The Influence Of Presidential Powers In The United States

Improved Essays
The Founding Fathers created the Constitution with one goal: to limit both the federal government’s power and the President’s power. The Federalists fought vigorously for more Presidential power, while the Anti-Federalists adamantly fought against it. Despite the bitter, long, neverending debate, both parties untimely compromised and created what is known as the modern day United States Constitution. Within the Constitution, the Presidential powers are outlined. In Article II, Section 2 of the US Constitution, the specific powers are outlined. They include things such as “the President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States,” but no where is it outlined that the President has the power to declare war. Nevertheless,

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Issues surrounding presidential constitutional authority as commander in chief implicate many of the most contested issues in constitutional law. Article I of the Constitution gives some war powers to the Congress — namely, the power to declare war — while Article II gives the president the power of Commander-in-Chief. After our tragic misadventure in Indochina, it was the general consensus that what happened was purely a result of presidential usurpation of the power of Congress to “declare War”. It was concluded that a necessary, legislative remedy to guard against future encroachment as well as protect the American people from presidential adventurism was needed. This legislation came in the form of the 1973 War Powers Resolution.…

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Some would say that that the framers of the Constitution limited the power of the President enough by giving some powers to congress, but the more valid perspective is that the framers of the Constitution did not limit the President’s powers enough because some powers of Congress have changed to be the President’s powers. In the constitution, the President has many powers such as being Commander in chief of the army, appointing ambassadors and supreme court justices, and making sure laws are faithfully executed. The President has all of these powers, but more recently, the President has taken over some powers that Congress is supposed to have. The framers of the Constitution gave the President too many powers.…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Commander-in-ChiefThe President is the final authority in military matters and ultimately is responsible for the entire military might of the United State. Foreign AffairsThe President has the right to conduct diplomatic missions and set foreign policy on behalf of the United States.- Executive Clemency. The President has the power to pardon or commute the sentence of convicted criminals. Emergency Power. The President has the ability to declare a 90 day period of Emergency during which he can use the full force of the military without seeking permission from Congress either in the form of a declaration of war or through funding, Veto.…

    • 5175 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Over the past couple of weeks President Jane Dove of the United States has faced a potential Secession from the South Western States of the United States, these States are: California, Arizona, New Mexico, Texas, Colorado and Nevada. These States called themselves Nuevo Aztlan under Dr. Fonseca leadership, who master minded the secession plot in 2032 against the United States of America. It is obvious that this was a test to the first female president of the United States war-making and emergency powers under the United States constitution without consulting congress first, who have the explicit powers to declare war. More importantly, being a Legal counsel for President Jane Dove, it is imperative to objectively review her actions during…

    • 822 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Separation of Powers is the most important value in the Constitution guard against tyranny. In document B James Madison states “Liberty requires that the three great departments of power should be separate and distinct”. This show that each branch shall have its own distinct powers and not be totally connected. The constitution of the United State states “All Legislative powers herein granted shall be vested in Congress of the U.S. (Senate and House of Representatives)... The executive power shall be vested in a President of the U.S……

    • 563 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It can be argued that the president is not in charge of creating legislation, and that the president is to play a role in foreign relations, and that by giving him, the president, the power of the military, that in itself is an argument made by those that support ratification. However, the power to declare war rests in congress and not the president, in which the president is only in charge of the military when war has been declared. The imbalance of power between the three branches of government is a problem that the constitution creates, but that is not the only problem. The other problem that the constitution creates is that the federal government does not provide specific liberties within itself in which the federal government will protect. Those…

    • 915 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The framers of the Constitution designed the office of president to be a rather weak one. Given the original government presented in the Articles of Confederation, an example was followed while writing the Constitution. Congress was given more power and influence over the nation, and dominated the executive branch until the 1930s. The president, while being granted some powers,…

    • 966 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The framers of the constitution wanted to have a president with limited power because they wanted to prevent another tyranny. As stated in Federalist #46, “The accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive, and judiciary, in the same hands…may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny.” The framers created a government with checks and balances which caused the separation of power composed of the three branches: Legislative (congress), Executive (president), and Judicial (supreme court). They didn’t want a single branch to become too powerful, so they gave each branch specific checks that they could use on the other two branches to keep them in line. Although the president was intended to be weak on paper, actually to the American…

    • 1047 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the year 1787, there were two major different political parties that were involved in the ratification of the American Constitution. The Federalist and the Anti-Federalist; they both had very strong views regarding the welfare of the country and its citizens. The Federalist who wanted to impose a stronger government had the greatest ideas and impact on the ratification of the American’s Constitution. They didn’t want the idea of having any loose interpretation of anything, they wanted everything to be clear and done by the book, they were afraid that if anything was left up to interpretation, America would face many challenges, and would never be a whole as it is right now, and surely would lose its freedom.…

    • 1772 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Executive Privilege is a controversial presidential power that is recognized by the courts but is nowhere mentioned in the U.S. Constitution. Executive Privilege is often used by presidents to hide information that may be incriminating or detrimental to their party or political standing. Many historians and politicians have claimed that executive privilege is not real and question whether it is constitutional for presidents and other members of the executive branch to withhold documents and testimony from congress. As defined in the dictionary, Executive Privilege is the principle that members of the executive branch of government cannot legally be forced to disclose their confidential communications when such disclosure would adversely affect the operations or procedures of the executive branch.…

    • 1342 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    President of the United States(POTUS) - Chief of State, Chief Executive, Chief Diplomat, Commander-In-Chief, Chief Legislator, Chief of Party, Chief Guardian of the Economy. It seems the person who holds this position is the most powerful person in the world. But, as the pioneers of modern democracy, has the United States’ stripped the position of it’s power in it’s attempt to realize a perfect system of checks and balances? Or has the spike in executive duties given the President far too broad a purview? In a constantly evolving society, the role of the government and of the President are constantly changing causing sharp conflict between those who believe the President holds too little or too much power.…

    • 784 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Well before the 20th century, Congress was in charge of the federal government. Only a handful of times did the president actually make decisions or have involvement in the process. Earlier, in the formation of the United States, the president was easily considered “chief clerk”. The increased importance of foreign policy, helped to develop the presidential powers of the 20th century. Since then, the president of the United States of America has grown to become the most powerful position our nation.…

    • 1197 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In his article, “The Perils of Presidentialism” Juan Linz observe that there are few stable democracies that have presidential systems of government. On the contrary, there are many parliamentary democracies and historically, they have performed better. Three major problems of presidential systems can be deduced from his essay; 1) Dual legitimacy, 2) fixed term, and 3) winner-takes-all logic. After explaining all three problems, this paper argues that winner-takes-all logic is as much applicable to parliamentary systems as it is to presidential systems.…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Presidential Power Dbq

    • 1175 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Many historians believe that the power of the President has decreased over time. This assumption usually results from the President’s inability to line item veto, or rejecting individual provisions of a bill. However, after much reevaluation, many other historians argue that the power of the president has increased over time because of his unique powers that he does not share with Congress. A key role model during this increase of power is Andrew Jackson, symbolizing the expandment of presidential authority due to his significant enlargement of the use of vetoes. Mandates, or official orders from the President to do something, also symbolize an independent expansion of presidential power.…

    • 1175 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The president is a dominant force in forging policy making, because the framers when they were constructing the constitution gave the president under Acritical II Of the United States Constitution, the power to be Commander and Chief of the United States arms forces as well as chief diplomat. As Chief diplomat and the figure head of the nation the citizens expect the president to create laws and regulate laws in the greater beneficial of America foreign or domestic. But as important as the president is in policy making. It has to share its power with the United States Congress. They have a symbiotic relationship in where both departments of Executive and Legislative branches have to work together in-order to create policies domestically and…

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays