• Home Page
  • Difference Between Aristotle's Definition Of Choice

Difference Between Aristotle's Definition Of Choice

Improved Essays
Show More
I believe there are many differences between Aristotle’s definition of choice and Wikipedia’s definition of choice.
According to Aristotle, “Choice will be deliberate desiring of things in our own power; for when we have reached judgement as a result of deliberation we desire in accordance with our deliberation.” The Wikipedia definition of choice involves mentally making a decision: judging the merits of multiple options and selecting one or more of them. The contrast between the two definitions is Aristotle’s includes deliberating/thinking, desiring, and then using the will to make a decision. The Wikipedia definition talks about mentally making a decision and then deliberating on that choice to make a final decision. The definition description is out of order …show more content…
Delegated decisions are inconsequential, and an example is choosing a bike shed color. Aristotle would argue that inconsequential things do not lead to ends. “The end, then, being what we wish for, the means what we deliberate about and choose, actions concerning means must be according to choice and voluntary.” Aristotle would say delegated decisions are not choices because they do not involve deliberation of the means, reason, or consequence. If a person does not use these aspects, then delegated decisions cannot lead to the end goal of humans. Therefore, they are not choices. I agree more with Aristotle because I would ask the question, “Why do I make delegated decisions?” Would it be just because, or for a purpose? People make choices to reach goals or for specific purposes. I feel delegated decisions are more like voluntary actions because one is aware of the situation and they do it themselves, but there is no true thought to it and not for a purpose. We need choice to reach our end happiness, and delegated decisions do not entail a person to reach what makes them true

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    The Role Of The Good In Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics
    • 1319 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Role Of The Good In Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics

    Aristotle decided to take on the subject of the good in his Nicomachean Ethics. Aristotle argues that every person must make a choice to act good. Within his ideas of the good it is imperative that men take responsibility for their own actions and that they understand what their own intentions are doing in relation to the good. However, there are some oppositions that believe this is not the case. They would argue that men have no control over how something appears to them or how they perceive it, and that for every man the final end/good/happiness looks differently.…

    • 1319 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Aristotle's Purpose Of Racing
    • 406 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Essay On Aristotle's Purpose Of Racing

    Aristotle believes in telos or purpose. This purpose would not be to best fulfill a personal goal, but it would be to fulfill the telos of the object, idea, or event. The best flute should not go to the best flute player for satisfaction, but rather to fulfill the purpose of the flute. The purpose of a flute is to be played; thus the best flute player would best fulfill that purpose. Aristotle also believes in the purpose more than the consequences.…

    • 406 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Decent Essays

    Reply To Aristotle's Rationale
    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Reply To Aristotle's Rationale

    Reply to Objection 1: Parmenides, your notion of being is too strong. When it comes to the definition of being you provided, the idea that being cannot change is incorrect. Being can change while remaining the same, so the notion of something coming to be or passing away with change, would be incorrect, as I have stated in my response and given examples. Through potential and matter, nothing is coming to be or passing away, because it is still the same substance throughout. The form of the substance always had the potential to become the change, so nothing is coming to be and the substance is not passing away, but rather staying the same.…

    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More
  • Decent Essays

    Aristotle Sea Battle Analysis
    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Aristotle Sea Battle Analysis

    Katherine Sierka Dodd PHL 150 20 September 2015 Aristotle’s “De Interpretatione” Aristotle's Sea Battle Problem, discusses whether every assertion about the future must be either true or false. The contradiction to Aristotle’s concept is an assertion in which states what the other denies. Aristotle’s The Sea Battle specifically stresses, “With regard to what is and what has been it is necessary for the affirmation or the negation to be true or false,” (e.g. Aristotle, p. 1) Aristotle’s two assertions were that, there will be a sea-battle tomorrow or that there will not be a sea-battle tomorrow. If there will be a sea battle tomorrow, and that is true, then it will still be true right now, and if it is true right now, it will be true no matter what.…

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Evil And Omnipotence Analysis
    • 1132 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Evil And Omnipotence Analysis

    For the definition of free will to reign true, human beings must make actions at their own discretion even if it is the wrong choice, which I have previously mentioned is an arbitrary measure. Once humans are created to always choose the good thing, the element of freedom is…

    • 1132 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Pelagian Controversy: An Analysis
    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Pelagian Controversy: An Analysis

    There does not seem to be any record of a major controversy concerning man’s freedom in the decision-making process prior to the Pelagian controversy of the 5th century. To be sure, there were debates concerning “free will” prior to the Pelagian controversy (Chrysostom, Origen, Jerome, and others opposed determinism), but none that took center stage the way the Pelagian controversy did. Pelagius, a British-born monk who resided in Rome before it fell in 410, was “roused to anger by an inert Christendom, that excused itself by pleading the frailty of the flesh and the impossibility of fulfilling the grievous commandments of God. [Pelagius] preached that God commanded nothing impossible, that man possessed the power of doing the good if only…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Moral Decisions In Sophocles Antigone
    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Moral Decisions In Sophocles Antigone

    What can we define a decision as? A decision can be defined as a determination arrived at after consideration between a conflict that a person(s) are having (“Decision”). This means that, after you are faced with a decision, picking between at least two things or ideas, you have to decide on what you think is right, and that turns into your decision. Many people have decisions they make on a daily basis, for example, brushing their teeth, combing their hair, and eating dinner; they also could have extended, long-term decisions, like having a child or saying yes to a proposal. In Antigone, by Sophocles, we see characters faced with major moral decisions.…

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Mixed Action In Book III Of Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics
    • 836 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Mixed Action In Book III Of Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics

    In Book III of Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics, he discusses the topic of involuntary, voluntary, and mixed actions. He states that “to distinguish the voluntary and the involuntary is presumable necessary for those who are studying the nature of virtue (140; Book III, Section 1).” He lays out how someone can distinguish between voluntary and involuntary actions, but mixed actions are a bit harder to distinguish. The topic of mixed actions raises the debate of whether mixed actions are really just voluntary actions, or if they are rather involuntary actions. I shall argue that mixed actions are really just voluntary actions.…

    • 836 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Amani Al Hi
    • 1412 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Amani Al Hi

    Why, though? Why do people let others make decisions for them? There are several reasons in which people do things that they don’t want to, though some say that people…

    • 1412 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    1975 Milgram Experiment
    • 1110 Words
    • 5 Pages

    1975 Milgram Experiment

    Here we shun our responsibility and we no longer consider our own behaviour. He believed that the participants were 'just following orders' and did not reflect or hold themselves responsible for what they were doing. It is the psychological state the obedient subject is in, when he or she is obeying authority. In this essay, evidence will be used to discuss whether individuals enter the agentic state when the individuals are submissive from different…

    • 1110 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Strawson's Argument
    • 721 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Strawson's Argument

    If one did not have the power to choose his or her action, how can he or she be held accountable for said action? Though most people believe in free will, that belief is often based of the feeling that they have a choice, and not actual facts or even solid arguments. Suppose you are walking…

    • 721 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Unbroken By Adrienne Rich: Character Analysis
    • 1759 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Unbroken By Adrienne Rich: Character Analysis

    Choice: The act of picking between two or more possibilities. This definition came right out of the dictionary and it makes choice sound very black and white. In reality, there are many factors that tie in with it. Every individual has a choice but their decision, whether good or bad are all based on their morals and their circumstances in life.…

    • 1759 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Erik Impact On Paul's Life Essay
    • 465 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Erik Impact On Paul's Life Essay

    A choice is a decision that is made by a person in a situation. Ever since my brother was born, I have had to make better choices so he doesn't make the same mistakes I have made. Erik has been the complete opposite of what i'm trying to be because Erik is a horrendous role model and has made bad choices that Paul had to deal with . Erik’s choices have impacted Paul's life ,self concept and relationships.…

    • 465 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Analysis Of Bernard Williams A Critique Of Utilitarianism
    • 1213 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Analysis Of Bernard Williams A Critique Of Utilitarianism

    In addition, the principle of autonomy is to obey our behavior to principles that express of the rational will and ought to be followed along with universal…

    • 1213 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    Aristotle's Definition Of Virtue In Nicomachean Ethics
    • 1885 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Aristotle's Definition Of Virtue In Nicomachean Ethics

    What does Aristotle define as virtue in N icomachean Ethics? It is stated in the text that “ Virtue, then is a state that decides, consisting in a mean, the mean relative to us, which is defined by reference to reason...,”1 (NE II.6 §15) to properly understand this quote and what Aristotle means by it, we must also understand that Aristotle distinguishes between two different forms of virtue. Said virtues are virtues of Character and virtues of Thought. Firstly, virtues of Character are “those that pertain to the part of the soul that cannot itself reason but is nonetheless capable of following reason”2 . Meaning said virtues are those which pertain to ethics and the character of the person. Think of it this way, virtue of character preserves…

    • 1885 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More

Related Topics

Ready To Get Started?
Discover
Company
Follow
©2024 Cram.com
Privacy Policy |  About Ads |  Site Map |  Advertise  | 
  • Cookie Settings