Furthermore, there are two judicial philosophies, the Judicial Activism and Judicial Restraint (Judicial Activism vs Judicial Restraint, 2013). Judicial activism is for the court to have a lot of power, to be policy makers, and the guardians of people liberty and rights. This philosophy requires for the courts to take an active role in solving political, economic, and social issues. Examples of Judicial Activism include, states requirement to provide legal aid for the poor and prison modernization. In contrast, judicial Restraint is for the court to have a passive body, define the law, and not seek out any political change. Its philosophy is to allow the states and the branches of federal governments to solve economic, political, and social
