Limits Of Congress Essay

Improved Essays
Ratings of Congress in the Rassmussen Report are taking a dip. We don’t trust Congress. According to my studies, it is because people cannot relate to its multimillionaire members, they appear to benefit from inside information in the stock market, and they are able to give themselves raises and other benefits by simply enacting the necessary legislation. What hardworking, struggling American can appreciate that? However, I believe for most Americans, including myself, Congress is the least trusted branch due to the fact that they rarely agree with each other on important issues that will affect our daily lives. We question how opposing sides know what is best for this country, much less an individual, with each vowing that it is correct. Polarization creates mistrust which leaves room for little faith in our government.
In considering what the all the latest polls say, the government is extremely disconnected from ordinary people. Many people feel that our values are not cherished and our representatives seem so far removed from our lives. Again, I cannot state this enough-get involved and stay
…show more content…
If the president is supposed to get something done in eight years, then Congress cannot use “not enough time” as an excuse. When politicians are more interested in doing what it takes to get re-elected than they are in doing what they think is right, the system has to change. Term limits would fix that. If we are so concerned with corrupt officials, why keep them in office for unlimited terms. Limiting congressional terms will open up the door for aspiring men and women with fresh ideas and views. The book states, “In many races, potential candidates may decide not to run because they fear that the incumbent simply has too much money or is too well liked or too well known.” By not supporting term limits, how many bright, young potential candidates slip through without ever being

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The 28th Amendment: Term Limits Why should congress have term limits? Simple. To get new ideas and people in and older, more generationally out-of-touch, out. Now sure, it’s always good to have some old wisdom to guide the younger, newer congressmen, it’s also good to have new people with new ideas for the ever-changing times we live in.…

    • 655 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Congressional Term Limit

    • 280 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Publius makes the argument in the federalist papers that congressional term limits are not too long, and are the proper length. He makes this argument specifically in Federalist 53. He rebukes the argument that annual elections lead to tyranny by demonstrating that states that hold elections every two years, such as South Carolina during that period, seem to have a sufficient amount of liberty. Publius argues that a term length in the House of Representatives of two years is sufficiently long before re election. Holding biennial congressional elections, publius argues, is not a problem,.…

    • 280 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rudalevige examines the ways in which the executive branch of government has evolved since it was first constructed under the founding fathers. He has found that the executive branch has become much larger and dramatically evolved since it was first created in the eighteenth century (Rudalevige, X, 2). Undoubtedly some changes were believed to be for the good of the country. At times these changes and expansions have proved to be fatal for the American citizens who were promised to be represented in the Legislative branch of government through the constitution. The creation of president’s dealing in “secrecy”, “deceit”, and “careless exercise of power” certainly developed through time (Rudalevige, 5).…

    • 1174 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    (Beinhart, 2002) With more voters involved, Congressmen would be elected by the amount of service they offer to the citizens of America. Term limits would allow people to more accurately choose the Congressmen that would represent them the best by judging them based on their policies, not their past terms. The competitiveness of elections caused by term limits would get voters more involved in politics and help them to choose the best…

    • 1115 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The debate on whether congressional representatives should or should not have term limits is still a big issue in the realm of the United States’ political system. This issue has been debated for many years, but is constantly overlooked by congressional representatives from across the country. Having congressional term limits would be extremely beneficial to the political system of the United States, and to the citizens of the United States. Some of the founding fathers were also in favor of creating term limits for representatives. The purpose of this paper is to prove that it would be beneficial for members of Congress to have term limits because it promotes new ideas, prevents corruption, and would have a positive impact on the legislation…

    • 1720 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, the Founding Fathers theorized that when certain people are given power, it will eventually led them to being corrupted by it all. By putting term limits on Congress, their power will be limited and candidates will be more likely to run for the purpose of serving the people. According to the article Debate: The Federalist and the contemporary debate on term limits, “In the executive branch, the political appointees who administer the departments perform jobs as difficult as those of congressmen, and they do so competently, without the benefit of twelve years of experience”(Kristol 1993). Implementing term limits means a reduction of time in office for representatives to pursue unlawful activities in order to gain and serve their own personal interests. As of today, “Congress members stay in office for years due to health and retirement benefits, pay raises, and because of the addiction of power” (Oppenheimer 1995, 725-729).…

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Polarization In Congress

    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In recent years, Congress has become increasingly polarized in terms of partisanship. The definition of partisan polarization is the separation of the two major parties as they move towards more severe issue positions. In other words, the members of Congress – both in the House of Representatives and in the Senate – tend to be either extremely liberal (corresponding to the Democratic party), or extremely conservative (corresponding to the Republican party). There are currently few members of the U.S. Congress that consider themselves to be moderates. Political scientists and journalists alike have speculated on why this phenomenon is occurring now, and some theories claim that this polarization is a return to the “natural” state of government,…

    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Should There be a Limit on Terms a President Can Serve? One of the few amendments that our government has determined to be necessary is the 22nd amendment. The 22nd amendment limits the number of terms that a president may serve. This amendment is based on the precedent that George Washington set when he served as our first president, he only served two terms.…

    • 1085 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Intelligence agencies have been caught spying on allies, American people and Politian’s, and torture techniques used on terrorist personnel to extract information. With all of the different findings of wrong doings that have came to light, President Barack Obama came out and admitted it will take time to regain the trust of the American people along with European Governments. When situations like this arise, it puts a black eye on all intelligence fields. The American people in general do not know how the intelligence field works. If Congress can put forth a strong effort to reform the perception of the national security agencies and open up a little more information to the public, then it could lead to the American people beginning to trust…

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Essay On Word Limits

    • 1606 Words
    • 6 Pages

    This is acknowledgeable experience gained that term limits would only destroy the value of in the long run (Loudon). Those already in office have promises they want to fulfill while they’re in office, but sometimes, those promises take time. Term limits would allow non-experienced legislators to take over the promises of these previous legislators because they simply didn’t have enough time to go through with it…

    • 1606 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many Americans still search for the epitome of a politician. Numerous voters look for the genie who will justly allocate all of their wishes, the Grandstander who will fight for them on Capitol Hill or the serene leader who will accomplish deeds based on principle. President Andrew Jackson had his own conception of politicians—individuals who had fallen to the corruption of politics. Similar to many Americans, Jackson wept for his country when he noticed corruption spreading among politicians. Historians, journalist, and congressman have assumably asked themselves:…

    • 969 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    If life tenure is such a good idea, as it would eliminate the above mentioned problems, then why are so many in opposition of term limits and shuns the proposals? They value judicial independence, and they all have forms of accountability and term limits, so what are the reasons for their views and objections about cutting life tenure? Making term limits would not make the stakes any less important or productive.…

    • 1421 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Members Of Congress Essay

    • 370 Words
    • 2 Pages

    This makes members of Congress more, not less powerful, because they can vote on proposed laws without worrying that their votes will cause the government to collapse. Because Congress is constitutionally independent of the president and because its members are not tightly disciplined by party leaders, members are free to express their views, to vote as they wish, and to become involved in the details of creating laws, and supervising agencies. Because members of the parliament have little independent power, they receive poor pay, few perquisites, little or no office space, and virtually no staff. But even the most junior member of the US House of Representatives has power and is rewarded accordingly. Congress is not a single organization, it is a vast and complex collection of organizations by which the business of Congress is carried on and through which members of Congress from alliances.…

    • 370 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Each house, however, clashes with one another, making for a broken Congress. In Hamilton and Madison’s On Congress (1788), in order to be in the House of Representatives, one “must be of the age of twenty-five years; must have been seven years a citizen of the United States; must, at the time of his election, be an inhabitant of the State he is to represent” (page 180). If these guidelines are met and one is elected as a representative, two year terms are served; however, there are no limitations to how many terms one may serve. Because of the young age and less time spent per…

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Understanding the relationship between the president and congress is key in understanding American politics. Congress and the president cannot avoid engaging with one another, with a constitutional set up that demands they work together constructively. Congress has its roles to play in policy making as does the president. The president and congress are given certain powers in the constitution, that power is divvied up, so that neither one of these branches has too much power at one time (Fisher 2007). The founders of the constitution were very distrustful of the presidency and feared if the president was given too much power it would lead to demagogy (Dickinson 2008).…

    • 1004 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays