Lacking the competency to read, the ability for accomplishment and advancement in academic and occupational spheres becomes finite (Lyon,2003). Major strides of attainment within the language arts and literacy, are negligible, as evidenced by data from the National …show more content…
As an authoritative figure, the input of the principal is essential to the collaborative efforts of all personnel, as they assess and comprehend student literacy. Booth and Roswell contend, “the more evidence there is of teamwork in a school, the more significant the change in literacy standards” (2007 p.15).
PRINCIPAL LEADERSHIP OR PRINCIPAL AS INSTRUCTIONAL LEADER
Literacy achievement has amassed heightened awareness since the turn of the new millennium. An area of responsibility of NCLB legislation and the National Reading Panel Report (2000) is to make literacy a core element of student education. There is a distinct correlation between student achievement and literacy (Fullan, 2007; Reutzel, 2004).
“Of all subject areas, literacy stands as one of the most effective vehicles for school change, that success in literacy ensures success in other curriculum areas” (Booth, 2007). There is substantial research data that offers, a principal 's grasp, insight and literary initiative is instrumental towards providing “high-quality literacy programs” (Reeves,2008). According to the Children’s Literacy Initiative (CLI), “Good principals know how to work together with teachers to develop a sense of shared purpose and recognize the potential of each student” (2003 p. 1). “The higher the principal level of management support for scheduling, financing, and evaluating of …show more content…
With professional development occurring within the confines of the brick and mortar of a school, it provides a more intimate approach, thus permitting coaches to become acquainted with the strengths and deficiencies of the school, as well as the surrounding community (Blachowicz, Buhle, Ogle, Frost, Corres, & Kinner, 2010). It further allows coaches and educators to expand upon classroom situations and apply specific approaches. Coaches and educators can fortify their relationship with the inclusion of the coach within the confines of the classroom (Puschak, 2006). Further more, when the profession development program is engaged in the school itself, both the coach and educator are able view the strategy, as it is intended to be, thus permitting them to develop pedagogical and content