Obama Executive Power

Decent Essays
The framers of U.S. Constitution expressed the use of the ‘executive power’ allotted to the President of the United States under article II, Section I. The framers deliberately implied that the ‘executive power’ should be used solely for the purpose of upholding the Presidential duties of the President. The duties vested to the president is to ensure that the laws of the United States are faithfully executed and are abided by. On November 20, 2014, President Obama publicized a series of executive actions pertaining to illegal immigration involving the Mexican border. The primary outline of their executive orders contains the following: expanding the DACA, allowing alien parents and lawful permanent residents of the U.S. to request deferral action and employment authorization for three years, to expand usage of provisional waivers of illegal presence, and finally modernizing and improving immigration visa programs (USCIS). …show more content…
That link is the Executive orders expressed in detail uploaded by the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration services of the United States. There is not point one in the document that expressed that President Obama used his ‘executive power’ to up hold the law. President Obama used his ‘executive power’ as the executor of the United States for his own personal political beliefs and desires. Sadly, this is not the first time a President used his power for personal desires. In 1965 Lyndon B. Johnson used his executive power to force public corporations and businesses that accept federal grants and or funding to employee a certain amount minorities dictated by the U.S. Government. Again, Johnson used his executive power to for change for this personal beliefs. Is President Obama in the wrong and/or did he partake in the misuse of the executive power of the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    By definition, Executive Orders (EOs) are “legally binding orders given by the President, acting as the head of the Executive Branch, to Federal Administrative Agencies” (Fox ThisNation). Executive Orders are typically used to direct federal agencies and officials in their execution of congressionally established laws or policies. In many instances, however, they have been used to guide agencies in directions contrary to congressional intent (Fox, ThisNation). The Constitution of the United States denotes that the executive power shall be vested in a President. In addition, the power shall be vested in the legislative power in a Congress, and the judicial power in a Judiciary.…

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    He has made over 200 of these types of laws, but this to be considering nothing new. President Obama has gone around congress, to make laws and should have to make laws that have to go through congress. I still…

    • 211 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Congress itself has given the president powers that it does not constitutionally have, and the constitution is vague in some areas so the president takes advantage of the opportunity. For example, when he deploys troops to war without congressional approval because the constitution says he is the commander in chief. The role of the president has changed from weak to a strong one because he has more powers than the founding fathers intended. Institutional, cultural, and policy changes have altered the role of the Presidency because they caused the president’s power to strengthen and ultimately giving the impression that the president is the most…

    • 1047 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Democrat Huey Long, an outspoken American politician regarded as the “best populist”1 who denounced the wealth inequality among the rich and the poor, has seen his fair share of triumphs and victories throughout his term as Louisiana 's Governor and U.S. Senator. Under his leadership, he helped the “distressed” by supporting beneficial programs, such as providing free school textbooks to children, all at such a high price. With spurring controversy concerning the way he ran his own “political machine,”1 much debate has risen as to whether his own personal ambitions to consolidate all political power in his hands was blinding him from the intended purpose in serving in government. America’s experience with the “defender of the friendless”1 has justified how the initial Framers were able to concentrate power among a system of separated institutions and not just within the hands of potential “populist demagogues.” No framer offered such unique insight into the writing of the Constitution…

    • 1574 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Two Presidencies Theory

    • 876 Words
    • 4 Pages

    While the president is able to pass executive orders to change policy, these orders may be defunded by congress, counteracted by congressional legislation, or deemed unconstitutional by the Supreme Court. In addition, although a president is able to veto legislation, if a president continually vetoes legislation, the public may not look on him/her favorably, which would impact their electability. These factors seem to limit the president’s power greatly; however, so long as the president’s executive order is not unconstitutional, the president still wields remarkable power, as Congress would need a majority opposition in order to defund the president’s executive order. Furthermore, many of the president’s constituents could be swayed if the president were to deliver a speech concerning the necessity of his executive order. The executive branch, being the largest branch in government, requires that the president divides his power among the vice president, department heads, and heads of independent agencies in order to accomplish all of the administration’s tasks.…

    • 876 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Founding Fathers created the Constitution with one goal: to limit both the federal government’s power and the President’s power. The Federalists fought vigorously for more Presidential power, while the Anti-Federalists adamantly fought against it. Despite the bitter, long, neverending debate, both parties untimely compromised and created what is known as the modern day United States Constitution. Within the Constitution, the Presidential powers are outlined. In Article II, Section 2 of the US Constitution, the specific powers are outlined.…

    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Executive Privilege is a controversial presidential power that is recognized by the courts but is nowhere mentioned in the U.S. Constitution. Executive Privilege is often used by presidents to hide information that may be incriminating or detrimental to their party or political standing. Many historians and politicians have claimed that executive privilege is not real and question whether it is constitutional for presidents and other members of the executive branch to withhold documents and testimony from congress. As defined in the dictionary, Executive Privilege is the principle that members of the executive branch of government cannot legally be forced to disclose their confidential communications when such disclosure would adversely affect the operations or procedures of the executive branch.…

    • 1342 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    George Washington establishment of Executive Privilege From the beginning in 1795, the Executive Privilege Doctrine was established by our first president George Washington. The Doctrine of Executive Privilege is to protect the Executive Branch’s confidentiality interest. “Executive Privilege in the context of the secrecy syndrome of the government” (Reylea, 1981, p. 31). The Doctrine of Executive Privilege has expanded over the years. J.A. Carroll and M.W. Ashworth stated that the hopes of the Executive Privilege was “to take a transient view of the situation of private concerns” (Carroll & Ashworth, 1957, p. 243).…

    • 2431 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On June 15, 2012, then Secretary of Homeland Security, Janet Napolitano, announced the implementation of Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA). Announced via memorandum, this policy would allow undocumented people no older than age thirty to gain prosecutorial discretion and avoid removal proceedings. Applicants can also apply for employment authorization, which would grant a temporary work permit as well as a Social Security Number. This, of course, hinged on several crucial factors including physical presence in the United States, having come to the United States under age 16, and a clean criminal record (“Deferred Action Overview, 2015). The program, like many programs under United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS),…

    • 1527 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    President of the United States(POTUS) - Chief of State, Chief Executive, Chief Diplomat, Commander-In-Chief, Chief Legislator, Chief of Party, Chief Guardian of the Economy. It seems the person who holds this position is the most powerful person in the world. But, as the pioneers of modern democracy, has the United States’ stripped the position of it’s power in it’s attempt to realize a perfect system of checks and balances? Or has the spike in executive duties given the President far too broad a purview? In a constantly evolving society, the role of the government and of the President are constantly changing causing sharp conflict between those who believe the President holds too little or too much power.…

    • 784 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    According to an article on the Cornell University Law School, The Second Amendment of the United States Constitution reads: "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed". This is one of the Constitutional rights that was given to us by our founding fathers. To impose executive orders and bypass congress is illegal and simply unconstitutional. So now that…

    • 1431 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The power of the Executive Branch is limited through judicial review, which is a process where legislative action must be reviewed by the judicial branch to make sure it conforms with the constitution. Therefore, the president isn’t able to freely make decisions that could hurt the…

    • 1445 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Presidential Power Dbq

    • 1175 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Many historians believe that the power of the President has decreased over time. This assumption usually results from the President’s inability to line item veto, or rejecting individual provisions of a bill. However, after much reevaluation, many other historians argue that the power of the president has increased over time because of his unique powers that he does not share with Congress. A key role model during this increase of power is Andrew Jackson, symbolizing the expandment of presidential authority due to his significant enlargement of the use of vetoes. Mandates, or official orders from the President to do something, also symbolize an independent expansion of presidential power.…

    • 1175 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The President of the United States has many powers, those given to him/her in The Constitution, and the powers that are deemed constitutional by the judicial branch. The judicial branch is in charge of interpreting the laws and The Constitution. In American history, two ways have been implemented in the interpretation process. One such practice is the Restricted or Whig approach; this approach employs the idea that the President can only do things explicitly expressed in the Constitution. This practice was used until Theodore Roosevelt came into office, and after his presidency The Stewardship Theory began to rise.…

    • 727 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    These are the many questions that people are asking in the 21st century because our country has changed drastically in many ways. So, what it comes down to is what would be better for the United States? Many people will argue that the Constitution should not be altered, because it is the original foundation of the United States. Although, I have varied feelings about this subject I believe that some sections of the Constitution should be modernized. Such as Article One, Section Four of the Constitution states, “The Congress…

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays