Atomic Bomb Pros And Cons Essay

Superior Essays
August 6th, 1945 will be a day never forgotten in history. The atomic bombs dropped in Hiroshima and Nagasaki will always be connected to Harry S. Truman’s presidency, and is ultimately one of the toughest decisions a president has had to make in United States’ past. Justifying the situation was even more challenging. Having to address the general public after the fact added onto the affair, and will never be an all around positive response to the decision made. There will always be questions beginning with “what if?” as people debate the pros and cons of the situation and try to determine what the alternate choice would have done to our country and war matters if he had decided otherwise. There is no possible way for someone to know, or to be content with the choice of ending lives of innocent civilians, but there was no way to avoid this. Harry S. Truman was faced with multiple moral dilemmas, among these were killing innocent civilians and introducing weapons of mass destruction.
The death toll due to the atomic bombs in Hiroshima estimated over 150,000 precious lives and in Nagasaki, 75,000. Half of these numbers were people killed on the day the bomb went off. This number is outrageous and is a tragedy in itself to even look at these gruesome statistics, but in only affecting two cities to cause Japan to finally surrender,
…show more content…
Consequently, the thread of these bombs have kept any possible large scale war at bay, saving countless millions of lives annually. Truman had to face an unfavorable dilemma in whether or not to drop the bombs or to continue to fight the unyielding country of Japan, and I believe he made the right decision. As previously stated, by no means is killing in any manner moral, but his choice made the most sense, even if it may not have at the time, and was honestly the most just in this given

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    WWII Was Justified

    • 1495 Words
    • 6 Pages

    “Was the US justified in dropping the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in WWII.” Discuss the benefits and costs that resulted. The horrendous outcomes of World War I (1914 – 1919) truly terrified the whole world. Yet, followed by the war that supposedly ended all wars, the second war began (1939 – 1945). Lasting six years, with more than 60 million casualties, 6 times as many compared to the casualties in WWI. The deaths and the natures of war raises discussions of how cruel and inhumane war is, but it was the atomic bomb used to end WWII that remained controversial over the years.…

    • 1495 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Not only did hundreds die immediately after the blast but another 60,000 died by the end of the year. The cost and harsh aftermath of bombs are the second reason why the bombs should not have been dropped. Even though the bombs were a great achievement for America, the result of the bombs was seen as a harsh punishment. A quote from the same article says, “but that experience, looking down and finding nothing left of Hiroshima. Hiroshima didn’t exist.” The result of the atomic killed on a massive scale destroyed the city along with its people.…

    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During the time period of decision making, President Truman of the United States, along with Winston Churchill of Great Britain and Josef Stalin of the Soviet Union, gathered at the Potsdam Conference in Germany to discuss whether or not the bombs should be dropped. For Truman alone, it was one of the most difficult decisions of his life, due to all the consequences that may arise in the aftermath (Understanding the Decision to Drop the Bomb, 2012). Churchill also realized how heavy this choice was, knowing full well that the extraordinary power could lead to many other nations becoming interested in such weapons. However, after the matter was brought up to Stalin, it is speculated he didn’t necessarily understand the significance of the information he had been told, and he simply nodded and made arrangements for his nuclear scientist to see the US experts the following day (Houghton-Mifflin, 1953, p. 69-70). Because tensions between the Soviet Union and the United States had already been arising, Truman began to fear that Stalin would not only take interest in the weapons, but he would most likely attempt to begin experiments as well.…

    • 1219 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Not only did America have the strongest army, navy, and air force, but also the atomic bomb, a secret weapon capable of such vast destruction that no one had a defense against it (Capio 65). Dropping the bombs ended the war quickly before the Russians could become involved. Truman and his advisors did not want Russia to enter the fighting, and have a chance to demonstrate their power. Diary entries by Secretary of State Henry Stinson detailed these thoughts at the time. Stinson referred to the bombs as the “master card” in dealing, not just with Japan, but with the Soviet Union as well (Messer 50).…

    • 1117 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Either way lives would be lost, which makes the choices even harder. Although I might not completely agree with President Truman's decision, I recognize that he did the best that he could. It also shows me that all of America carries the guilt of being the only country to use an atomic bomb. Furthermore, my grandfather was in World War II and without this bomb he would have needed to continue fighting. He has told me numerous stories about the war and it has really shown me how much Hiroshima has affected our family.…

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Despite this, Japan’s leaders mobilized a large part of the population into a national militia to defend the home islands. In fact, “even after the use of the atomic bombs, the Japanese military still fought on” (Wilson Miscamble, 2014). The atomic bombs helped Emperor Hirohito realise the futility of trying to defend the home islands. Furthermore, all other viable scenarios, such as an invasion, would have resulted in much higher casualties for both the allies and Japan. If such an invasion was to occur, it “would cost 250,000 American lives” (Jason Hook, 2002).…

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Japan was already planning a surrender when the first atomic bomb was dropped. It caused so much devastation to the people and the city, that Japan already knew they lost. The United States wasted a bomb that had a vast amount of power on a small city that did not even have that many buildings to destroy. Also the amount of health risks it made for the people was absurd and downright cruel. These innocent people died suffering because of the symptoms they had from the atomic bomb and radiation.…

    • 1475 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nuclear Weapons Dbq

    • 1328 Words
    • 6 Pages

    World War 2 is considered one of the bloodiest wars in our history. It was the first time the world witnessed the destructive power of newly developed nuclear weapons by the Americans. It was the use of nuclear bombs that officially ended the war, but yet a lot of people condemned the United States for using such frightening and destructive weapons due to multiple reasons such as the deaths of innocent Japanese civilians, the probability of the use of such weapons in future wars which can cause further deaths and other negative effects that the nuclear weapons may cause. Although the use of nuclear weapons may seem immoral and they are indeed very frightening and destructive, America was justified in dropping the atomic bomb on Japan in 1945.…

    • 1328 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The war in the Pacific, including Iwo Jima was extremely bloody and cost many lives. A lot of things led to the bomb in Hiroshima including Manhattan project which was the making of the bomb and the bombing of the first bomb in Alamogordo. Many people suggested the atomic bomb with hopes of ending the war sooner and to save lives. However, many people also advised against using the bomb because it would kill thousands upon thousands. They also advised against it because of The Hague Convention and the Historic National Laws of war.…

    • 1254 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    From a 21st century perspective there is a lot to consider when discussing the dropping of the atomic bomb on Japan. When choosing to bomb an entire nation to shambles to protect personal interests one has to look at all the accounts associated with it. While the united stated may try to rationalize the reasoning behind its actions, the bombing of Japan during World War II will never be justified. The moral obligations of the United States to the rest of the world are too high for the United States to use its powers for such evil. One of the proposed reasons for dropping the bomb was its effectiveness in ending the war.…

    • 1012 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays