Net Neutrality Research Paper

Great Essays
Net Neutrality and Data Discrimination “They who can give up their essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” Benjamin Franklin, Memoirs of the life & writings of Benjamin Franklin. When you sacrifice your freedoms for security you deserve neither. The same goes for internet freedoms. When you sacrifice the freedom and openness of the internet for any type of law you deserve nothing. The internet started on the basis of the words, free, open and neutral. These words later formed the term called “Net Neutrality” or the full form “Network Neutrality”. The most common and important principle for Net Neutrality is that internet service providers and governments should treat all data equally. Not discriminating or charging differently by user, website, platform, application, type or attached equipment, or mode of communication.
The term “Net Neutrality” or “Network Neutrality” came from a paper by Tim Wu called Network Neutrality, Broadband Discrimination. In his paper he describes Net Neutrality as no service provider shall favor content of any kind over any other content. Content of which being no website, no application, and no content shall be blocked or limited by any service provider.
The principles of Net Neutrality has developed over the years and today the common
…show more content…
What is called today as “data discrimination” which started long ago in the 1900s and even today there are still cases of data discrimination. Data discrimination is the act of selective filtering of information by service provider. Some forms of data discrimination can be called “Bandwidth Throttling”, “Capping” or “Bandwidth capping”, “Artificial Limiting”, and “Paid Prioritization”. Each of these definitions

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    The term net neutrality was first coined back in the year of 2003 by Columbia University media law professor Tim Wu as an extension the concept of a common carrier. The basic principle definition is that there should be Internet equality for everyone regardless of content, platform, application, attached equipment, or mode of communication. It is essentially a type of civil rights movement for the use of the Internet. It also means that no phone company can limit what you can access on your phone such as text, certain apps, and Internet usage. For example in 2007 denied access for its users from sending donations via text messaging to an pro-choice abortion service citing that they as a company did not believe the campaign.…

    • 1266 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Network Neutrality Nuances, Barbara van Schewick argues her stance on network neutrality, and how without it we would be under the relentless abuse of our ISPs. By utilizing a multitude of examples and propositions, she manages to engross the reader in a series of possibilities of what could occur without network neutrality, and how it acts as a measure against discrimination Barbara starts off her point of view by firmly introducing us into net neutrality, and how it is basically the wall that stops a digital divide. Focusing on 3 subjects in specific, the piece introduces the reader to why we should worry about network neutrality, the incentives ISPs have to do it and why arguments against net neutrality are invalid. Barbara very convincingly…

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Net neutrality allows citizens the right to access the same content as everyone else without blocking or slowing down that citizen’s bandwidth.…

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Most of us probably believe we have absolute freedom when it comes to what we view on the internet. However, Barbara van Schewick points out in her article ‘Network Neutrality Nuances’, that we only have access to bits and pieces of the internet (Schewick, 2009). What we are able to view is all decided upon by our ISP. Schewick states that ISPs select what we view in order to maximize profits, to ban content which they consider to be inappropriate, or to keep track of all signals on their network (Schewick, 2009). She does an excellent job of explaining why this is wrong by bringing forth real world examples, using thought-provoking literary devices, as well as by connecting with the reader (Schewick, 2009).…

    • 782 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) adopted a set of rules that would make sure the internet would remain an open and free place. This issue was sparked up when it was discovered that Internet Broadband Providers (ISPs) had the ability to manipulate data as they saw fit for their own profit. In order to uphold the policies that help keep the average person’s data out of their ISP’s hands, a presidential candidate who supports net neutrality must be elected. Bernie Sanders is the best candidate to defend net neutrality because he's against corporate control, spying on American citizens, and supports the FCC's regulations. The internet has become an integral part of American educational, business, and recreational life.…

    • 640 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In the mockumentary, “Leaked: The Internet Must Go”, a market researcher, John Wooley, was hired by Internet service providers (ISP) to do market research and talk to people to help them sell their new vision; eliminating net neutrality to reach maximum profit potential. Over many years, ISP has spent billions of dollars to build towers that bring Americans the Internet. However, they believe that there is too much traffic. Their solution to this problem is the “Internet must go”. ISP wanted to create innovative new ways to charge Internet users for the sites they want; however, the only thing stopping them is net neutrality and keeping the Internet open.…

