Malloy’s motives were successful in the fact that I, as a reader, gained a better understanding of the complicated relationship between Stimson and the atomic bomb. His study broadened my view on this moment in history and made me realize that many more events were involved with this crisis than most people are aware of. However, I personally think it fails in teaching a lesson from Stimson’s “mistakes” to keep people refrained from using atomic bombs. A prime example of this is the Cold War. Although neither side actually used nuclear weapons, a consistent threatening to use them by both sides were present throughout the entire war. So did the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki really teach anyone a lesson? I believe the Cold War and Cuban Missile Crisis is what set people on the right mindsight, not the “atomic
Malloy’s motives were successful in the fact that I, as a reader, gained a better understanding of the complicated relationship between Stimson and the atomic bomb. His study broadened my view on this moment in history and made me realize that many more events were involved with this crisis than most people are aware of. However, I personally think it fails in teaching a lesson from Stimson’s “mistakes” to keep people refrained from using atomic bombs. A prime example of this is the Cold War. Although neither side actually used nuclear weapons, a consistent threatening to use them by both sides were present throughout the entire war. So did the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki really teach anyone a lesson? I believe the Cold War and Cuban Missile Crisis is what set people on the right mindsight, not the “atomic