Julius Caesar Figurative Language

Improved Essays
The last rhetorical device that Antony used was figurative language. Figurative language is when the speaker plays around with his words which gives a different meaning than from the literal interpretation. The first figurative language that Antony uses is simile. The first example is, “Poor soul! His eyes are red as fire with weeping”. Here the citizens are able to compare Antony’s red eyes (he was crying before this) to the color of fire. This is able to sway the crowd because it shows how much Caesar meant for Antony. Not only for him, but for Rome because they all are “Friends, Romans, countrymen”. This quote is able to sway the crowd because it spreads the feeling that they should crying too. Antony is a Roman and so are they, so it affects them all. Lastly, this quote is able to sway the crowd because it makes them feel compassionate for Caesar. It makes them feel compassionate because they realize that Caesar meant a lot for Rome. Another example of figurative language is when Antony uses a metaphor in line 74. He states, “It will …show more content…
The speaker's message has a lot of relevance in today’s day. Politicians use all of these appeals and language in order to do what Antony did which is to pull people toward their sides. Politicians always show the good side of themselves and the bad side of the other politicians. This is what Antony did. He showed the good side of Caesar which showed that Brutus and Cassius were uncaring. Another example of the relevance is when manufacturers advertise their products. They always show the good side of their products by using all different kind of language. Then they compare their product and show how it beats their competition. We see this a lot with car commercials. Overall, the way that Antony swayed the crowd toward his side is still releveant in the 21st

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    In The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, Brutus is a stoic man and he's also Caesar's best friend. Brutus thinks Caesar is ambitious so he slews him for Rome. He approaches the Romans with mob mentality because he doesn't want them to think that he killed Caesar for the throne. He did this because he values reason above emotion although, when he says, "Not that I loved Caesar less, but that I loved Rome more," Brutus is showing us a comparison between his love of Caesar and his love of Rome by using these opposite words, less and more, What rhetorical appeals does the speaker use? He is using what is called "Antithesis" and "Epimone."…

    • 243 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The blank verse (iambic pentameter) in which Antony delivers his speech creates a soothing rhythm for the crowd which develops a deeper emotional bond between himself and the people, as well as, demonstrates a poetic and thoughtful resonance to the speech, which suggests that Antony has thought about how he will be delivering the message to the crowd. The careful use of rhetoric, in terms of ethos, pathos and logos, helps skillfully persuade the crowd against the conspirators as it convinces them of Antony’s credibility (which is already very high), presentation of a logical argument (“Did this in Caesar seem ambitious?”) and the evoking of feelings through the description of Caesar’s personality. The speech also incorporates repetition of…

    • 196 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Antony’s hyperbolic statement, “My heart is in the coffin there with Caesar,” () expresses his deep admiration for the fallen Julius Caesar and emphasizes his sense of loyalty, which allows the audience to empathize with him. Furthermore, Antony utilizes hyperbole and histrionic language as he uses Caesar’s will to taunt the funeral attendees: “they would go and kiss dead Caesar’s wounds / And dip their napkins in his sacred blood” (). This is an obvious exaggeration, but serves the important purpose of describing the benefits of the will, which astutely appeals to the selfishness of the citizens. Mark Antony uses hyperbole to not only demonstrate his own grief, but irrevocably stimulate hatred toward the…

    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Antony’s speech ultimately leads to a battle between him and the conspirators. Brutus has good intentions, but nevertheless he makes a lot of bad decisions which eventually leads to his…

    • 877 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Lastly, Antony uses pathos by saying “Bear with me. My heart is in the coffin there with Caesar, and I must pause till it come back to me.” And after saying so he starts to cry. This relates to the part in Steve Jobs speech where he tells the audience about his cancer. All of these literary techniques help him by making his speech strong and…

    • 682 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although people generally believe they are persuaded by ideas that they have discovered, William Shakespeare’s historic tragedy, Julius Caesar illustrates that an individual’s thoughts are inevitably shaped by external factors. Persuasion and suggestion are rhetorical skills that play central roles in Julius Caesar, but they also demonstrates how individuals bend towards words they want to hear when faced with a difficult situation. The play cautions the dangers and powers of rhetoric as a tool for manipulation and reminds us how easily and completely an audience can be both won and lost in terms of persuasion. In the few early scenes we are able to see Cassius promoting his own views upon Brutus.…

    • 1114 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Other powerful words of Antony’s in Scene ii, such as grievous, rage, and mourn contribute to the use of pathos in Act III. Antony strategically uses pathos to light a flame under the people who are very capricious, in hopes that their deep emotions will cause them to act on their feelings. As Mark Antony exhibits his raw emotions, he is able to quickly get the commoners to follow his word. His use of Pathos gives him the ability to explain his feelings while allowing the people to feel like they have been expressed at the same…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In order to avenge Caesar, Mark Antony turns a shocked, confused crowd of mourners into an angry mob of rioters by using persuasive techniques. The main component of Antony’s speech, Pathos, appealed to the commoners by striking an emotional spot inside them, trying to turn the fickle crowd against Brutus. Antony displayed the persuasive technique of Pathos by repeating words, showing them Caesar’s body, and presenting Caesar’s will. In the beginning of Antony’s speech, he spoke of Brutus as an honorable man, but in this case he repeated the word, making the connotation of honorable negative.…

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    He reminded the people that Caesar would have ruined Rome, become a tyrant and would have enslaved everyone, he said "had you rather Caesar were living, and die all slaves, than that Caesar were dead?". He says this as a rhetorical question: it has quite an obvious answer but probably would have been false anyway. Brutus says that last quote like it is fact and that it will happen. The fact makes it seem more real.…

    • 1412 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Act III, Scene 2 of The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, Mark Antony turned a crowd of mourning citizens to an angry mob. Antony turned this crowd into an angry mob through multiple persuasive devices. Brutus and the other conspirators thought they were killing Caesar for the good of Rome, but Antony and other ideas. He wanted to discreetly show the crowd of Romans who the conspirators actually were to him, a group of murderers. In order to persuade the people to not have sympathy for the Conspirators, Antony showed them Caesar’s will, repetitively said the word “honorable”, and showed them Caesar’s body.…

    • 1153 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In William Shakespeare’s play “Julius Caesar” Mark Antony unleashes a powerful speech during Caesar’s funeral, aiming to persuade the people of Rome that Brutus was fallacious to kill Caesar and that they should avenge his death. In Antony’s oration, he argues his case against Brutus by using the rhetorical strategies of Ethos, Pathos and Logos to manipulate his audience to be on his side, rather than Brutus’s side. These three persuasion tools allow his audience to connect with him and he is able to effectively argue his case against than Brutus. Antony’s first priority is to establish ethos in his speech. Since Brutus is a friend of the powerful Caesar, Antony must transcend his credibility and prove to the Romans…

    • 1389 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In Shakespeare 's Julius Caesar, Marc Antony had the herculean task of turning the Roman population against Brutus and the other conspirators. To do this, Antony needed to follow up Brutus ' powerful oration with a short, supervised speech. Still, in little time Antony had turned the tides and had the Plebeians on his side. He had used certain devices in his speech, several of which include equalization, repetition, emotion, humility, irony, inflation, and anticipation, to aid in his success. Antony 's strategies worked like a charm, and even before his funeral oration had finished he and the conspirators all knew who had the upper hand.…

    • 1348 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Antony was able to convince the crowd to do what he wanted by conjuring their emotions. He was also able to gain power over the plebeians because they were followers. In addition, Antony’s speech was successful because he made the crowd feel pity as well as guilt for betraying Caesar. Furthermore, it made them feel anger towards the conspirators for killing Caesar and sympathy for Antony because he showed his emotions. Antony’s speech is one for many generations to uses as a model for persuasive speaking, as it uses genuine emotions to persuade the…

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Whether public speeches result from those such as Adolf Hitler or Martin Luther King, Jr., their remarkable ability to ignite the population persuades people to take up arms regardless of the cause. In the midst of Act III in The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, Brutus and Antony both speak to the bewildered citizenry regarding Caesar’s demise. Resulting from a handful of conspirators assassinating him in the Senate, Caesar’s death sparks chaos which demands explanation. Thus, some individuals assert Brutus’ speech over Antony’s by claiming that Brutus’ effect and ability to direct his point sooner propel him higher than Antony. Unfortunately, this argument fails to acknowledge Antony’s mightier impact on the audience and his employment of a larger…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While Brutus addresses the crowd with logic and reason, Antony uses emotion. The use of rhetorical questions, parallel structure, and repetition by Brutus and Antony throughout their speeches changes the views of the crowd and what they should believe. While…

    • 1002 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays