How Did Federalism Guard Against Tyranny

Good Essays
Many years ago our founding fathers made a government without tyranny, they were smart to do this because they didn't want to have all the power in the hands of one person or group. Delegates (55) gathered in Philadelphia at the Constitutional Convention to frame a government without too much power in the hands of one person or a group. The Constitution was signed September 17, 1787. How did these framers protect us from tyranny ? They wanted to create a government without tyranny and they did by creating federalism, separation of powers, checks and balances, and the small state big state compromise.

Federalism helps guard against tyranny by separating the state and federal courts. This makes it difficult for one government figure to seize control. James Madison
…show more content…
So, within three years, some states get more than one representative depending the state population. The senate protects small states from being dominated by big states, while representation by population in the house protected the large states from being controlled by a minority. The Constitution says ‘’ representatives .... shall be apportioned ..... according to population .. The number of representatives shall not exceed one for every thirty thousand , but each state should have at least one ..’’ The small state - large state compromise prevented tyranny by giving small states a voice.

When our founding fathers created a government without tyranny by creating federalism, separation of powers, having the branches check each other, and the small state - big state compromise they prevented tyranny from occurring. Now we have many people running our government so not one person is getting their way And the people of the united states have a voice .When our founding fathers made a government without tyranny they saved the United

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    They had created the Constitution, but the had one question. How did the constitution guard against tyranny? Tyranny by definition is a person or group from having or getting too much power. They made the constitution prevents this tyranny by having four major ideas. Those ideas are federalism, Separation of powers, checks and balances, and finally equal representation in congress.…

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    It gave them a chance to start a new form of government without a king. The only problem was Hamilton and Jefferson did not have the same idea of the type of government they wanted to accomplish for their new nation. Hamilton wanted to accomplish a strong central government. He wanted a government that would be able to control the people’s behavior. He understood that “sometimes good people do bad things and bad people do good things”, this gave Hamilton an advantage because Jefferson did not recognize this.…

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The federalists knew that the government they were implementing would have many checks and balances that would help secure the safety of the people, states, and ultimately the government. The anti federalists brutus papers number five and six did not see it this way and instead misapplied the federal government as a complete power as a whole instead of separate…

    • 856 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    James Madison took these concerns, and addressed them in Federalist 10. He argued that a large republic wouldn’t limit liberty or promote tyranny, and that the people would be fully represented. Madison’s first argument was that it was nearly impossible for the government to become a superpower. The Constitution had built in “fail-safes” for the government, and it was difficult to gain enough power to be despotic. One of those fail-safes was the principle of limited government.…

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In The Philadelphia Story: The Founding Fathers and the Myth of Constitutional Intent, Jack Rakove tries to show us that the Convention did what they believed was best even though not everyone might see it. All men at the Convention arrived with different ideas and expectations but had to be reasonable and put the nation first. James Madison wanted the Virginia Plan to be passed because it meant that representation was based on population. However, the small states did not agree and presented the New Jersey plan which consisted of equal representation. To appease both the large and the small states the Great Compromise was created.…

    • 1704 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Checks and Balances is a system used by the U.S government to limit the power of each branch so that every branch is equal in power and no branch has too much power. This Checks and Balances system is important to our government because if not, one branch would take over the others and there would be no control or equality with the power our government has and is given by the people. The colonists past experiences with British rule led to the fear of creating a strong central government. Because of this fear the Articles of Confederation seemed like an amazing constitution for the U.S. It established a weak national (federal) government and strong state governments.…

    • 1142 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    These branches of the government are known as the executive, legislative and judicial branches. A system of checks and balances was put into place so that no single branch would have too much authority. The issue of equal representation in Congress that was poorly addressed in the Articles of Confederation was properly addressed in the Constitution. Delegates from larger states wanted number of representatives in Congress to be based on population, but of course small states called for equal representation. The Connecticut Compromise took in the wants of both sides and proposed a bicameral legislature with the House of Representatives based on state population and the Senate has equal…

    • 951 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The goal was to end up as a democratic government where individuals seek to find their life goals. “Individual self-fulfillment, unimpeded by government, would become a central element of American freedom” (Foner 191). Framers tried to enforce more potential freedom in the Articles of Confederation. The new United States feared a strong central government because of the British. The Articles of Confederation failed because Congress and the national government did not contain enough power.…

    • 1076 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    They believed that the Constitution would prevent a monarchy and/or a tyranny. Column 2, box 5 of the “Positions of the Constitution” paper states that “The Powers of the national government are separated and balanced…The Constitution gives the Congress and the Supreme Court ways to check the use of power by the executive branch.” This shows that the citizens did not need to fear a monarchy because checks and balances would prevent it. All of the branches would be equal and have ways to keep each other in line. Another argument of the Federalists was that the central government had little power and this power can only be used to help the people. Column 2, box 3 of the “Positions of the Constitution” paper says “[the government's] powers are limited to tasks that face the entire nation, such as trade, currency, and defense.” These problems were not addressed in the Articles of Confederation and caused confusion.…

    • 1315 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    If the government ever became destructive, it is the right of the people to alter or abolish it, and to institute new government (6); there is no point to abolish our government since it has succeeded for over 200 years. Though our government may have its flaws, that are where we as the people shall alter the constitution. If the states agreed upon common ideas to amend the constitution, there should be two representatives from each state; one representing the Republican Party and the other representative from the Democratic Party. These representatives should be able to work together and should be elected by their state. By only having two representatives from each state it limits it 100 people at the convention, making it less chaotic.…

    • 1119 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays