Pros And Cons Of Executive Orders

Improved Essays
Executive Orders

There has been much controversy over the topic of Executive Orders. On the one hand, there are officials who support the President’s power to issue Executive Orders. On the other hand, however, there are those who are against it. To determine if Executive Orders serve a significant purpose, we must delve inside the world of politics and analyze the positive and negative consequences – the pros and the cons. But first, it would be most important to define the term and learn of its use and perceived importance.

By definition, Executive Orders (EOs) are “legally binding orders given by the President, acting as the head of the Executive Branch, to Federal Administrative Agencies” (Fox ThisNation). Executive Orders are typically used to direct federal agencies and officials in their execution of congressionally established laws or policies. In many instances, however, they have been used to guide agencies in directions contrary to congressional intent (Fox, ThisNation). The Constitution of the United States denotes that the executive power shall be vested in a President. In addition, the power shall be vested in the legislative power in a Congress, and the judicial power in a Judiciary.
…show more content…
However, in comparing the past usage of issues to those of President Obama’s, he is actually pretty closely related to Bush Jr. While he has only been in office a short while, some say that Obama is abusing his power of issuance. However, in comparison with past presidents, his numbers aren’t exactly

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Analysis Of US V. Curtiss

    • 1163 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Many people tend to wonder the actual power of the president. Is it just a title? Or is he secretly the most powerful man; much like a dictator? Well, by going back in time to specific court cases that could have swayed either way, one can easily tell that the president has more powers than everyone thinks. Many think that issues involving wars and foreign relations are solely powers given to the President, but these powers can be tested when problems occur that are not clearly stated in his job description.…

    • 1163 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The order protects privacy and provides public safety for the federal government, businesses and the general public. This Executive Order was established in order to create a commission of not more than 12 members appointed by the President. Members elected to the commission are to include members with extensive backgrounds in cybersecurity, information technology, identity management, internet governance and standards, and privacy.…

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Issues surrounding presidential constitutional authority as commander in chief implicate many of the most contested issues in constitutional law. Article I of the Constitution gives some war powers to the Congress — namely, the power to declare war — while Article II gives the president the power of Commander-in-Chief. After our tragic misadventure in Indochina, it was the general consensus that what happened was purely a result of presidential usurpation of the power of Congress to “declare War”. It was concluded that a necessary, legislative remedy to guard against future encroachment as well as protect the American people from presidential adventurism was needed. This legislation came in the form of the 1973 War Powers Resolution.…

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Commander-in-ChiefThe President is the final authority in military matters and ultimately is responsible for the entire military might of the United State. Foreign AffairsThe President has the right to conduct diplomatic missions and set foreign policy on behalf of the United States.- Executive Clemency. The President has the power to pardon or commute the sentence of convicted criminals. Emergency Power. The President has the ability to declare a 90 day period of Emergency during which he can use the full force of the military without seeking permission from Congress either in the form of a declaration of war or through funding, Veto.…

    • 5175 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The powers of the executive branch are spelled out very loosely in Article II of the Constitution. The power of executive privilege is not expressly given anywhere. It is a power that has been derived from Constitutional foundations such as the idea of separation of powers among the three branches, but the scope of this power is very unclear. Prosecutors argued that the Founding Father's did not want a president who was above the law, while the President argued that executive privilege was necessary in order to have a functioning executive branch, and thus a functioning…

    • 639 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Two Constitutions: U.S. Constitution VS Texas Constitution In many ways, the United States Constitution and Texas Constitutions are similar. Both have a preamble and a Bill of Rights to protect civil liberties. They were written to form a new government with three branches, Executive, Legislative and Judicial. And both gave each branch the ability to check the powers of the other branches to prevent abuse of power.…

    • 876 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The executive Power shall be vested in a President… The judicial Power of the United States shall be…

    • 960 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Executive privilege is a right held by the executive branch that allows the president to withhold information and while the Constitution does not grant this power to the executive explicitly, presidents have justified executive privilege using the Constitution’s separation of powers doctrine and the role of the executive branch in foreign affairs (O’Brien). The sole organ theory also asserts that the president alone acts as a representative on behalf of the country when dealing with foreign nations and in issues of international conflict (O’Brien). With regards to the treaty with Great Britain, Washington has the ability to invoke executive privilege in this case based on implied and explicit powers in the Constitution, the separation of powers doctrine, and precedent set by the Supreme Court. Certain powers are implicit…

    • 1548 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Patriot Act The department of Justice (DOJ) has many different jobs to fulfill in regards to keeping our nation safe. But, the DOJ has one main priority, and that is to prevent future terrorist acts within the United States (US) , and when warranted outside of the US. In a post-9/11 world, meaning after the attacks on the US on September 11th, 2001, the Patriot Act, has played a key role in assisting the DOJ in preventing future acts of terrorism. The writer will examine the pros and cons of the Patriot Act, and overall the ethics behind establishing, and implementing the Patriot Act throughout this country.…

    • 836 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Two Presidencies Theory

    • 876 Words
    • 4 Pages

    While the president is able to pass executive orders to change policy, these orders may be defunded by congress, counteracted by congressional legislation, or deemed unconstitutional by the Supreme Court. In addition, although a president is able to veto legislation, if a president continually vetoes legislation, the public may not look on him/her favorably, which would impact their electability. These factors seem to limit the president’s power greatly; however, so long as the president’s executive order is not unconstitutional, the president still wields remarkable power, as Congress would need a majority opposition in order to defund the president’s executive order. Furthermore, many of the president’s constituents could be swayed if the president were to deliver a speech concerning the necessity of his executive order. The executive branch, being the largest branch in government, requires that the president divides his power among the vice president, department heads, and heads of independent agencies in order to accomplish all of the administration’s tasks.…

    • 876 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They are use to set policy’s while avoiding debates and opposition. They have been used to direct a range of activities. Executive orders has become a significant tool in presidency…

    • 939 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “The modern presidency is something of a media invention, partly out of convenience – we need a protagonist, a character through which to tell the story of American politics” (Achenbach). There is no argument that the President hold enormous influence on the nation and the world. By going public the President can gather support directly from citizens for a certain law, bill, treaty, war, etc., and while he or she might not be able to rally the entire nation in his or her favor, an address from the President has a tremendous pull on the nation or will at least get the world talking. But when it comes to policy making, the President influence is much more limited. For example, although the President can institute executive orders, these orders can be overturned by congressional hearing, judicial review, or the next president in office.…

    • 784 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    According to an article on the Cornell University Law School, The Second Amendment of the United States Constitution reads: "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed". This is one of the Constitutional rights that was given to us by our founding fathers. To impose executive orders and bypass congress is illegal and simply unconstitutional. So now that…

    • 1431 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The power of the Executive Branch is limited through judicial review, which is a process where legislative action must be reviewed by the judicial branch to make sure it conforms with the constitution. Therefore, the president isn’t able to freely make decisions that could hurt the…

    • 1445 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Comparison and Distinction of the U.S and Nevada Constitutions Xitlali Salas 1 A Comparison and Distinction of the United States and Nevada Constitutions As the foundations and frameworks for a government, constitutions play crucial roles in shaping the way a state and nation are run. While the Constitution of the United States outlines the way the federal government is run and act as the supreme law, each state has its own constitution to lay out the way its own government will run.…

    • 982 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays