FBI.
The FBI has valid reasoning because just like San bernardino case 14 people are dead because iphone security,maybe if the FBI had the chance of going to people's phone that innocent people would of not die. Till they identify the case. Then now they could justify the FBI or Apple Company. Apple agrees that a backdoor is a solution,“Some would argue that building a backdoor for just one Iphone is a simple clean cut solution”.
What if a backdoor can have a solution to a case? That can be a solution for that a backdoor can be a great idea,FBI acknowledges that if they build a backdoor they can save more lives,FBI agrees that the United States government has demanded that apple a good decision of out security of their customers.
But Apple …show more content…
But we need our privacy too,our bank information pictures,it's not that we our hiding something but we still need privacy.
They can formulate the case of San Bernardino & then justify.
The FBI is asking for Apple to unlock the encrypted iPhone because it was used by one of the terrorists responsible for the tragic attack in San Bernardino, California.
It’s not about privacy it’s about security. While Apple focuses on privacy the FBI is focused on security, “the government is asking Apple to hack our own users and undermine decades of security advancements that protect our own customers”.
As a result, the FBI still will not be able to access terrorist communications. Law enforcement will have the legal authority and technical means to gather evidence.
Apple concedes that the FBI only want justice, “We believe the FBI’s intentions are good” FBI intentions are good, they are trying to have more secure communities a better
The FBI has valid reasoning because just like San bernardino case 14 people are dead because iphone security,maybe if the FBI had the chance of going to people's phone that innocent people would of not die. Till they identify the case. Then now they could justify the FBI or Apple Company. Apple agrees that a backdoor is a solution,“Some would argue that building a backdoor for just one Iphone is a simple clean cut solution”.
What if a backdoor can have a solution to a case? That can be a solution for that a backdoor can be a great idea,FBI acknowledges that if they build a backdoor they can save more lives,FBI agrees that the United States government has demanded that apple a good decision of out security of their customers.
But Apple …show more content…
But we need our privacy too,our bank information pictures,it's not that we our hiding something but we still need privacy.
They can formulate the case of San Bernardino & then justify.
The FBI is asking for Apple to unlock the encrypted iPhone because it was used by one of the terrorists responsible for the tragic attack in San Bernardino, California.
It’s not about privacy it’s about security. While Apple focuses on privacy the FBI is focused on security, “the government is asking Apple to hack our own users and undermine decades of security advancements that protect our own customers”.
As a result, the FBI still will not be able to access terrorist communications. Law enforcement will have the legal authority and technical means to gather evidence.
Apple concedes that the FBI only want justice, “We believe the FBI’s intentions are good” FBI intentions are good, they are trying to have more secure communities a better