    • 1128 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The controversy around net neutrality is pretty common, many think the government shouldn’t be wanting the people to be paying so much for something that everyone uses in their everyday life for useful purposes, while the other portion aren’t aware of net neutrality and or they simply do not care. Net neutrality limits people from seeing what is fully out there which can potentially be a good idea or one of the worst ones yet. Paying for such a thing, and paying a good price and not getting what you fully pay for is frustrating yet calming. The government is wanting to protect the general population from seeing something most have most likely seen, knowing what is out there in the world is one of the most asked questions.…

    • 319 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Good morning Mrs. Facciolo and classmates, today I'm going to talk to you about net neutrality, more specifically; what it is, what's happening to it now, and why you should care. Let's get into it. Net neutrality is the idea that internet service providers shouldn't be allowed to unfairly treat or grant special treatment to particular sites and apps. Under the current net neutrality rules, broadband and wireless providers like Rogers and Bell, can't block or slow down your access to lawful content, nor can they make "fast lanes" for content providers who are willing to pay extra. In other words, your internet provider can't slow your video stream so you'll keep your cable plan, and your mobile carrier can't stop you from using video chat instead of your own cell phone minutes.…

    • 540 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    By the end of this paper you will have a better understanding of net neutrality and be able to make your own decisions on what you think of it. The effectiveness of net neutrality is still being determine. The definition of net neutrality as described by…

    • 1130 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Of course, this didn’t happen, but because of these fears, the new rules faced a lot of opposition. Those who thought it was unnecessary had thought processes like the process the Uwire author had where he stated that if AT&T, for example, imposed new restrictions on access to websites and services, customers would simply leave AT&T and go to a different provider and AT&T would suffer. What this author doesn’t take into account is that many people have only one high-speed ISP available to them, and thus when an ISP pushes out new restrictions and costs, they have no choice but to accept these new costs and restrictions. Under net neutrality laws, we wouldn’t have to deal with restricted access to websites and lowered speeds because the laws would prevent ISPs from imposing these restrictions and access to websites and services would be equal in every area. Explaining this to the public would lessen resistance to the new laws and increase support for the new laws.…

    • 1414 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Everyone in this room uses the internet, probably daily, but many of you may not realise a threat which could harm the way our internet works, net neutrality intends to protect us consumers from the threats. Net Neutrality is often mistaken to be related to censorship, or other seemingly unethical act, that's just a small part, the idea of Net Neutrality is, in a nutshell, that all data carried over the internet should be treated equally. This means that any organisation, government or corporate, cannot control the way data is shared. You should be able to access Youtube, Facebook, and all your favourite websites at the same speed as fast your Internet offers.…

    • 914 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The main idea is that individual users should be in charge of the content and apps they use on the internet and that the local internet providers should not restrict their use. The internet is unique with how it allows equal access and participation for all users without a sing entity regulating content (Fieser). Traditional media outlets all have strict editorial policies that restrict their content based on political interest, controversy, ideology, space limitations, and other innumerable factors. The internet is most likely the only major media outlet that doesn’t require going through such editorial scrutiny (Fieser). Defenders of internet neutrality work to preserve this freedom from restriction.…

    • 1586 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The concept of net neutrality, an Obama-era regulation that prohibits internet service providers from speeding up, slowing down or blocking any content, applications or websites you want to use, according to freepress.net, is a necessary rule that will keep citizens free and private and keep the internet neutral, hence the name. The law is necessary because without regulations, large corporations can monitor what we see on the internet, and there will be no way for us to know what is real and what is not. There will be no truth or freedom of press except what multinational, billionaire corporations want us to…

    • 694 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Communications Act is a law that has an impact not only on those subjected to its authority but also on the development of future technologies and the greater social order. 82 years after its enactment, the Communications Act is at the center of a controversy seemingly unforeseeable in 1934, Net Neutrality. An open Internet, or Net Neutrality, is possible due to regulations of the Communications Act…

    • 1752 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Today, our society is centered around technology. The internet is used globally containing all aspects of life ranging from politics to education to entertainment. Although the internet has become a necessity in the development of civilization, the privacy and security it provides has come into question. Countries such as China and North Korea decided to regulate the information provided to their citizens through the internet, which, I happen to disagree with, and has sparked some discussion. I believe the government should not be allowed to regulate/ censor information on the internet as it violates the First Amendment, it is shown to be oppressive in other countries, and people will be able to find a way around it.…

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays