The Court System Analysis

In the royal government, officials are appointed except in the two colonies, by the crown. Unlike America, the royal governors are stooges for the British government. The British government may look at American Judges like Kings Men, given that the courts has to be appointed by the governors in consultation with the British government, back home in London. A lot of people in America were scared of the courts. There was a point when America had a dispute with great Brittan, where the Massachusetts legislator voted to close the courts in Boston because they didn’t want legal documents baring those stamps from the Stamp Act. As john Addams goes home, he meets a farmer who tells him that the courts are closed and that he hopes they never open …show more content…
To settle legal rights and legal obligation the society needs court. Since everyone was afraid of courts, but they were needed, the people trusted a different branch of government called the legislators, to make the court system. The legislators did this by writing a bill and then the government has to sign the bill in to law depending on the state. This process was the way that the courts were formed. Each state forms its court system not by its constitution, but by a statue. The statue set forth which courts are needed, middle level court, appellate court or Supreme Court. Sometime two set of these courts are needed. One Court would deal with disputes of money and damages; the other dealing with injunction which is a judicial order enforcing the law. There are two kinds of injunction, mandatory injunction and prohibitory an injunction which tell you not to do something. These are some reasons why courts was and still is very …show more content…
They were cautious with the way that the constitution is framed and adopted to not infringe rights. Courts cannot just do this alone, they needed people with cases to begin the court system. This is important because in some state courts and in some English courts, court would just go off on their own and do their own judging. The reason why judges couldn’t do whatever they wanted is because if there was no case and nobody was injured, then a judge couldn’t make a case out of nothing. Courts cannot hear advisory opinions; only cases or controversy is allowed to be heard in the court. This consists between real people or real institutions where the courts are able to act. This puts a big limit on the courts and what they can or cannot