Ww2 Ethical Dilemmas

Improved Essays
What is morality? Surely it can’t be taking men, women, and children to a camp because you don’t like the color of their skin, their religion, or even what people from their home country have done. Sure, the Japanese bombed us first. But does that make it right to bomb them back? Twice at that. In my opinion, no. No matter how dangerous the enemy is, it is never right to attack innocent men, women and children. I feel that america was too afraid and tired of the war to realize that the japanese are human too and they do not deserve to die indiscriminately like that. Perhaps this is an example of a moral dilemma. We needed to protect ourselves and our allies, and maybe bombing seemed like a good idea, or possibly the only option we had left. However, the atomic bombs should have been the absolute last resort. they surrendered shortly after, and probably would have even if we only bombed once. It was in no way necessary to take a devastated country and kick it while it is down. The effects of the atomic bombs lasted years. Sure, this played a part in ending the war and saving lives of our own country and that of our allies’, but far too many people died and this may have been the event that made WWII the bloodiest war to date. Meanwhile, in america, we started calling japanese people “japs” and rounding them up to take them to one of these camps. Many of these people were american citizens that had lived here their entire lives or were born here. Tell me how that is in any way moral. Just because we are in a time of war, does not mean that we have the right to take away other people’s basic human rights. Not all is fair in love and war and we should all realize that other cultures are different from ours. People have different skin tones, different ways of life, and different religions, but we are all human and deserving of human rights and should show eachother love, and understanding. As for WWII being considered “the good war,” I agree and I disagree. We fought for the world order, where would the world be if we, being powerful allies, stayed out of it? …show more content…
In a continent overrun by Nazis, speaking up could definitely get you killed or even sent to a camp. While WWII was certainly a cruel war for all parties involved, the Nazis and hitler were probably the most cruel. Disabled people and jewish people were taken from their homes and their lives to become slaves. The able bodied did slave labor, ate very little and were eventually sent to the gas chambers where they were killed. The elderly, children and disabled often went to the chambers quickly because they could not work. I don’t think anyone chose inaction because they didn’t want to help, because anyone would be afraid to go to these camps and suffer for the rest of their lives, which were however long the Nazis decided for them to be. WWII was a terrible war in terms of blood, but the aftermath of the war in America was great. We formed powerful alliances, the great depression was effectively ended and the UN was formed, helping prevent another world

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In Document K Secretary of War Henry Stinson says clearly, “The decision to use the atomic bomb was a decision that brought death to over a hundred thousand Japanese… But this deliberate, premeditated destruction was our least abhorrent alternative”. America had been bombing civilian and industrial cities for almost a year which alone caused many more deaths than the bombs. Also, the operation to invade the Japanese mainland would have ended in a bloodbath of millions of civilian deaths including those in Hiroshima and Nagasaki because the Americans had already planned to bomb those industrial cities months before. It was fair for the Japanese to fear occupation but anyone could tell that the germans and the americans were some of the nicest…

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    I agree with what you are saying. The lives of the Japanese people could have been saved and taken into more consideration. Dropping of the Atomic bomb was preventable, but I think when considering that it was to show power I can see why they did it. That doesn't make it right by any means, we need to consider all sides of situation before taking…

    • 66 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Was America justified in dropping the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki? On August 6th, 1945, the US dropped an atomic bomb on the city of Hiroshima. It was the first time a nuclear weapon had been used in combat, against civilians. Between 40,000 and 60,00 people died instantly, and many more would die in the aftermath, either due to their injuries or radiation poisoning.…

    • 1739 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    ¨The Nazi concentration camps is a world turned upside down, a world in which nothing makes sense and nothing is as it should be ¨ (Sanderson). The amount of abhorrent things that were done to the Jews at camp were not okay in any type of way. At this time Jews were desperate for survival they would do anything to live or in some cases anything to die. Concentration camps got so horrid at times that Jews would rather be dead than living in one. ¨ Food and survival supersede everything else for prisoners; previously moral.…

    • 795 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The nuclear attack of Hiroshima and Nagasaki was not justifiable. Due to the fact that the Japanese government was already in the verge of surrendering to the American government.. Also the nuclear bombing was used for several causes, one of which was to cause fear to both the Japanese and Soviet governments. Finally, the bombing of both major cities in Japan caused many deaths, which were not strategic, nor useful towards the war.…

    • 1429 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    World War II left a permanent mark on the world. Gunshots could not be taken back and people are not disposable. That fact had to be set aside in order to defend what we believed in. The Holocaust; a destructive battle that the Jews would fight for with their lives.…

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    August 6th, 1945 will be a day never forgotten in history. The atomic bombs dropped in Hiroshima and Nagasaki will always be connected to Harry S. Truman’s presidency, and is ultimately one of the toughest decisions a president has had to make in United States’ past. Justifying the situation was even more challenging. Having to address the general public after the fact added onto the affair, and will never be an all around positive response to the decision made. There will always be questions beginning with “what if?”…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    You have heard two reasons why dropping the atomic bombs in Japan was not justified and unnecessary. But perhaps the most compelling reasons why dropping the bomb was not justified is that the United States was weeks or months away from Japan surrendering and the war ending before dropping the bombs and killing hundreds of thousands of innocent people. As you will hear from General Mitsuru Ushijima, Japan was already losing the war. The country was surrounded by US troops, Americans controlled Japanese airspace and waterways, and US casualties in military battles were low compared to Japanese. The US commanders knew that Japan was close to surrendering as Germany had already surrendered, and Russia, another powerful military force, was…

    • 318 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    “It would have been morally wrong if we’d have had that weapon (the atomic bomb) and not used it and let a million more people die.” stated Colonel Tibbets, the pilot of the Enola Gay. (Document L) The Enola Gay was the plane that dropped the first atomic weapon on Hiroshima. The Colonel was saying that if they had not dropped that bomb, it would have killed more of their men (the Americans), which would have been morally wrong because you are supposed to do what’s best for your team or army. The bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were definitely a Military Necessity because as stated earlier, a minimum of a million more people would have died if they did not follow through with the bombing. They needed to protect their own soldiers first.…

    • 1655 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In my opinion, United States were right on dropping the bombs. Although hundreds of innocent Japanese lives were lost, millions of American and Japanese lives could have been killed. An article on www.militarythistorynow.com before the decision to drop the bombs, there was Operation Downfall. Operation Downfall was the mission where US soldier would storm onto Japanese homeland but never happened. The article states, “Had the invasion not been preempted by the dropping of the atom bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, almost all agree that the campaign would have stood as the bloodiest chapter of the Second World War, adding as much as an additional 10 million dead”.…

    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Just as the US, the Japanese had done some things that would be considered immoral, but unlike the US’ unethical things that had been done, it wasn’t a controversial discussion because they had done such things as the Death March on Bataan and the attack on Pearl Harbor. The propaganda of the Japanese being the bad guys had put the them in such a spot as the US’ target of vehemence, as well as their culture preferring to die a fighter, to die in battle, rather than living and coming home due to submission. Many people in the US had felt the Japanese deserved what they got from the bomb because they were still hurt, like a man called William T Laurence, a journalist who was aboard the Enola Gay when they dropped the bomb on Nagasaki, and he stated, “Does one feel any pity or compassion for the poor devils about to die? Not when one thinks of Pearl Harbor and the Death March on Bataan.” Even President Truman felt a strong sense of dislike towards them, going as far as calling them beasts for the things the Japanese had done, and although he claimed he was ‘disturbed’ about the use of the Atomic Bombs, he felt that the attack on Pearl Harbor and the Death March on Bataan were far worse, “When you have to deal with a beast, you have to treat him as a…

    • 1031 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ethical Issues In Ww2

    • 1486 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Decades later, people are still debating the morals of Truman by ordering the bomb on Japan. The unfortunate loss of over 200,000 civilians is tragic, but war is never a pretty sight. Looking…

    • 1486 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Fight for Morality In an Unjust World: World War II At what point do morals seem to offer less hope and reason, and anger and violence take total control? When the war goes on for six years, and one day. How much suffering, segregation, racism, violence, and psychological damage must you see before losing all hope in those around you, and the ideals you were brought up with. “All human beings are created equal and are endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights”, I’d like to believe this is true, but as you and so many others know is not the life many lived during World War II.…

    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, world war two was not a disagreement to cause destruction towards the countries. The U.S was justified in dropping atomic bombs as it was an alternative to end the war at an instance and to also prevent the death rate of civilians. This was also necessary as it was America’s desire to shorten the war if the Japanese surrendered. In addition, the USA were acting against the Japanese in…

    • 1213 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The United States is the only country that used a nuclear weapon in a war. Both atomic bombs were dropped on Japan. The Little Boy was dropped on Hiroshima and the Fat Man dropped on Nagasaki. It all started with President Roosevelt in 1939, when Roosevelt authorized the Manhattan Project, a secret project to expand research on nuclear fission to make nuclear weapons. Truman then became president when Roosevelt died in 1945.…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays