Emotions In Julius Caesar And Antony's Speech

Improved Essays
Emotions are what drive us, for one cannot be persuaded without understanding emotions. Learning new words might help us when feeling emotions because we can identify them. Words are the most powerful force available to humanity because we can choose what words to say depending on the situation. Antony’s speech at Caesar’s funeral was more effective than Brutus’ because Antony used genuine emotion to sway the crowd.
Brutus’ speech rationalized Caesar’s murder by using logic and reasoning because he did not want the plebeians to turn on him. Therefore, he believed that he could persuade the crowd by using reasoning. Brutus states, “As Caesar loved me, I weep for him;/ as he was fortunate I rejoice at it; as he was/ valiant, I honour him: but, as he was ambitious, I/ slew him”(3.2.24-27). This quote conveyed that Brutus loved Caesar, but he loved Rome more and that Caesar needed to be killed because he became too ambitious. Additionally, Brutus wanted the people to know that he loved Caesar by stating that he was very valiant and honorable. Brutus used pros, which is everyday language used by the common people because he wanted to show the crowd that he was one of them. Brutus started his speech by saying, “Romans, countrymen and lovers!...”(3.2.13) which showed that he was very loyal
…show more content…
Antony was able to convince the crowd to do what he wanted by conjuring their emotions. He was also able to gain power over the plebeians because they were followers. In addition, Antony’s speech was successful because he made the crowd feel pity as well as guilt for betraying Caesar. Furthermore, it made them feel anger towards the conspirators for killing Caesar and sympathy for Antony because he showed his emotions. Antony’s speech is one for many generations to uses as a model for persuasive speaking, as it uses genuine emotions to persuade the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Antony is a master of rhetoric, so it comes to no surprise that he was able to convince the crowd that they must kill Brutus and the rest of Caesar´s killers. To sway the crowd to his side Antony used several forms of rhetoric, and he was able to slip into their minds and convince them of what he wanted. Right off the bat Antony approached the crowd respectfully and fairly, demonstrating perfect ethos, and then he went on to try and jab at the people with emotional strategies, attempting to draw out sympathy and anger. Those two strategies may have worked just fine on their own, however, Antony uses three others; repetition, verbal irony, and one of the strongest: indirect suggestion to completely reach his goal.…

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Brutus is revealed through what he says by how he often says how much Rome is a value to him. For example, at Caesar’s funeral Brutus said “Not that I loved Caesar less, but that I loved Rome more.” (111). In this quote, Brutus refers to his reason for killing Caesar was for the better picture of…

    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    But, Antony’s speech was more effective because he connected to the Romans more by using strong logical and emotional appeals. He was able to touch the Romans’ hearts with his emotion and persuade their thoughts with his logic. The emotional appeals also added a sensitive feeling to the people for the loss of Caesar. Throughout Antony’s speech, he was able to demonstrate the true meaning of friendship towards Caesar by sticking by his side, even through his death. Through his strong use of mainly emotional appeals but also logic, Antony won over the Romans and turned them against…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Certain aspects of Brutus’ speech are ineffective in convincing the populace who, before this, were completely supportive of Caesar. He fails to give them a logical and just reason for his actions. Brutus uses logical fallacy in his oration, “Had you rather Caesar were living, and / die all slaves, than that Caesar were dead, to live all freemen?” He creates an either-or argument which reduces the issue to having only two outcomes. This case of false dilemma brings forth a non-existent problem since Caesar is not certain to become an oppressive ruler. While this rhetoric strategy is a clever choice to persuade an audience, Brutus uses it on the wrong people. As discussed before, the populace had already aligned themselves with Caesar and they might have thought that crowning him was in the best interest of Rome. Additionally, Brutus simply states that Caesar was ambitious (without evidence) and for this he was killed. On the surface, it appears that the commoners accept this as sufficient reasoning with lines such as, “Live, Brutus, live, live!” and “Caesar’s better parts / Shall be crowned in Brutus”. However, they have not been given any evidence to support this claim and these responses are based solely on Brutus’ questionable rhetoric strategy. This is ironic as it gives Brutus a false impression of their allegiance when their words are really serving…

    • 1172 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In order to avenge Caesar, Mark Antony turns a shocked, confused crowd of mourners into an angry mob of rioters by using persuasive techniques. The main component of Antony’s speech, Pathos, appealed to the commoners by striking an emotional spot inside them, trying to turn the fickle crowd against Brutus. Antony displayed the persuasive technique of Pathos by repeating words, showing them Caesar’s body, and presenting Caesar’s will.…

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Knowing he had to sway the crowd to believe his opinion, Antony had to discreetly show the crowd that conspirators were not heroes, but murderers. Using different forms of persuasion, Antony was able to achieve his goal of turing the sympathy to people now had for Brutus, over the Caesar once again. In order to persuade the people to not have sympathy for the Conspirators, Antony showed them Caesar’s will, repetitively said the word “honorable”, and showed them Caesar’s…

    • 1153 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Every time Antony cleverly pauses in his speech to let the plebeians comment, the plebeians are more spiteful toward the conspirators. As the crowd begins to favour Antony the citizens make comments like "Methinks there is much reason in his saying" which shows there change in opinion.…

    • 1412 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In Shakespeare 's Julius Caesar, Marc Antony had the herculean task of turning the Roman population against Brutus and the other conspirators. To do this, Antony needed to follow up Brutus ' powerful oration with a short, supervised speech. Still, in little time Antony had turned the tides and had the Plebeians on his side. He had used certain devices in his speech, several of which include equalization, repetition, emotion, humility, irony, inflation, and anticipation, to aid in his success. Antony 's strategies worked like a charm, and even before his funeral oration had finished he and the conspirators all knew who had the upper hand. These seven devices were the keys to Marc Antony 's success.…

    • 1348 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The modern person is being persuaded everyday through commercials, advertisements, and culture. In the play Julius Caesar by Shakespeare, Caesar is murdered by his best friends. After Caesar dies, Brutus and Antony give speeches; Brutus reasoning with the mob for why it was morally right to kill Caesar, and Antony opposing him. Antony was more effective in persuading the mob than Brutus because he used figurative language.…

    • 557 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Whether public speeches result from those such as Adolf Hitler or Martin Luther King, Jr., their remarkable ability to ignite the population persuades people to take up arms regardless of the cause. In the midst of Act III in The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, Brutus and Antony both speak to the bewildered citizenry regarding Caesar’s demise. Resulting from a handful of conspirators assassinating him in the Senate, Caesar’s death sparks chaos which demands explanation. Thus, some individuals assert Brutus’ speech over Antony’s by claiming that Brutus’ effect and ability to direct his point sooner propel him higher than Antony. Unfortunately, this argument fails to acknowledge Antony’s mightier impact on the audience and his employment of a larger…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Imagine losing a best friend and never saying goodbye.Imagine witnessing their last breath as they are brutally murdered. Imagine having to stand in front of a crowd trying to reason their death. In Shakespeare’s The Tragedy Julius Caesar, Mark Antony has to fill these dreadful shoes after witnessing the murder of his closest friend, Julius Caesar. In Act III, Antony stands in front of the group of Plebeians after they have just listened to Brutus, the conspirator’s, reasonings as to why Caesar deserved his death. Mark Antony uses compelling rhetoric, to switch their mindsets, so the commoners pledge to his words instead of Brutus’s. Some may believe Brutus’s leadership skills make him a great speaker, but Mark Antony’s powerful, raw words…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When Brutus recites a speech in the market place after Caesar’s death the speeches exemplify parallelism, verbal irony, and witty use of rhetoric. With the Roman public watching on eager to see a reprisal for the death of Caesar, Brutus uses the undetected technique of coercion on the Romans taking advantage of their easily susceptible minds. In his speech he proclaims his love for Caesar passionately stating “If there be any in this assembly, any dear friend of Caesar’s, to him I say that Brutus’ love to Caesar was no less than his”. With the public making up their minds, Brutus plays his pathos card, showing he really did care for Caesar but claims, “Have you rather Caesar were living and die all slaves, than that Caesar were dead, to live all free men?” .Here Brutus asks the Romans if they would rather be enslaved with Caesar living, or free with Caesar dead. In this case the citizens have their thoughts led astray by this rhetorical question which is focused on the positive outcome of Caesars death, away from the actual brutality and ruthlessness of the murder. Furthermore Brutus’ use of parallelism “As Caesar loved me, I weep for him /As he was fortunate, I rejoice at it/ As he was valiant, I honor him/ But as he was ambitious, I slew him” serves the purpose of directing the plebeians thoughts towards the fact that Caesars death was justified and that his reasoning behind the mutiny was that he loved Rome more than he loved Caesar. What this exemplifies is the power behind astute oration, where it is able to deceive individuals into believing they had themselves come to the conclusion whereas the idea was in fact…

    • 1114 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to John Morley, “Three things matter in a speech - who says it, how he says it, and what he says, and of the three, the latter matters the least.” John understancds that how the speaker presents himself and his ideas can change the side of the crowd, more than any word they could have said. When Brutus and Antony give their funeral speeches in Julius Caesar it is a critical moment for each. Both need to sway the crowd to agree with their perspective. While Brutus addresses the crowd with logic and reason, Antony uses emotion. The use of rhetorical questions, parallel structure, and repetition by Brutus and Antony throughout their speeches changes the views of the crowd and what they should believe.…

    • 1002 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The play “Julius Caesar” explained two men named Brutus and Antony who both presented speeches in front of their town with different meanings about the assassination of Caesar. Antony had to ask Brutus for permission to speak at Caesar’s funeral. His despairing emotion and speech drawed the crowds special attention. Antony speech does not show any praise of caesar but does show sympathy and memorable memories that caesar did for his town. This whole situation sums a complete catastrophe. If Caesar was still living he would not allow the citizens of his village have freedom and be enslaved. Antony’s speech was more effective because it gave a positive meaning to the citizens. He begin to express his emotions about Caesar and his thoughts…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mark Antony was a very persuasive and intelligent man. As Rome 's people were seeking for answers, Mark saw this as a perfect opportunity to gain leverage and trust with the people. Mark Antony knew his audience very well, and appealed to the emotions (pathos) of the former soldiers of Caesar. He advertised the very skeptical assassination to promote doubt and sorrow, and received to get a rise out of the crowd in reaction. His goal was to create a mob mentality, and he succeeded in this because of his speech. He turned the Romans against the conspirators, resulting in a rebellion. This led Mark to gain the general appeal, and therefore overall power and authority. To achieve this, he presented the audience stab wounds in Caesar’s body, and manipulated the emotions of the people to benefit only himself in the end. This is a very ironic goal, given the reasoning for the assassination of Caesar (tyranny). To conclude, Mark was a master of persuasive speaking, and applied his full effort into his speech. Because of this, he reaped the benefits available, and gained the trust of the majority of Rome 's…

    • 1074 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays