Life Sentence

Improved Essays
No Child Should Have a Life Sentence in Prison 14-year-old Kenneth Young received four life sentences in prison. He was convinced and forced to participate in assisting a 24-year-old male rob a convenience store. Kenneth was not a primary participant in this doing; he was only the second man and wasn’t in contact with victims or even within the general area of where the money was. He was the one to take care of getting the tape out of the recorder. Kenneth was only 14-years-old, meaning he was a minor when this crime took place. This adult to do this with him by threatening Kenneth had manipulated him. Minors especially are easily manipulative because they follow others. The court systems punish minors/kids much harsher than adults. Kenneth …show more content…
According to Randy Otto, a Criminal Psychologist states that adolescents are very different because of their “susceptibility to persuasion and their natural instincts to follow others”. Another reason why they are different is because they take less of a concern, it’s harder for them to see another person’s point of viewed, and they have a harder time wrapping their head around the consequences that are at hand (Randy Otto). This evidence is proven and should be used in the court system to show sympathy and understanding of why the teenager or minor was involved if persuasion was used. 70% of children that have life sentences in prison have committed their crimes with an adult. This represents a large majority of the minors that commit crimes are encouraged and persuaded into thinking that it is acceptable to do such a thing by other adults. Since adolescents are the easiest to persuade into doing bad things, they are punished harsher than adults. It’s a sort of scare tactic but it’s victimizing all children who have been convicted for a crime. The court system are assigning or giving children harsher penalties due to their age. Adults may receive only one life sentence without parole, where on the other hand a minor may receive up to four life sentences. In the documentary (Children in Prison for Life Sentence) Kenneth Young was 14 when he was convicted and received four life sentences. While the brains of the operation, a 24 year-old black male was only sentenced for only a single life sentence. Yes both roughly the same length but it’s apparent that the adolescents are treated unfairly in the court systems. The worst part of the injustice system is that one of the biggest, most biased factors that play a role in deciding the final discipline is

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    In the documentary 15 to Life, Kenneth Young was 14 years old when the first crime happened, he attempted robbery and attempted robbery another 3 times. Kenneth was charged with 4 consecutive life sentences without the possibility of parole for all robberies at age 14/15, while Jacque Bethea a 24-year-old man was tried and sentence to 1 concurrent life sentence; which is a lesser sentence than the juvenile. Kenneth was able to get a resentencing under Graham v Florida, which states that children are different from adults. Even though the offenders do everything possible to rehabilitated while in prison the court/judge doesn’t believe that is enough to resentence Kenneth.…

    • 284 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Re Gault Case Essay

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This case changed my outlook far as execution of juveniles. This case involved Simmons a young man that had a murder charge. I feel at age 17 you should be aware of our actions and with the fact that he bragged about the killing was an eye-opener to think of the possibility that this individual could have had mental issues or suffered some type of abuse as a youngster, that may have caused him to carry out this act of violence. I don’t feel he should have been executed due to these possibilities; however, a tough sentence should have been enacted. This case changed the development of sentencing anyone under the age of 18 to death it was ruled cruel and usual punishment.…

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Criminal Justice Frontline’s video, “Second Chance Kids,” takes its viewers through a controversial topic: life in prison for those who committed crimes as teens. Before the mid 2000s, teenagers who murdered someone get sentenced to life without parole. The arguments that teenagers grow up and change convinced courts to reconsider giving parole to those who were convicted for their crimes made as a teen. In one case, Anthony Rolon was 17 years old when he committed a crime. He was helping his father with selling drugs but a party next doors got really loud.…

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Children committing heinous crimes are not a rare occurrence anymore; the upsetting reality requires new tactics for dealing with young juveniles. Some Americans believe children should be tried as adults, yet others feel that they are too young to understand their wrong doings. In most conditions minors are quickly told they are too young or too old for something, however before being sent to an adult facility we need to contemplate all aspects of the case in order to decided whether or not being tried as an adult is necessary. Regardless of the crime, some people feel that an adult facility is not a suitable environment for children to serve their sentences.…

    • 1083 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of the reasons juveniles should not receive life sentences without parole is because juvenile brains are not fully developed until adulthood. According to Paul Thompson a USC neurologist researcher, “In terms of cognitive development, as research on the human brain [of juveniles] is far from adulthood” (Thompson). Adults need to understand that juveniles are still juveniles. When juveniles are charged with a heinous crime, like murder, they need to not overlook the fact that a juveniles brain is undeveloped.…

    • 810 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Children ranging from the ages of thirteen and up have been tried in court as adults and are faced with harsh sentences to die in prison without the slightest consideration of their circumstances and age for the offense penalized against them. Justice Elena Kagan, writing for the majority, determined that “requiring that all children convicted of homicide receive lifetime incarceration without possibility of parole, regardless of their age and age-related characteristics and the nature of their crimes” is a violation of the Eighth Amendment’s ban on cruel and unusual punishment (Cost of Mass Incarceration). According to Stevenson, “The U.S. is also the only country with life sentences without parole for 13 year-olds…. kids don’t have the judgment, the maturity, the impulse control and insight necessary to make complicated lifelong decisions. They can’t make the same kind of long-term judgments.…

    • 793 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Horrendous crimes have to be committed in order to be sentenced without parole. There are currently many countries in the world that punish underage criminals without ever giving them the opportunity to be free again, such as the United States, where around 2000 young criminals are imprisoned. Athough some crimes are too atrocious to be ever forgiven, it is of fundamental importance to take into consideration that children and teenagers are not fully mentally, physically, and emotionally developed, and they should not, therefore, be treated as adults while tried. It can be argued that crimes such as rape, murder, and kidnapping are so horrible that the criminal individuals deserve not to be ever given an opportunity to be reintegrated into society again. These individuals have committed such terrible actions that it would be unfair as well as dangerous to give them a second chance.…

    • 501 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Criminal Justice Model

    • 1005 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Online Class Paper In 2010 the U.S Supreme Court ruled juvenile life sentences are illegal for crimes less than murder. More than 2,500 inmates are sentence to life as children, 128 have a chance to obtain release. Kenneth Young is trying to reduce his sentence for a mistake he made when he was fifteen years old. On Saturday July 1st, 2000 Kenneth Young committed an armed robbery with twenty-four year old Jacques Bethea.…

    • 1005 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Children are usually seen as innocent, as they play around with others and are just balls of energy. Often seen as simply kids who have no experience in the outside world until they grow older. However, sometimes a child’s play can go wrong and can affect another’s life. When these incidents happen where a death is involved, it’s often easy for society to look at the offender as a murder who should be in prison for the rest of their life despite what age the offender may be. While juveniles committing heinous crimes should be punished, they should also be given the chance to rejoin society at an appropriate age; therefore juveniles who redeem themselves should be able to get released earlier and be able to put their life together.…

    • 1190 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I think a person should be at least 16 before they can be charged with life without parole, and it also depends on what they’ve done or how important it is. “More than 25% of people serving life without parole after being sentenced as children were convicted of felony murder or accomplice liability, meaning that they’re not primary perpetrators of that crime, and may have not even been present at the time someone was killed.” I think that this shouldn’t happen because the primary person could’ve tricked the minor into doing something and they wouldn’t have known what they were really doing. Yes they should still be punished, but not as severe as life without parole.…

    • 408 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There have been many opinions on juveniles being convicted as adults on the crimes they have committed. When it comes to some of these harsh crimes, who could not punish the individual to the fullest? It does not matter how old a person is because everyone knows the difference between right and wrong. If someone is raised differently and believes it is okay to murder another human, than they cannot just change their mindset. An individual that makes and adult decision should have the same consequences.…

    • 1231 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Juveniles and Life Sentences Do juveniles deserve mandatory life in prison for their crimes or should they have the opportunity to receive a second chance? In 2012, the Supreme Court ruled that mandatory life sentences for any crime are now illegal to give to juveniles meaning that juveniles are no longer allowed to serve mandatory life sentences in prison. This ruling is agreeable because juveniles are not fully developed, and it is unfair for juveniles to serve mandatory life sentences. Juveniles do not deserve life sentences because the teenage brain is not fully developed.…

    • 709 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Children In Prisons

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages

    I believe that children under the age of fourteen should not receive life in prison. When you put a child in an adult court system, that gives them a very high chance of being out into an adult detention facility. Whether the crime be violent or nonviolent shouldn't affect whether or not the child is prosecuted in an adult court system. There are thirteen states in the US that will try children as adults because, “some criminologists warned that young, male, predominately black "superpredators" would soon unleash a national crime wave” (EJI 1). Children as young as eight have been tried as adults for both violent and nonviolent crimes.…

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The decision of juveniles being tried as adults in the world of criminal justice has usually been an object of controversy. Some agree that an adolescent who commits a serious crime like murder deserves to be penalized exactly like an adult; while others declare that a minor should not face the same punishment as an adult. However, no matter how severe or appalling a crime may be, juveniles should not be tried as adults; the reason being that everyone should be granted the chance to learn from their mistakes. Juveniles should not be punished as adults, simply because they biologically distinct from adults. Teenagers are the midsection between children and adults.…

    • 1250 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A rise in juvenile crime is becoming more and more of an issue in the present day. The only way to resolve this problem is to start sanctioning violent juveniles as adults. Juveniles should be able to be charged as adults in court because they commit violent crimes, they know the difference between right and wrong, communities would be safer, and juveniles would be deterred from committing crimes in the present and the future. Even though they are younger, juveniles are just as capable of committing the same violent crimes as adults. When they do, juveniles should receive the same sentence for committing the same crime.…

    • 1401 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays