Logical Determinism And Free Will Essay

Improved Essays
Paper VIII Unlike the vast topics of philosophy, free will (ability to do otherwise and be the originator of the choice) is one that appeals to everyone regardless of their beliefs or life choices. The topic itself is an ontological issue, deeply rooted in the metaphysical nature of reality. For example, arguments for logical determinism are dependent on the aspect of the reality of time and whether or not the future already exists or if it is adaptable. Additionally, logical determinism can be approached by the religious route which implies that God’s omniscience makes it so that he knows the decision individuals will make. If that is so then individuals do not make their choices out of their free will, their choices already exist and they are unable to make the alternative choice. So the question really is …show more content…
To clarify, he does not simply want individuals to choose between the two but he really just wants for them to pick the good option. When individuals are making choices they often choose to comply and decide on the good option. They are even promised to save individuals a spot in heaven if they continuously commit good deeds. Thus, individuals are influenced to choose options they probably wouldn’t as a result of God. If choices are not being made on the “free” account of a person, without a higher force influencing them, then it goes to say that they do not have free will or they are not practicing their free own will.
A counterargument for this point would be that not all individuals believe in God, so if they don’t believe in him, they are not persuaded to make a certain choice over what they want. Thus, those who choose to believe in him, relinquish their free will to choose deeds other than good ones. Additionally, if one person or a few decide to not practice their free will, it cannot be concluded that free will, in general, does not

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    explanation and reasonings of the topic are completely contradictory. Throughout the essay, I will call into question what Ayer believes to be true, while at the same time, try to “take a walk in his shoes,” to see where he is coming from and to dig deeper into why Ayer believes his theories on the topic are correct. Ayer holds the belief that free will and determinism can both be true at the same time. He states his belief of free will as when, “it is implied that I could have acted otherwise,” and believed…

    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    J.J.C. Smart’s Explanation for an Accurate Account of Descriptive Intermediate Failure to Properly Distinguish Something between Determinism and Pure Chance. In the essay “Free Will, Praise and Blame” included in Free Will, J.J.C Smart presents the thesis that metaphysical freedom is self-contradictory. As part of this claim, Smart forwards the analogies of the aluminium and the china plates (Smart 67). Having the knowledge of physical properties, the likelihood of a plate made of aluminium breaking…

    • 336 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    author, philosopher, encyclopedist, and atheist who lived from 1723 to 1789 and a famous figure from the French enlightenment. In Holbach's most famous book called System of Nature, he lays out his views on the topic of free will and determinism in a section titled “The Illusion of Free Will”. In it Holbach writes, “[Man] is connected to universal nature, and submitted to the necessary and immutable laws that she imposes on all beings she contains…” (Holbach 438). Holbach essentially claims that all…

    • 1592 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays