Strategic Bombing In World War II

Improved Essays
The main ideas presented in Major Problems in the History of World War II: Chapter 4 revolve around the analysis of the use of strategic bombing and its effects on the war. Documents presented in this chapter focus on the importance of naval and air warfare as well as the most effective way to defeat Germany as presented by allied leaders. Historians Richard Overy and Michael S. Sherry provide their analyses of the importance of airpower in the war and how it affected all parties involved in the war. Overy discusses the importance of naval and air power and how strategic bombings were able to shape the outcome of the war, while Sherry talks more about the destruction caused by the bombings during the war was directly linked to fanaticism that …show more content…
Overy states that the bombings were vital to reducing German production and decreasing German morale in hopes of ending the war in a more timely manner. He states that "to understand what bombing has achieved it is necessary, though agonizingly difficult, to lay aside the moral issue. Its strategic merits or limitations are distinct from its ethical implications, however closely they have become entwined in the contemporary debate."147 This sentiment is reiterated in Document #3 Major Problems in the History of World War II: Chapter 4. A mother of a bomber pilot is concerned that her son 's sole job in the war will be to spread death and destruction. The letter is curtailed through a reply that justifies the necessary evils of the technology at the disposal of the Americans. American leaders believed that the ends justified the means and Sherry examines this sentiment by indicating that the use of strategic bombings was seen as a necessary evil to ensure survival and success. He equates this necessity for victory as "validating any means of means of destruction that vaguely promised to secure it, since political authority defined the path to victory as lying so substantially through production and technology."152 Sherry asserts that the Allied powers would do whatever it took to win the war even if it included bombings that were not strategically important and that was derived from technological fanaticism while Overy claims that everything done in the war effort was for the greater good of the world. These distinctions are evident with the Allied powers "overkill" approach to end the war with the bombings of the Dresden and the Japanese cities. They believed destruction would suit their

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The Second World War was a brutal conflict that was marked in history as one of the largest and most brutal conflicts recorded in human history. The Axis and Allied Powers waged a terrible war against each other that spanned six continents. To ensure the defeat of the Axis Powers, "The Big Three," referred to Great Britain, the United States and the Soviet Union sought to bring about an end to the Axis Powers and Nazi Germany. These three countries were critical in ensuring the defeat of Nazi Germany. There will be an analysis of the agenda of the Allied Powers during the war and what the goals of the Allied Powers were post World War II.…

    • 757 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Prompt & Utter Destruction is a book by J. Samuel Walker that details the events leading up the decision for the United States to drop the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki during World War II. Narrative-like descriptions of cabinet meetings, personal diary entries of important players, and first-hand accounts from soldiers in the war are all artfully pieced together to recreate the story of Truman’s decision, overturning many common misconceptions about the era and presenting new information. While Walker presents his own conclusions using the data he has compiled, he is careful to leave room for the reader to make his/her own inferences with the same data, and admits there are plenty of gaps in his information that could potentially…

    • 793 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The United States of America was and still is one of the biggest countries in the world when it comes to power and demand. Developing such a weapon as the Atomic bomb that can scare and destroy anyone and anything, was in United States favor. But was it really necessary to use a weapon this powerful and dangerous? Yes, I think so. This essay is about my and the two professors Robert James Maddox and Tsuyoshi Hasegawa point of view; if it was necessary to drop the Atomic bombs to end the war.…

    • 1270 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    War is fought between countries, but even in times of conflict between states, civilian affairs must continue. The Allied governmental leaders “who approved it were neither wicked nor cruel, though it may well be that they were too remote from the harsh realities of war” (Vonnegut 187). Unlike the military leaders, the governmental leaders were not present on the battlefield. Without witnessing the reality of war, the Allied leaders could not hope to grasp the true consequences of their actions. They dealt with numbers and spreadsheets rather than physical brutality. Germans, both citizens and soldiers, fell into two categories: potential threats and neutralized combatants. In each decision the Allies made, there was a distinction between Allies and Nazis, between the “good guys” and “bad guys.” These distinctions allowed removed leaders to become callous to the murder of those they considered evil. In this respect, the Allies became “a willfully deaf and blind enemy” (193). Carnage committed on enemy soil appeared as clever and practical strategy, while domestic sorrow at the loss of their own soldiers was ever present. An event “beyond belief, worse than the blackest nightmare” (Metzger 2) was bound to have a negative effect on those who approved it. With the ever present danger of public scrutiny, the American government chose to keep the Dresden bombing a secret. Buried in obscurity, the Dresden bombing was initially prevented from becoming a political detriment to those who approved it. The truth, however, was eventually know due to firsthand accounts and Slaughter House Five because “pro-government historians are allowed to bury mass murder stories only when the survivors maintain their silence” (Harkins 2). Once the Dresden bombing was public knowledge, many governmental authorities felt the need to justify themselves by citing “the necessary effort to completely defeat and utterly destroy…

    • 1650 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    A key example comes from General Giulio Douhet who intensively believed that the development of the aircraft would change the nature of war forever, “it [made it] possible to go far behind the fortified lines of defense without first breaking through them”. He made it very clear in his book The Command of the air that he strongly believed that having a powerful air force would ultimately win you the war, as airstrikes were indefensible. Herman Göring, the leader of the German Luftwaffe strongly used Douhet’s theories in his planning of the airstrikes which went along with the Nazi Blitzkrieg that decimated most of Western Europe. In this essay I will illustrate that the strategies that were formulated by Douhet and used by generals such as Göring were for the most part unsuccessful, as clearly seen in the Battle of Britain, I will show that although the nature of war was changed by the use of airplanes, war can not be won by the use of an air…

    • 1534 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During World War Two, the U.S dropped two atomic bombs on the cities Hiroshima and Nagasaki, causing high death rates upon the Japanese. Many people may argue that the bombings were devastating and have had a dreadful effect on people’s lives. However, world war two was not a disagreement to cause destruction towards the countries. The U.S was justified in dropping atomic bombs as it was an alternative to end the war at an instance and to also prevent the death rate of civilians. This was also necessary as it was America’s desire to shorten the war if the Japanese surrendered. In addition, the USA were acting against the Japanese in…

    • 1213 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Atomic Bomb DBQ Essay

    • 1374 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The use of the Atomic Bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki immediately ended World War II and stopped the continuation of catastrophic and widespread violence in Japan. The Japanese had an audacious outlook on their offense throughout the duration of the war. It was suggested by Admiral William E. Leahy that, “The Japanese were already defeated and ready to surrender”(Source 2). However, this statement is directly refuted by the fact that an official warning was issued by the United States to Japan. It was a clear and direct warning, there was scarce…

    • 1374 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The use of the atomic bomb is one of the most controversial topics discussed in United States history. One key figure involved in the decision-making process to use the bomb against Japan is Henry L. Stimson. Stimson served as the Secretary of War under President William Howard Taft, Franklin D. Roosevelt, and Harry S. Truman. Furthermore, he performed as the Secretary of State for President Herbert Hoover. In the book, Atomic Tragedy: Henry L. Stimson and the Decision to Use the Bomb against Japan, Sean L. Malloy provides an extremely credible study of Stimson’s relationship with the atomic bomb. He concludes that Stimson’s final decision to bomb Japan was one of his greatest mistakes, comprising his principled beliefs. Because of his various use of facts and narratives of Stimson, Malloy’s analysis is very creditable and well-founded. However, the application of the atomic bomb led to the end of the very long and drawn-out World War II. I disagree with Malloy’s analysis because the use of the atomic bomb was most definitely not Stimson’s biggest mistake, but perhaps his greatest achievement.…

    • 1112 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    World War II was a global war, a very significant point in history, which changed the world today. The war went from September 1st, 1939 to September 2nd, 1945 (HistoryNet, 2015). One major event during the war was the surprise bombing of the American Naval Base, located in Pearl Harbour, Hawaii. It was bombed on the 7th of December, 1941 and lasted for around 2 hours. Conducted by the Japanese during WWII, the attack on Pearl Harbour led to severe and influential outcomes which altered the outcome of the war, changing the world today. This essay will discuss the significance of Pearl Harbour, along with its militarily strategic positioning and the US Pacific Fleet, the main reasons why the Japanese chose to attack Pearl Harbour, and both the…

    • 1190 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of the most controversial decisions in American history was Harry S. Truman’s decision to use atomic bombs on Japan during World War II. On August 6, 1945, the United States dropped an atomic bomb on the Japanese city of Hiroshima and killed between 70,000 and 80,000 Japanese people. After three days, another bomb was dropped on Nagasaki and killed 70,000 people immediately. Radiation from the bombs led to extensive damage as well. The Japanese then chose to surrender on September 2 which marked the end of the great war. Many people wonder if the decision to drop atomic bombs on the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki was a military necessity. This decision was a military necessity for multiple reasons. Many lives needed to be spared, a land…

    • 876 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Atomic Bomb Dbq

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages

    He said, "Mr. Byrnes did not argue that it was necessary to use the bomb against the cities of Japan in order to win the war." They had all known, even the government, that Japan would be defeated soon and that the bombs were not necessary. All that they were concerned about was that Russia could enter the war and spread Russian influence throughout Europe. They had used the bombs to show Russia that the U.S was strong and that they could handle things on their own. Mr. Byrnes also went on to say, "Our possessing and demonstrating the bomb would make Russia more manageable in Europe." On the other hand, the United States’ decision to drop the atomic bomb on Hiroshima was a military measure to ensure that Japan would fully surrender. In Document H titled, Radio Address, Harry S Truman, President Truman stated, “We have used it in order to shorten the agony of war, in order to save the lives of thousands and thousands of young Americans.” He stated that the U.S had used the atomic bombs to end the war quickly and to save more American lives. However, as said by General HH Arnold, the Japanese were already on the verge of collapse.” This meant that even if the bombs weren’t used, then Japan still would have…

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The fact that the United States decided to drop an atomic bomb over Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Japan shocked many people, including U.S. citizens and the Japanese. The U.S. used a brutal force choosing the atomic bomb, as proven by the thousands of deaths caused. The U.S. knew the extent of damage it was causing by deploying the bomb, and some people still question the motives for such a ruthless choice of weaponry. The atomic bomb, however destructive and questionable, seemed to be the only sure way of ensuring “unconditional surrender.” The U.S. took matters into its own hands to ensure an end to war on its own terms. The atomic bomb was, in fact, “a clear step designated to force Japan’s unconditional surrender;” however, this statement fails…

    • 979 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    World War II was a time when humans waged war against each other in the hopes of winning dominion over one another. Whether it was evil, territory, people, or racial tendencies, the fabric of war covered the world in a bloody scarf of destruction. After the United States entered the war, it proposed a way to execute strategic pinpoint bombing on high value military targets. These raids become the source of reflection and controversy. Some concluded that the bombing of civilians was deplorable and intentional, while others seen it as an involuntary action with tactical means. American strategic bombing was a fact of WWII and it requires looking at the works of authors that were for and against it, in all its creation.…

    • 1869 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    used the bombs was his belief that the U.S. had to keep adding military pressure in order for the Japanese emperor and his military advisers to surrender. “I felt that to extract a genuine surrender from the Emperor and his military advisers, they must be administered a tremendous shock which would carry convincing proof of our power to destroy the Empire. Such an effective shock would save many times the number of lives, both American and Japanese, that it would cost” (Stimson 101). Stimson believed this was the best way to prove the power of the U.S., by obtaining the Emperors surrender. Stimson’s convincing publication did quite serve to quiet down the critics, but not the historian Gar Alperovitz. Alperovitz strongly holds his opinion that the deployment of the atomic bombs was unnecessary. He asserts the Japanese were on the verge of surrendering and the bombs were just an inhumane thing to do. Alperovitz quotes the memoir written by admiral officer, William Leahy whom was on active duty during WWII which states, ‘“the use of this barbarous weapon at Hiroshima and Nagasaki was of no material assistance in our war against Japan. The Japanese were already defeated and ready to surrender….in being the first to use it, we…adopted an ethical standard common to the barbarians of the Dark Ages”’(Alperovitz). Quotes like these from high standing U.S. military leaders are used in Alperovitz favor in order to gain credible perspectives that the atomic bombs deployed in Hiroshima and Nagasaki were not a matter of military…

    • 1313 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    History is the past, and it’s important to reflect on the past, to help ensure that as a society we don’t repeat mistakes. At the time of both World War I and World War II, each became the largest war in history up until that point. Each war shared tremendous amounts of death, and the involvement of many countries, so it’s crucial to analyze the causes and the factors of each war to truly see the nature of the circumstances revolving both wars. Both World War I and World War II share many different aspects, but at the same time, they each to their own hold unique characteristics. The goal is to contrast differences between the qualities each share, and circumstances surrounding each.…

    • 1610 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays