Consequences Of The Atomic Bomb

Improved Essays
In 1945, the US and Japan were at war. The Pacific War was a brutal one between the two countries, and neither were willing to surrender, nor face the possible consequences of surrendering. In an act of desperation to get Japan to surrender, the US dropped what is called the ‘Atomic Bomb’ on Japan, successfully ending the war between them. Although the bomb had ended the war between the US and Japan, the US shouldn’t have dropped the Atomic Bomb because designing and building it was rather costly, the US was prejudiced towards the Japanese, and the full knowledge of the effects the bomb would cause was lacking tremendously, especially in long term effects. Designing and building the Atomic Bomb was very expensive. The building of the bomb …show more content…
Just as the US, the Japanese had done some things that would be considered immoral, but unlike the US’ unethical things that had been done, it wasn’t a controversial discussion because they had done such things as the Death March on Bataan and the attack on Pearl Harbor. The propaganda of the Japanese being the bad guys had put the them in such a spot as the US’ target of vehemence, as well as their culture preferring to die a fighter, to die in battle, rather than living and coming home due to submission. Many people in the US had felt the Japanese deserved what they got from the bomb because they were still hurt, like a man called William T Laurence, a journalist who was aboard the Enola Gay when they dropped the bomb on Nagasaki, and he stated, “Does one feel any pity or compassion for the poor devils about to die? Not when one thinks of Pearl Harbor and the Death March on Bataan.” Even President Truman felt a strong sense of dislike towards them, going as far as calling them beasts for the things the Japanese had done, and although he claimed he was ‘disturbed’ about the use of the Atomic Bombs, he felt that the attack on Pearl Harbor and the Death March on Bataan were far worse, “When you have to deal with a beast, you have to treat him as a …show more content…
A Japanese physician at the time had taken account of people who were there during the bombing of Hiroshima, observing the victims and their deaths, describing the cause of deaths for the ones who died. Some died instantly, some it took a couple of days and some had gotten radiation sickness before they died as well. He had taken note of the way the sickness presented itself, like anorexia, vomiting, vomiting blood and coughing up blood. Even though the bomb had killed less people in its short term effects than the other bombs they used, (the ones that weren’t nuclear) the long term effects were far worse, like a death caused by the radiation sickness or suffering for several days from being burnt half to death. Even a man who was in Hiroshima at the time of the bombing, attending class, claimed there wasn’t much knowledge of radioactivity at the time. When the US demonstrated the bomb out in the middle of nowhere, in a desert in New Mexico, to show the Japanese what the bomb could do, to warn them of what would happen should they choose to not surrender, the effects of the bomb were unknown and the Japanese didn’t quite feel threatened by it and didn’t even bother to respond to the warning, so they didn’t surrender until after the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki proved of the horrible effects and damage the bombs could

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In the aftermath of the Japanese bombing of Pearl Harbor the United States retaliated on August 6, 1945, at 8:15 a.m. the crew of the Enola Gay dropped an atomic bomb over the city of Hiroshima. The bomb detonated 2,000 feet above the center of Hiroshima, destroying 60% of the city and killing an estimated 70,000 to 100,000 people immediately. Due to amount of civilian deaths this led to, we often ask ourselves if the bombings over these Japanese cities were necessary. To debate wether the bombing was necessary we should pay attention to Japans decision to continue to not surrender after the first bombing. If a country is that proud and resilient for them to still refuse to surrender after one nuclear bombing killing between 70,000 to 100,000…

    • 296 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of the most controversial decisions in American history was Harry S. Truman’s decision to use atomic bombs on Japan during World War II. On August 6, 1945, the United States dropped an atomic bomb on the Japanese city of Hiroshima and killed between 70,000 and 80,000 Japanese people. After three days, another bomb was dropped on Nagasaki and killed 70,000 people immediately. Radiation from the bombs led to extensive damage as well. The Japanese then chose to surrender on September 2 which marked the end of the great war.…

    • 876 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On August 6, 1945, in response to World War II and Japan’s vicious attacks on the U.S., the United States launched the atomic bomb “Little Boy” on the city of Hiroshima, Japan. 80,000 people died, and sixty percent of the city was destroyed. Three days later, a second bomb was dropped on Nagasaki, in which killed 70,000 people instantaneously and many more in the following weeks. These atomic bombs resulted in pure destruction and chaos for Japan and its people. Although the atomic bombs destroyed part of Japan and took many lives with them, the dropping of the atomic bombs were justified because the U.S. aimed for the complete and utter destruction of Japan and Japan remained a major threat that needed to be eliminated.…

    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Atomic Bomb Dbq

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages

    " On the other hand, the United States’ decision to drop the atomic bomb on Hiroshima was a military measure to ensure that Japan would fully surrender. In Document H titled, Radio Address, Harry S Truman, President Truman stated, “We have used it in order to shorten the agony of war, in order to save the lives of thousands and thousands of young Americans.” He stated that the U.S had used the atomic bombs to end the war quickly and to save more American lives. However, as said by General HH Arnold, the Japanese were already on the verge of collapse.” This meant that even if the bombs weren’t used, then Japan still would have…

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although, my grandma was too young to understand the impact, her mother and father were enraged. Once the U.S. dropped the bomb on a Japan city, they believed it was payback for Pearl Harbor. Japan’s efforts, after the Aug. 6 bombing of Hiroshima, to influence public opinion in Europe and North America in the hope that it would stop the United States from dropping the second bomb. After the United States successfully detonated the world’s first atomic bomb in a July 1945 test, President Harry S. Truman and fellow Allied leaders, Josef Stalin and Clement Attlee, issued the Potsdam Declaration, an ultimatum for Japan to surrender unconditionally or face “prompt and utter destruction. Prior to that, the Natzies were putting the Jewish families into concentration camps, watching her family and friends get taken away.…

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The atomic bomb was used in WW II. In 1939, the world’s scientific community discovered that German physicists had learned the secrets of splitting an uranium atom (“The Manhattan Project”). In late 1941, the American effort to design and build an atomic bomb received its code name -- the Manhattan Project, which included scientists David Bohm, Leo Szilard, Eugene Wigner, Otto Frisch, Rudolf Peierls, Felix Bloch, Niels Bohr, Emilio Segre, James Franck, Enrico Fermi, Klaus Fachs, and Edward Teller (“The Manhattan Project”). The chief among the people who unleashed the power of the uranium atom was Robert Oppenheimer, who oversaw the project from conception to completion to make sure that nothing would go wrong (Bellis). There were two bombs that were dropped miles apart in different cities, Hiroshima and Nagasaki, in Japan (“The…

    • 660 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On August 6, 1945 the United States dropped bombs killing thousands of people on Japan, which effectively ended the Second World War. The bombings against Japan were necessary because they had warnings and a chance to surrender, things could have ended up worse, and most of all it protected the lives of the US. Japan didn’t have a direct warning that the US was going to bomb them, but there was a statement encouraging Japan to surrender while the bomb was still being talked about. Japan didn’t surrender. For months we dropped more than 63 million leaflets across Japan, warning them of bombings.…

    • 319 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Atomic Bomb Dbq Essay

    • 1266 Words
    • 6 Pages

    usage of the atomic bombs was militarily unnecessary and immoral. Furthermore, it lead to the extensive loss of civilian life, therefore making these bombings justifiable only to a lesser extent. However, supporters of the bombings generally are of the opinion that they were instrumental in the Japanese surrender. These supporters also believe that the bombings were beneficial in preventing casualties on both sides, and helped in protecting America from further attacks, especially by Japan. Even before the atomic bombs were dropped, Japan’s surrender was imminent (Source B, Extract 1).…

    • 1266 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Atomic Bomb DBQ Essay

    • 1374 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The use of the Atomic Bomb was both necessary and justified as it immediately ended World War II, solidified the United States as a superpower, and contained the germinating powers of Japan and Russia. The use of the Atomic Bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki immediately ended World War II and stopped the continuation of catastrophic and widespread violence in Japan. The Japanese had an audacious outlook on their offense throughout the duration of the war. It was suggested by Admiral William E. Leahy that, “The Japanese were already defeated and ready to surrender”(Source 2).…

    • 1374 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Teetering to Surrender: A Critical Analysis of “The Shock of the Atomic Bomb and Japan’s Decision to Surrender— A Reconsideration” Individuals see “The Shock of the Atomic Bomb and Japan’s Decision to Surrender— A Reconsideration,” by Sadao Asada, as tedious and boring. Including names of different articles and historians can seem useless and insignificant, however I challenge you to see the strengths within this piece. Asada’s academic article puts entertainment and emotional appeal aside to discuss a different side of the Hiroshima bombing then previously emphasized, due to new information. As a result, Asada’s factual article presents a convincing case: the atomic bombs and Russian pressure were both necessary for Japan to finally surrender,…

    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Within a month of the bombing, people began to lose their hair, experience diarrhea, and contract leukemia. However, many people remained unaware of the full effects of the radioactivity because of the Press Code information ban so many people continued their lives as normally as they could (Mapping the Modern Mind: Readings for World Cultures III 139). Among them was Watanabe’s own brother who contracted infiltration of the lungs and then leukemia a couple of years after the explosion but kept working for many years afterward without treatment. It wasn’t until 1961, over sixteen years after the bombing that he was diagnosed, but he had already begun to waste away and he died in 1963 at the age of thirty-eight. In describing the agonizing death of her brother, Watanabe notes the far reaching horrors of the bombing, stating that not only was it “going through hell to experience the destructive force and the heat rays of the bomb, it was also hell to watch people dying” (Mapping the Modern Mind: Readings for World Cultures III…

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Was America justified in dropping the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki? On August 6th, 1945, the US dropped an atomic bomb on the city of Hiroshima. It was the first time a nuclear weapon had been used in combat, against civilians. Between 40,000 and 60,00 people died instantly, and many more would die in the aftermath, either due to their injuries or radiation poisoning.…

    • 1739 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Was the U.S justified in dropping atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki during the Second World War? Discuss the benefits and costs that it resulted.” 1. Introduction During World War Two, the U.S dropped two atomic bombs on the cities Hiroshima and Nagasaki, causing high death rates upon the Japanese. Many people may argue that the bombings were devastating and have had a dreadful effect on people’s lives.…

    • 1213 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    On the morning of August 6, 1945, the people of Hiroshima watched as two B-29 planes flew over the city. Many continued on with their day, not giving the planes a second glance. Other spectators continued watching in curiosity as the sight of the planes diminished into the sky away from the city and parachutes came down from them. Within seconds and without a trace of sound, the city of Hiroshima was completely destroyed.…

    • 1780 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    These words, originally of the Hindu scripture, accurately manifest the realities of harnessed nuclear power; humanity is her own worst enemy. Hundreds of thousands of civilians in Hiroshima and Nagasaki were instantly obliterated from the impact, others suffered severe burns and died from infection, and thousands more were killed by the radiation. Survivors exposed to radiation were subject to negative health effects both cancerous and noncancerous. According to studies, “Excess leukemia deaths became the first major radiation-associated long-term health effect … solid-cancer deaths followed soon afterward and noncancer disease deaths were suggested in the mid-1960s.” (“Long-term Radiation-Related Health Effects in a Unique Human Population: Lessons Learned from the Atomic Bomb Survivors of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.”…

    • 1124 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays