Fourth Amendment Right To Privacy

Superior Essays
On June 6th, 2013 The Guardian and the Washington Post revealed the fact that the NSA had access to customer information on Apple, Microsoft, and Google computer products. The information obtained by the NSA was allegedly used to prevent any terrorist actions. However, the NSA has “[built] up a store of information on millions of US citizens, regardless of whether or not they are ‘persons of interest’ to the agency” (Brown). Although terrorist plots are a legitimate threat to America, the U.S government has overstepped its boundaries by violating the citizen’s of America’s fourth amendment right to privacy.
The United States of America was founded on the belief that governments should never skip the step of gaining consent of the people before making major decisions. The large amount of data on the NSA database is harmful to citizens if it is in the wrong hands, and those “wrong hands” could be from someone in the U.S who will use the information on the NSA database for malicious purposes. While the U.S government claims that the purpose of wire-tapping is for national security, how do the citizens of America know that
…show more content…
The fourth amendment states that the right of the people to be “secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized” (U.S. Const., amend. IV). The NSA spying on U.S citizens is similar to an unreasonable search through a person’s private documents. Whether or not the U.S government feels they are justified for their actions, they are not. The attempts of the head members of NSA to paint Edward Snowden as a criminal, are hypocritical, and are a transparent ploy to shift the negativity away from

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Although the Fourth Amendment protects people’s privacy, stops citizens from being ambushed, and keeps them safe from unfair arrests there is still a down side to the Fourth Amendment. For instance it prolongs the gathering of information involving a crime. Sometimes it makes the case go on for years and the felon is never convicted even though they broke the law, but they never had time to get enough evidence to convict them so they get away. Some people might say that they believe all Americans should be considered suspects and that therefore the government has probable cause for surveillance. (Avalon pg.1 pr.16)…

    • 232 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Resolved: The United States federal government should substantially curtail its domestic surveillance. Plan: The government will curtail its surveillance by only viewing collected data by means of a warrant. Intro-After the NSA reported their first transparency avowal, the publisher Omicron Technology Limited stated, “The report said 19,212 "national security letters"—administrative subpoenas that allow the FBI to collect information without a warrant—were issued last year, containing 38,832 requests for information.” These unwarranted leaks are why this problem needs to be solved. That is why we stand resolved that “The United States federal government should substantially curtain its domestic surveillance.…

    • 1880 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Fourth Amendment is all about the right to people’s privacy. It is looked at as “the principal constitutional protection against government spying” says David Cole. (Digital Trial pg.1, pr.9)The fourth amendment says that citizens have the right to be safe in their own homes, and are protected from unreasonable searches and seizures. (Digital Trial pg.1, pr.9) The ultimate goal of the Fourth Amendment is to protect citizen’s rights to privacy and freedom from arbitrary governmental intrusions.…

    • 168 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Although culprits have been caught without a search warrant, the Fourth Amendment has been mistreated by not needing a search warrant to be searched, keeping social media history, and being detected through surveillance camera without approval. As President Obama described the society as “not fully protected”, and “not having hundred percent security” at the same time. The government has taken advantage of the Fourth Amendment, they also have taken benefit of civilian rights.…

    • 73 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The surveillance program is effective with preventing terrorist attacks, but this violates the Fourth Amendment right because they are collecting data from everywhere and everyone around the country. According to the News Team staff of cfr.org people are starting to revolt against these outraeous and unlawful actions. Judge Richard J. Leon said “ surely such a program infringes that degree of privacy, that our founding fathers enshrined in the Fourth Amendment” (www.cfr.org). After, the exposure of the NSA in the mid-2013 American citizens have started to protest against these unlawful actions and development movements to protect their right of…

    • 1280 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    4th Amendment Essay

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Fourth Amendment emphasizes that people have the right to not be subjected to unreasonable searches and that they are “secure in their persons, house, papers and effects”. Espionage violates this amendment when they search through people that are suspicious and subject them to torment and arrest. An example of unorthodox espionage is the fact that the NSA has been “engaged in an illegal mass surveillance sharing programme that has affected millions of people around the world” as exposed by Edward Snowden, a former NSA contractor (Bowcott). The NSA has been performing surveillance that is very unethical and unjust. This must not continue because it violates America’s law saying that no citizen should be subjected to random searches.…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The National Security Agency’s (NSA) collection of metadata has been questioned on constitutional grounds. Specifically, the NSA’s actions have been argued to conflict with the Fourth Amendment of the constitution, which states that all citizens are free from being subjected to any unreasonable searches or seizures initiated by the government. Proponents of the NSA’s collection of metadata believe that it is a crucial tool in preventing potential terrorist attacks, while opponents of the program believe that its questionable constitutional validity, along with its lack of clear success in preventing a single terrorist attack, leaves the National Security Agency’s metadata collection program in desperate need of reform or outright abolishment.…

    • 2226 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Edward Snowden Cons

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The fourth amendment of our Constitution states: “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, house, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause.” But in a case involving Edward Snowden, a now famous leaker of classified National Security Administration (NSA) surveillance operator, this amendment was challenged. The NSA Prism Program is used to gain private information from all Americans no matter whether it is from private facebook messengers, private emails, private texts, or even private phone calls. Mr. Snowden tells reports that he and the Prism Program team have private information tracing back up to seven years ago from American’s using Verizon network. Legal…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sometimes, unfortunate events happen unexpectedly. The bombings in Brussels and Paris as well as the mass shooting in Florida are recent tragedies that come to mind, which lead to the discussion: When is it acceptable to “violate” an individual's privacy? One of the most controversial incidents, the devastating shooting of December 2015 in San Bernardino, California, caused citizens to question their right to privacy versus security. Syed Farook, the person responsible for murdering 14 people, owned an iPhone; the FBI pressured Apple to unlock the shooter’s device. Due to the privacy agreement with their customers, Apple, specifically chief executive Tim Cook, challenged the FBI’s demands to ensure that all iPhone owners’ civil liberties remained protected.…

    • 1085 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There is a finite line between national security and the privacy of innocent Americans in their day to day lives. The right to have privacy was provided to people when it was installed in the 4th amendment to the constitution. Although the U.S. Government has been stretching out this basic right and invading the privacy right that every American has. The government should not be allowed to freely use surveillance programs to watch over innocent people 's every move. Stated in the 4th amendment there is the right for people “to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated.…

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Importance Of The NSA

    • 1376 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The center on law and security (2007) states, “Critics of the NSA program do not necessarily object to the type of surveillance, but rather to the way in which it has been authorized, and to the absence of any oversight”…

    • 1376 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The NSA is not stealing America’s privacy in exchange for safety; the NSA is simply just stealing America’s privacy. Although the USA is known as the land of the free, there is not any freedom in the scrutiny of a citizen’s private conversation. Our government has neglected the constitution, taking every citizens’ right to their own privacy. Snowden has uncovered some of the NSA’s unfortunate secrets. The NSA’s illicit actions can’t be justified by the Patriot Act, nor any other law.…

    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The American people are split over the idea of the NSA’s mass surveillance some say it prevented another attack like 9/11 from happening while others say it is unconstitutional and steals privacy from innocent Americans. Rewind a little bit the NSA started this surveillance shortly after 9/11/2001 when America was attacked by terrorists. At the time the program was kept secret to protect the NSA. They did this because they wanted to be able to try to prevent terror without backlash from the public for spying. The act that authorized this surveillance was called the Patriot Act which was created in October of 2001 and made it so the government was allowed to utilize more resources to avert future attacks domestic and foreign.…

    • 299 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Essay On Right To Privacy

    • 1469 Words
    • 6 Pages

    When it violates the right to privacy the government is also violating American freedoms. There are many Americans willing to surrender their rights while others are fighting to protect them. The purpose of this essay is to…

    • 1469 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    According to the American Civil Liberties Union, the largest civil liberties activist movement in America, this kind of spying is illegal (ACLU 1). ACLU insists that the government uses a program that was enacted for the greater good to spy on its citizens, under the umbrella of national security reasons…

    • 1692 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays