Essay Judicial Law And Judicial Review

783 Words Aug 19th, 2015 4 Pages
Although the creation of judicial review was a significant victory for the Supreme Court, it is also much more complicated than what meets the eye. Judicial review can also be more accurately described as “constitutional review” due to the controversial methods that judicial reviews is carried out (“Judicial Review | Law”) . Such views included what is referred to as “judicial restraint approach” and “activist approach.” In judicial restraint approach, judges are believed to be able to decide cases only on the basis of the language of the laws and the Constitution. However, when looking at the activist approach, judges are able to recognize the principles of the laws or the Constitution and use them in response to circumstances of moral or economic philosophy (Wilson 430). Despite these competing views, judicial review is still in active use and has been playing a significant role in the United States’ government for many years.
Ever since the creation of the Supreme Court, the Judicial branch and judicial review has greatly evolved and reflected the concerns and beliefs of the public during each time frame. The political, economic, and cultural views of three historical eras has been the driving force behind the development of the federal courts. From 1787 to 1865, judicial review and the Supreme Court was focused on building the nation, creating balance and supremacy in the federal government, and placed a majority of its attention of social issues such as slavery (Wilson…

Related Documents