having any legal representation, or any legal aid while he was trialled…

    • 1247 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Australian Legal System

    • 1683 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The Australian legal system arrayed during the First Fleet, in which the British Parliament passed legislation and Letter Patents to create the criminal and civil courts when colonies were set up in Australia.4 Furthermore, it also granted the colonies to set up its own local system of government, called the ‘responsible government’, in which it allowed the colonies to create its own…

    • 1683 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    R V Campbell (2010) NSWSC 995 Desmond Campbell was found guilty of pushing his wife, Janet Campbell, of six months off a cliff top in the Royal National Park. Desmond pushed Janet from the top of a sheer 50m cliff south of Burning Palms, resulting in her death as she had hit her head on a rick platform below, in March 2005. Elements Of The Offence Before a criminal act can be brought to trial, the police and prosecutors need to prove the elements of a particular offence are present. The elements are; actus reus, mens rea and causation.…

    • 1475 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Magistrate courts are lower courts in the hierarchy of courts in England and Wales where all criminal proceedings starts. Some civil matters such as family proceedings are also dealt with by the Magistrates court. While the Magistrate court has limited sentencing powers, more serious crimes such as rape and murder cases are passed on to the Crown court which has more sentencing powers and wide range of punishments. Appeals on cases decided by the crown courts usually go to a high court, court of appeal or the Supreme Court. Cases in the magistrate courts are usually heard by a district Judge or by a bench of magistrates known has lay judges.…

    • 1325 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In a criminal trial, a jury is a group usually comprised of twelve randomly chosen adults, whose role is to hear evidence, apply the law as directed by the judge, and then collectively decide if the defendant is guilty or not guilty of the crime they have been accused of, based only on the facts given. Juries have played a significant role in Australia’s justice system for quite some time, though in more recent years the role of juries has been reduced. In 2011, the NSW government changed the law so that accused persons could apply for judge alone trials and, with consent from the Director of Public, avoid juries entirely (Whitbourn 2013). Currently there is much debate as to whether or not the jury system should be scrapped entirely for criminal trials in NSW.…

    • 1003 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The purpose of this paper is to answer the case study questions and discuss the legal and ethical issues found in the case study Nepa vs. Commonwealth Department of Public Welfare. The case reveals elderly abuse by residents who endured abuse and neglect at the hands of the person charged with caring for them. It reviews the court’s findings of the petitioner’s appeal of the court’s judgment to revoke his license. This case study exemplifies types of patient and elderly abuse and patient rights violations which victims are often reluctant to report. “Patient abuse refers to the mistreatment or neglect of individuals in the health care setting” (Pozgar,2016, p. 418).…

    • 1301 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Contracts are an integral part of society, having strong legal contractual principles gives confidence to consumers, investors and anyone who wishes to enter into a contract. Entering in a contract shows that in a primitive way that two parties are on the same page, however it is noted that a high proportion of litigation does actually stem from misunderstood contract (Duxbury (2011)).In this scenario Gary believes he has a valid contract with Mike and is disappointed to learn that Mike has sold on the Bike to Liz (third party). Using previous cases as precedent and analysing the conditions in which a contract is made, advice will be given to Gary on his legal position in regards to the contract and whether there is any suitable remedy that…

    • 1534 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Lifeboat Dilemma There were several issues involving ethics in The Queen v. Dudley and Stephens case. The case facts are subject to a major ethical issue involving whether it is ethical to kill a man to save three. Some would argue that when given a situation where at least one person will die, we should try to save as many human lives as possible. Others should state that the value of human life is immeasurable. Who are we to decide if one life is equal to another?…

    • 736 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays