• Home Page
  • Why Did The British Take The Suez Canal

Why Did The British Take The Suez Canal

Improved Essays
Show More
Ever wonder what it would be like with two world power an another ally against Egypt would end? With Egypt having home land, and a nasty storm for the British and the French, Egypt came out in top! With Israel, the UK, the French being mad at Nasser for nationalizing the canal, and the invasion, a lot of things happened concerning the Suez Canal Israel will want to control the Suez Canal for multiple reasons, they might want the money that may come from it, or they may just want to see who is trying to get through the canal. (Jazeera 2008) Also they may want to control it for yet another reason, that may want to be able to control who gets to be able to get through the canal. If they do not like who wants to come through they could find them more, or not even let them …show more content…
It was being controlled by the Suez company , which British had a huge amount of stock, so they were in semi control. Having said that, it was an anglo-french company. Meaning it was mainly supported/owned by the British and the French. (The Editors of Encyclopædia Britannica 2017) They also wanted to take back the canal, as I had stated before, the company was partly owned by the British, so Britain wants their canal back. Nasser took their canal, and they wanted it back. They also may want it back just so they can go back to normal. (U.S. Department of State 1953-1960)
As stated earlier the Suez company is also partly controlled by the French. They were also mad that Nasser took the canal because they also lost the control of the canal along with the British so they were also qualified to be mad at Nasser for taking the canal.(U.S. Department of State 1953-1960) Another huge factor was that they thought that Nasser and Egypt were supporting the Algerian rebellion. They were proven right when they found out more information. That got them even more mad than them just nationalizing the canal! (Jazeera

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    How Did The British Lose The American Revolution
    • 1894 Words
    • 8 Pages

    How Did The British Lose The American Revolution

    Was American success in achieving independence due more to the strategic skill of George Washington or to the operational and strategic mistakes of the British?…

    • 1894 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Alexander The Great Cleopatra
    • 1680 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Alexander The Great Cleopatra

    For the next five-hundred years, Rome’s influence grew and its land expanded. During Rome’s early history, it was plagued with civil wars, and with the building of an empire, comes incredible expenses. As Egypt was one of the only regions around the Mediterranean that was not yet conquered, they had a target on by Rome for their wealth. To keep Rome from taking Egypt, the Pharaoh’s would use their money to protect them. They would find the men of influence in Rome and pay these men off, which served the interests of everyone involved. This agreement worked perfectly until the pharaoh, Ptolemy XXII, found himself running out of money. Ptolemy XXII was Cleopatra’s father. Starting with Ptolemy IX, Egypt went into decline, losing money and land. By the time Ptolemy XXII came into power, Egypt’s vulnerabilities became exposed. It was around this time that Cleopatra was born. Around the time of Cleopatra’s birth, Egypt, losing Alexandrian support and running out of money and resources to pay Rome off to keep their sovereignty, was in danger of coming to an…

    • 1680 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Tang Empress Wu Zetian Analysis
    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Tang Empress Wu Zetian Analysis

    These women fought a good fight but Cleopatra lost the fight at the end. After the death of Cleopatra, Rome still took over Egypt.…

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    How Did The British Lead To American Revolution
    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages

    How Did The British Lead To American Revolution

    In the 13 years leading to the American Revolution the British helped the American colonies gain land from the Native Americans. The American colonies signed an agreement with the British Government to help pay for the debts incurred by the French and Indian War. But the American colonies were taxed more with taxes like the Sugar Act and Currency Act. Which led to protests by the American colonies. Then this led to the American colonies to be taxed even more than before. In conclusion, this war could have been avoided if the British Government considered what the colonies wanted and if the colonies complied with the British governments demands.…

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    The British Empire: The Suez Canal
    • 1894 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The British Empire: The Suez Canal

    When the Egyptian president, Gamal Abdel Nasser proclaimed to nationalise the Suez Canal Company, Britain and France invaded Egypt in order to regain the control of the Suez Canal.…

    • 1894 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Why Did The Us Build The Panama Canal
    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Why Did The Us Build The Panama Canal

    The decision was decided to make the canal because of technical advances and increased pressure from European people. The idea of the canal was a sea level canal, or known as a tidal canal. We really just wanted a canal for easier transportation and movement of merchant ships. However, the process of constructing the canal got difficult. But they still tried because, creating the canal was just really convenient for both sides. The U.S bought the project from the French for $40 million, “Colombia signed a treaty with the U.S. granting permission to construct the canal through their sovereign territory.”…

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Decent Essays

    Compare Why Did The British Beat The French And Indian War
    • 91 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Compare Why Did The British Beat The French And Indian War

    The British beat the French in the French and Indian War. Of course, with them doing this, they also gained a lot more land. The British then had a higher demand for slave labor due to more land. They had taken over the majority of North America. This is why the demand for slave labor grew there. They needed slaves in northern America because they already had enough where they had previously owned land. They really just needed to even it out. This was the main cause for slave labor increase.…

    • 91 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More
  • Decent Essays

    Why Colonists Won The War
    • 188 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Why Colonists Won The War

    The three pry marmy reasons that the colonists won the war are the battle of saratoga, the geography, and George Washington’s motto. The battle of saratoga was very important not because they weakened the british army but because of the britishes enemy france helped us because we proved that the colonists had a fighting chance so the french provided us a navy. Geography was in the colonists favor because the british resources were an ocean away and communication was slow for the same reason, not to mention that colonists climate was much more harsh. Washington's motto is what made the war go on so long because the colonists “lived to fight another day” the war stretched to long for the britishes budget it virtually won the war.…

    • 188 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    All The Shah's Men Essay
    • 2144 Words
    • 9 Pages

    All The Shah's Men Essay

    Following World War II, many different countries were left in ruins and began to rebuild, especially in Europe. Iran specifically, was recovering from being invaded by Soviet and British troops after being a neutral country in the war. In the book titled All the Shah’s Men, we get a more focused glimpse on Iran and all the foreign powers influencing the nation. Iran was ruled as a monarchy until 1979, and each king or emperor is given the title of “shah”. Every Shah ruled until death or they were overthrown. With the finding of the oil industry in Iran in 1901 and British William D’Arcy being given concession to develop the industry, many countries saw interest in Iran. The fight for oil began, and continued even after the Majlis nationalized the industry in 1951 with the help of the newly elected Prime Minister Mohammad Mossadegh. Mossadegh was at first considered not a threat by the United States, but because of the ongoing fear of communism during the Cold War the view on Mossadegh shifted radically. This shift in views in the United States leads to the 1953 Iranian coup. The book All the Shah’s Men by Stephen Kinzer draws through the events leading up to the 1953…

    • 2144 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Who Won The Panama Canal?
    • 1316 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Who Won The Panama Canal?

    In the early 1800’s America and Britain wanted to created a more efficient and easier way to trade between the Atlantic and Pacific coasts. They originally planned to build a canal in Nicaragua. However, it really never got any much further than planning the outline. After the failed attempt of the French trying to build a canal through Panama, the Americans decided they wanted to continue what was once started. John Hay and President Roosevelt were then met with the government of Panama to come to agreements with the construction of what is now known as the Panama Canal and known to be the center of global…

    • 1316 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Gelvin The Modern Middle East Summary
    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Gelvin The Modern Middle East Summary

    Each of the entente powers, they had certain areas of the Middle East that they wanted to have control of. For example, Russia has always wanted a warm water port, specifically the Turkish Straits. They, also, were interested in the Ottoman Palestine area for religious reasons. France thought they had ‘historic rights’ to the area of Syria and Lebanon. It is this area which France wanted to possess. The British wanted to control land that protected their sea route to India. These are the areas in which the entente powers negotiated to obtain in their secret agreements. They made these agreements to control their other allies and to encourage others, not allied with the entente or central, to help the entente powers. As the war came to a close, the entente powers had won. Once victory was declared, the entente powers wanted to implement the secret agreements, but this never came to fruition. One reason for these agreements failing is the involvement of the United States and Woodrow Wilson’s “Fourteen Points.” Instead of using their secret agreements, a mandate system was developed and used to reorganize the Middle East into…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    British Foreign Policy Failures
    • 1189 Words
    • 5 Pages

    British Foreign Policy Failures

    The role of individuals such as Eden and De Gaulle can be recognised to have caused foreign policy failures. De Gaulle for one vetoed Britain application into the EEC, creating foreign policy problems for the country by preventing it to be in with the political and economic inner circle. The French president can be seen to have brought Britain into its place by understanding Britain would be an awkward partner in the EEC. De Gaulle wanted to limit the growing influence the USA was obtaining, especially in Europe therefore by rejecting Britain application, De Gaulle was objecting to American interference that were pushing Britain to get into the EEC. Although Eden proclaimed himself to be an expert in foreign policy he created the biggest foreign policy failure which would in the coming decades always degrade Britain. Believing that Britain was still an Imperial power he is accused of literally forcing the cabinet to agree with him in dealing with the Suez situation which would turn into one of the biggest scandals in British history. Moreover, Britain did not try to join until 1961 after Suez and discontent with US as she still thought herself as a superpower and tried to create EFTA to rival EEC. British government did not see short term nature of Commonwealth benefits and…

    • 1189 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Ataturk Nasser And Modaddeq Essay
    • 721 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Ataturk Nasser And Modaddeq Essay

    Ataturk, Nasser and Mosaddeq were the leaders of three diverse regimes in the Middle east in the twentieth centuries. All three shared a lot of similarities while at the same time espousing many different views. Ataturk and Mosaddeq were both modern reformers and stridently anti-communist. All three were nationalists. All three nationalized industries within their respective countries. Nasser is knowing for his nationalization of the Suez Canal while Mosaddeq is remembered for nationalizing the oil industry. Ataturk created a national rail system and nationalized the tobacco industry. All three tried to minimalize foreign interference in their respective countries, in most cases by getting rid of British or French influence. All three leaders…

    • 721 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Decent Essays

    Should The Rhodians Be Favored?
    • 174 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Should The Rhodians Be Favored?

    But the sincerity of the Rhodian mediation efforts should not really be doubted. Rhodes had been willing to fight on the Seleukid side against Philadelphos in the Second Syrian War when she believed that the threat posed by Egypt was too great to tolerate. If Antiochos had suggested during the negotiations of 219/8 that Rhodes might be prejudiced in Egypt's favour, the Rhodians could have pointed to their conflict with the Ptolemies earlier in the century to prove that they were not blindly committed to Egypt's cause, right or wrong. They could also have argued that they had a formal friendship with both the Seleukid and the Ptolemaic kingdoms (Polybios 5.67, 11), and hence were appropriate mediators. In any case, there is no suggestion that…

    • 174 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    Colonization In Algeria Essay
    • 1570 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Colonization In Algeria Essay

    The colony of Algeria was one of many that was established by the French in order to rectify their diminishing image on the international spectrum. Throughout history, the nation of France has seemed to be in the shadows of Great Britain as well as struggling to keep up with their advancements. Throughout the 19th century, France experienced its fair share of losses, bad leaders, and through their eyes, national embarrassment. The revolution began in 1789 and ended in the late 1790s which marked the beginning of a New France. The new republic signified a New France and imperialistic pursuits were one way they intended to regain the stature that they had lost and longed for throughout the course of history. Algerian and French relations had…

    • 1570 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More

Related Topics

Ready To Get Started?
Discover
Company
Follow
©2023 Cram.com
Privacy Policy |  About Ads |  Site Map |  Advertise  | 
  • Cookie Settings